Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 159

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cholinergic vs. noncholinergic efferents from the mesopontine tegmentum to the extrapyramidal motor system nuclei

Lee, Henry J., Rye, David B., Hallanger, Ann E., Levey, Allan I., Wainer, Bruce H.·1988·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPTn) is reciprocally connected with extrapyramidal motor system nuclei (EPMS) whereas other studies have implicated the PPTn in behavioral state control phenomena such as sleep‐wakefulness cycles. Many of these studies define the nonprimate PPTn as an area of mesopontine tegmentum which is labeled from injections of anterograde tracers into the basal ganglia. Recently, we have defined the rat PPTn as a large‐celled, cholinergic nucleus. The rat PPTn is cytologically distinct from a group of smaller, noncholinergic neurons that are medially adjacent to the PPTn. This noncholinergic group is further distinguished from the PPTn by its afferent input from the globus pallidus, entopeduncular nucleus, and substantia nigra. We refer to the latter area as the midbrain extrapyramidal area (MEA). Using combined choline acetyltransferase immunohistochemistry of the PPTn and WGA‐HRP retrograde tracing from the EPMS, we investigated the efferent connections of the MEA and PPTn to the EPMS in the rat. The noncholinergic MEA, rather than the PPTn, is the major source of tegmental innervation to the globus pallidus, caudate‐putamen, subthalamic nucleus, entopeduncular nucleus, substantia nigra, and motor cortex. In contrast, the cholinergic PPTn is the major source of tegmental innervation to the ventrolateral thalamic nucleus. This finding is in contradistinction to thalamic projections from the surrounding reticular formation, which are identified only after WGA‐HRP injections into “nonspecific” thalamic nuclei. This body of evidence suggests that the noncholinergic MEA represents an additional component of the EPMS and may correspond to the “mesencephalic locomotor region.” The cholinergic PPTn may play a role in more global thalamic functions such as the “reticular activating system” rather than a primary role in motor function.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.902750402

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 159

Metadata

Authors
Lee, H. J., Rye, D. B., Hallanger, A. E., Levey, A. I., & Wainer, B. H.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-09-22
Volume
275
Issue
4
Pages
469-492
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2077135736
Cited by
159
References
1
FWCI
8.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cholinergic vs. noncholinergic efferents from the mesopontine tegmentum to the extrapyramidal motor system nuclei. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.902750402
The paper
Lee, H. J., Rye, D. B., Hallanger, A. E., Levey, A. I., & Wainer, B. H. (1988). Cholinergic vs. noncholinergic efferents from the mesopontine tegmentum to the extrapyramidal motor system nuclei. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902750402

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.