Cited by 85Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchVisual perception and processing mechanismsNeural dynamics and brain function

Map of the synapses formed with the dendrites of spiny stellate neurons of cat visual cortex

Anderson, John C., Douglas, Rodney J., Martin, Kevan A. C., Nelson, J. Charmaine·1994·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

The synaptic input of six spiny stellate neurons in sublamina 4A of cat area 17 was assessed by electron microscopy. The neurons were physiologically characterized and filled with horseradish peroxidase in vivo. After processing the neurons were reconstructed at the light microscopic level using computer-assisted methods and analyzed quantitatively. The extensive branching of the dendritic tree about 50 microns from the soma meant that the distal branches constituted five times the length of proximal dendrite. Proximal and distal portions of a single dendrite from each neuron were examined in series of ultrathin sections (1,456 sections) in the electron microscope. The majority (79%) of the 263 synapses examined were asymmetric; the remainder (21%) were symmetric. Symmetric synapses formed 35% of synapses sampled on proximal dendrites and were usually located on the shaft. They formed only 4% of synapses sampled on distal dendrites. Spines accounted for less than half of the total asymmetric synapses (45%); the remainder were on shafts. Symmetric synapses formed with four of 92 spines. Nine spines formed no synapses. Spiny stellate neurons in cat visual cortex appear to differ considerably from pyramidal neurons in having a significant asymmetric (excitatory) synaptic input to the dendritic shaft.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.903410104

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Not all neurons have spines (e.g., stellate neurons) and they can receive excitatory input directly on their shafts.

    “However, not all neurons have spines (e.g., stellate neurons) and they can receive excitatory input directly on their shafts (Anderson et al., 1994).”

    From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Anderson et al., 1994

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 52 · Cited by 85

Authors
Anderson, J. C., Douglas, R. J., Martin, K. A. C., & Nelson, J. C.
Affiliations
Medical Research Council (GB)
Corresponding author
Martin, Kevan A. C.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-03
Volume
341
Issue
1
Pages
25-38
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2001222907
Cited by
85
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
spiny stellate neurons, dendritic synapses, asymmetric synapses, symmetric synapses, dendritic spines, dendritic shafts, dendritic morphology, cat visual cortex, area 17, synaptic input, excitatory synaptic input
MeSH terms
Animals, Axons, Brain Mapping, Cats, Dendrites, Histocytochemistry, Horseradish Peroxidase, Microscopy, Electron, Synapses, Visual Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review