The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cytogenesis in the monkey retina
Abstract
Time of cell origin in the retina of the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatto) was studied by plotting the number of heavily radiolabeled nuclei in autoradiograms prepared from 2‐ to 6‐month‐old animals, each of which was exposed to a pulse of 3 H‐thymidine (3 H‐TdR) on a single embryonic (E) or postnatal (P) day. Cell birth in the monkey retina begins just after E27, and approximately 96% of cells are generated by E120. The remaining cells are produced during the last (∼ 45) prenatal days and into the first several weeks after birth. Cell genesis begins near the fovea, and proceeds towards the periphery. Cell division largely ceases in the foveal and perifoveal regions by E56. Despite extensive overlap, a class‐specific sequence of cell birth was observed. Ganglion and horizontal cells, which are born first, have largely congruent periods of cell genesis with the peak between E38 and E43, and termination around E70. The first labeled cones were apparent by E33, and their highest density was achieved between E43 and E56, tapering to low values at E70, although some cones are generated in the far periphery as late as E110. Amacrine cells are next in the cell birth sequence and begin genesis at E43, reach a peak production between E56 and E85, and cease by E110. Bipolar cell birth begins at the same time as amacrines, but appears to be separate from them temporally since their production reaches a peak between E56 and E102, and persists beyond the day of birth. Müller cells and rod photoreceptors, which begin to be generated at E45, achieve a peak, and decrease in density at the same time as bipolar cells, but continue genesis at low density on the day of birth. Thus, bipolar, Müller, and rod cells have a similar time of origin. The maximal temporal separation of cell birth is between cones and amacrine cells so that cell generation exhibits two relatively distinct phases: the first phase gives rise to ganglion, horizontal, and cone cells, and the second phase to amacrine, bipolar, rod, and Müller cells. In addition, cells of the first phase are generated faster than the second phase cells, and there are differences in the topography of spread of labeled cells between the two phases. Each cell class displays a central‐to‐peripheral gradient in genesis, although the spatiotemporal characteristics of the gradients differ between the classes. Heavily labeled ganglion cells, horizontal cells, and cone photoreceptors (phase 1) are found near the retinal margin much sooner than amacrine, bipolar, Müller, and rod photoreceptor cells (phase 2). As a consequence, genesis of phase 1 cells generally occurs over a more extensive retinal area, extending to the retinal margin, while phase 2 cell genesis ceases centrally by the time cell birth begins near the margin. The site of initial cessation of cell division is more variable than it is for the beginning of cytogenesis, although for all cell classes it is roughly centered on the fovea.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Specification of Cerebral Cortical Areas
Rakic, P. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3291116 · Cited by 3,127
Self-citationMode of cell migration to the superficial layers of fetal monkey neocortex
Rakic, P. (1972) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.901450105 · Cited by 2,170
Self-citationAutoradiographic Study of Cell Migration during Histogenesis of Cerebral Cortex in the Mouse
ANGEVINE, J. B., & SIDMAN, R. L. (1961) · Nature · doi:10.1038/192766b0 · Cited by 1,530
Cited by
Linked Regularities in the Development and Evolution of Mammalian Brains
Finlay, B. L., & Darlington, R. B. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7777856 · Cited by 1,217
Visually guided gradation of prey capture movements in larval zebrafish
Patterson, B. W., Abraham, A. O., MacIver, M. A., & McLean, D. L. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.087742 · Cited by 122
Achberger, K., Haderspeck, J. C., Kleger, A., & Liebau, S. (2019) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2018.05.005 · Cited by 75
Neurogenesis in adult primates
Rakic, P. (2002) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(02)38067-1 · Cited by 77
Self-citationCell birth and death in the mouse retinal ganglion cell layer
Farah, M. H., & Easter, S. S. (2005) · The Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.20615 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- la Vail, M. M., Rapaport, D. H., & Rakic, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-07
- Volume
- 309
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 86-114
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2087493271
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cytogenesis in the monkey retina. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.903090107
- The paper
- la Vail, M. M., Rapaport, D. H., & Rakic, P. (1991). Cytogenesis in the monkey retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903090107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.