Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization
Open accessAbstract
Dendritic spines are micron-sized protrusions that harbor the majority of excitatory synapses in the central nervous system. The head of the spine is connected to the dendritic shaft by a 50-400 nm thin membrane tube, called the spine neck, which has been hypothesized to confine biochemical and electric signals within the spine compartment. Such compartmentalization could minimize interspinal crosstalk and thereby support spine-specific synapse plasticity. However, to what extent compartmentalization is governed by spine morphology, and in particular the diameter of the spine neck, has remained unresolved. Here, we review recent advances in tool development - both experimental and theoretical - that facilitate studying the role of the spine neck in compartmentalization. Special emphasis is given to recent advances in microscopy methods and quantitative modeling applications as we discuss compartmentalization of biochemical signals, membrane receptors and electrical signals in spines. Multidisciplinary approaches should help to answer how dendritic spine architecture affects the cellular and molecular processes required for synapse maintenance and modulation.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review argues that dendritic spine morphology—especially spine neck diameter—can compartmentalize biochemical, receptor, and electrical signals, but the extent to which shape alone governs compartmentalization remains unresolved. It surveys super-resolution microscopy and quantitative modeling as complementary tools to directly link spine architecture to diffusion and transport.
Key findings
- Dendritic spines have a head connected by a 50–400 nm thin membrane tube called the spine neck; typical dimensions are ~<1 μm head diameter and a ~100 nm wide, ~1 μm long neck, with thin, stubby, and mushroom shape categories.
- Super-resolution imaging shows conventional light microscopy overestimates stubby spines; STED reaches up to 50 nm resolution, measured neck diameters ~40% smaller than confocal, with neck diameters as low as 51 nm in organotypic cultures and 59 nm in acute slices; two-photon STED gives 60–150 nm lateral resolution at 50–100 μm depth, and SMLM localizes molecules with 1–10 nm accuracy.
- Compartmentalization varies by signal: CaMKII and Cdc42 activity are confined to stimulated spines, whereas Ras activity spreads to typically 10–20 neighboring spines over 10 μm and RhoA spreads 5 μm; CaMKII peaks within 6 s and lasts a few minutes, Cdc42 inactivates with a 6 s time constant, and Rho inactivates five times slower.
- Modeling indicates receptor escape time follows a power-law dependence on neck radius and length, with τ ∝ 1/d²; mushroom-shaped spines retain AMPA receptors better, and decreasing neck radius increases the force needed to transport recycling endosomes through the neck.
Methods
- Narrative review synthesizing experimental and theoretical literature; no new primary experiments are reported.
- Evidence discussed comes from cultured hippocampal neurons, organotypic and acute slices, in vivo mouse brain, EM, live fluorescence microscopy, STED/RESOLFT/SMLM, FRAP, FRET-FLIM, single-particle tracking, and quantitative modeling.
- Main analysis is qualitative synthesis and comparison of microscopy and modeling results on spine morphology, diffusion, receptor dynamics, and electrical compartmentalization.
Limitations
- The authors state that the exact mechanisms governing compartmentalization are poorly understood, the extent to which protein diffusion is governed by spine shape alone remains unclear, most experiments could not directly correlate dynamic readouts with exact spine shape, and spine neck resistance is unknown and experimentally inaccessible.
- Stated technical limitations include EM cannot image living tissue and preparation can introduce artifacts; live super-resolution requires compromises between temporal and spatial resolution; two-photon resolution is diffraction-limited to 400–500 nm; STED requires high light intensities that can induce artifacts and phototoxicity.
- Stated modeling limitations include freely diffusive environments being a crude approximation, crowding effects on highly curved structures remaining elusive, and vesicle transport models not explicitly modeling the actin meshwork or spine neck deformation; as a review, no systematic search protocol or primary data are reported (evident from the text).
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
73 of 182 cited sources checked · 38 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Rho signaling leads to local AMPA receptor integration in the dendrite.
“while Rho signaling leads to local AMPA receptor integration in the dendrite (Patterson et al., 2010)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Patterson et al., 2010 source
The Results passage on signaling inhibitors reports that blocking Ras or ERK reduced the increase in AMPA receptor exocytosis in nearby dendrites. The Discussion likewise identifies Ras-ERK—not Rho—as the pathway involved. The paper supports local dendritic AMPA receptor exocytosis, but attributes its signaling dependence to a different pathway. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Different preparation procedures in EM can easily introduce artifacts.
“In addition, different preparation procedures can easily introduce artifacts (Bourne and Harris, 2012)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Bourne and Harris, 2012 source
- Premisecitation
Neck diameters of spines located at 0-10 μm depth were originally measured to be on average ~40% reduced compared to confocal imaging.
