Map of the synapses formed with the dendrites of spiny stellate neurons of cat visual cortex
Abstract
The synaptic input of six spiny stellate neurons in sublamina 4A of cat area 17 was assessed by electron microscopy. The neurons were physiologically characterized and filled with horseradish peroxidase in vivo. After processing the neurons were reconstructed at the light microscopic level using computer-assisted methods and analyzed quantitatively. The extensive branching of the dendritic tree about 50 microns from the soma meant that the distal branches constituted five times the length of proximal dendrite. Proximal and distal portions of a single dendrite from each neuron were examined in series of ultrathin sections (1,456 sections) in the electron microscope. The majority (79%) of the 263 synapses examined were asymmetric; the remainder (21%) were symmetric. Symmetric synapses formed 35% of synapses sampled on proximal dendrites and were usually located on the shaft. They formed only 4% of synapses sampled on distal dendrites. Spines accounted for less than half of the total asymmetric synapses (45%); the remainder were on shafts. Symmetric synapses formed with four of 92 spines. Nine spines formed no synapses. Spiny stellate neurons in cat visual cortex appear to differ considerably from pyramidal neurons in having a significant asymmetric (excitatory) synaptic input to the dendritic shaft.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Not all neurons have spines (e.g., stellate neurons) and they can receive excitatory input directly on their shafts.
“However, not all neurons have spines (e.g., stellate neurons) and they can receive excitatory input directly on their shafts (Anderson et al., 1994).”
From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Anderson et al., 1994
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 52 · Cited by 85
- Authors
- Anderson, J. C., Douglas, R. J., Martin, K. A. C., & Nelson, J. C.
- Affiliations
- Medical Research Council (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Martin, Kevan A. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-03
- Volume
- 341
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-38
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2001222907
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- spiny stellate neurons, dendritic synapses, asymmetric synapses, symmetric synapses, dendritic spines, dendritic shafts, dendritic morphology, cat visual cortex, area 17, synaptic input, excitatory synaptic input
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Axons, Brain Mapping, Cats, Dendrites, Histocytochemistry, Horseradish Peroxidase, Microscopy, Electron, Synapses, Visual Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review