The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sympathetic and afferent somata projecting in hindlimb nerves and the anatomical organization of the lumbar sympathetic nervous system of the rat
Abstract
The anatomy of the sympathetic pathways from the spinal cord to the lumbar sympathetic trunk and the inferior mesenteric ganglion was studied systematically in the rat. Details of the arrangements of white and gray rami communicantes, sympathetic trunk ganglia, the intermesenteric nerve, and the lumbar splanchnic nerves are summarized. A modified nomenclature for the segmental ganglia of the paravertebral sympathetic chain is proposed. Cell bodies of sensory and sympathetic axons projecting to the skin and skeletal muscle of the rat hindlimb were labeled retrogradely with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) in order to study numbers, segmental distribution, and location of the somata of these neurons quantitatively. HRP was applied to the nerves supplying skeletal muscle (gastrocnemius‐soleus, GS), hairy skin (sural, SU; saphenous, SA) and to a mixed nerve (tibial, TI). All sensory somata and 96.4% of the sympathetic cell bodies were located ipsilaterally. Sensory somata were commonly restricted to two adjacent dorsal root ganglia (usually L3‐4 for SA; L4‐5 for GS, TI; L5‐6 for SU). Although the sympathetic somata were more widely distributed rostrocaudally (four to six segments), their maximum was always located one or two segments more cranially than the sensory outflow, i.e., corresponding to the rami communicantes grisei. From the data, it is estimated that 420 sympathetic and 530 afferent neurons project into GS, 590 and 3,610 into SU, 920 and 3,750 into SA, and 1,070 and 5,760 into TI. These absolute neuron numbers are compared with electron microscopic fiber counts from the literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimation of nuclear population from microtome sections
Abercrombie, M. (1946) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.1090940210 · Cited by 4,363
Cited by
Peters, C. M., Jimenez-Andrade, J. M., Jonas, B. M., Sevcik, M. A., Koewler, N. J., Ghilardi, J. R., Wong, G. Y., & Mantyh, P. W. (2007) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2006.07.022 · Cited by 288
Devor, M., Janig, W., & Michaelis, M. (1994) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1994.71.1.38 · Cited by 266
Aoyagi, Y., Stein, R. B., Branner, A., Pearson, K. G., & Normann, R. A. (2003) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/s0165-0270(03)00143-2 · Cited by 68
Silveira, W. A., Gonçalves, D. A., Graça, F. A., Andrade-Lopes, A. L., Bergantin, L. B., Zanon, N. M., Godinho, R. O., Kettelhut, I. C., & Navegantes, L. C. C. (2014) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01055.2013 · Cited by 47
Ganglionic transmission in a vasomotor pathway studied in vivo
Bratton, B., Davies, P., Jänig, W., & McAllen, R. (2010) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2009.185025 · Cited by 38
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Baron, R., Jänig, W., & Kollmann, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-09-15
- Volume
- 275
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 460-468
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W1977670826
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sympathetic and afferent somata projecting in hindlimb nerves and the anatomical organization of the lumbar sympathetic nervous system of the rat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.902750310
- The paper
- Baron, R., Jänig, W., & Kollmann, W. (1988). Sympathetic and afferent somata projecting in hindlimb nerves and the anatomical organization of the lumbar sympathetic nervous system of the rat. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902750310
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.