“Neck diameters of spines located at 0–10 μm depth were originally measured to be on average ~40% reduced compared to confocal imaging (Nägerl et al., 2008),”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Nägerl et al., 2008 source
- Premisecitation
Scanning the lasers with very small steps over the sample improves the resolution of the final image up to 50 nm.
“Therefore, scanning the lasers with very small steps over the sample improves the resolution of the final image up to 50 nm (Klar et al., 2000; Hell, 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Klar et al., 2000 source
The passage discussing Fig. 2 (page not supplied) says 40–50 nm resolution could be obtained by deconvolution, not by scanning in very small steps. The paper reports achieved resolution around 90–110 nm and attributes the improvement to stimulated emission depletion. Its mention of a stage with 5-nm precision concerns measuring an excitation spot, not improving the final image to 50 nm. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Hell, 2007 source
- Premisecitation
Recent breakthroughs in fluorescence microscopy allow imaging at resolutions below the diffraction limit, allowing to directly explore how spine shape affects diffusion of cytoplasmic or membrane-embedded molecules.
“Recent breakthroughs in fluorescence microscopy allow imaging at resolutions below the diffraction limit, allowing to directly explore how spine shape affects diffusion of cytoplasmic or membrane-embedded molecules (Takasaki and Sabatini, 2014; Tønnesen et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Takasaki and Sabatini, 2014 source
The Introduction reports that STED-2P achieves ~50 nm resolution, and the Results describe combining spine imaging with fluorescence recovery measurements to examine diffusion of a cytoplasmic dye. The paper does not report examining diffusion of membrane-embedded molecules, so that part of the sentence is not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Tønnesen et al., 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Several studies have combined two-photon live imaging with post hoc serial sectioning EM to examine the microstructure of spine, for example to directly demonstrate synapse formation associated with the emergence of a new spine during live imaging.
“Therefore, several studies have combined two-photon live imaging with post hoc serial sectioning EM to examine the microstructure of spine, for example to directly demonstrate synapse formation associated with the emergence of a new spine during live imaging (Trachtenberg et al., 2002; Holtmaat et al., 2006; Bourne and Harris, 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Rho-Rock and Ras-ERK signaling pathways lower the threshold for LTP in neighboring spines.
“In addition, Rho-Rock and Ras-ERK signaling pathways lower the threshold for LTP in neighboring spines (Zhu et al., 2002; Harvey and Svoboda, 2007; Harvey et al., 2008; Lee et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Zhu et al., 2002 source
- cites Harvey and Svoboda, 2007 source
The Abstract reports that LTP at one spine lowered the threshold for potentiation at neighboring spines. The Discussion (page unavailable) proposes a spreading intracellular signaling factor but does not identify Rho–ROCK or Ras–ERK as the pathways responsible. Thus the neighboring-spine effect is supported, but the named mechanism is not. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Harvey et al., 2008 source
The crosstalk experiment (p. 3) reports that a MEK inhibitor blocking Ras-ERK signaling reduced sustained enlargement of a neighboring spine after a subthreshold stimulus. The authors conclude that spread of Ras-dependent signaling regulates the local LTP induction threshold (p. 4). These passages support the Ras-ERK part, but do not establish a role for Rho-Rock. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Controlled addition and removal of AMPA-type glutamate receptors from the postsynaptic density underlies changes in synaptic strength during learning and memory formation.
“Controlled addition and removal of AMPA-type glutamate receptors from the postsynaptic density is believed to underlie the changes in synaptic strength during learning and memory formation (Malinow and Malenka, 2002; Sheng and Kim, 2002; Bredt and Nicoll, 2003; Collingridge et al., 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
This combination of techniques allowed recording activity patterns for CaMKII, Ras, RhoA and Cdc42 in dendritic spines following local glutamate uncaging.
“This combination of techniques allowed recording activity patterns for CaMKII (Lee et al., 2009), Ras (Harvey et al., 2008), RhoA and Cdc42 (Murakoshi et al., 2011) in dendritic spines following local glutamate uncaging.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Additional modeling studies have shown that the effective CaMKII diffusion constant depends heavily on binding to synaptic scaffolds and the actin cytoskeleton in spine necks.
“and additional modeling studies have shown that the effective CaMKII diffusion constant depends heavily on binding to synaptic scaffolds and the actin cytoskeleton in spine necks (Byrne et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Byrne et al., 2011 source
The Results (§3.4–3.5; page not available) model CaMKII binding to targets in the postsynaptic density and show that F-actin spacing at the spine neck–head boundary can strongly restrict diffusion. The claim overstates the mechanism: the paper models F-actin as a physical barrier, not binding to actin in the neck, and reports effects on escape and retention rather than a binding-dependent effective diffusion constant. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Results based on single spine stimulations contrast earlier biochemical studies that reported persistent phosphorylation of CaMKII upon more global induction of LTP.
“It should be noted that these results based on single spine stimulations contrast earlier biochemical studies that reported persistent phosphorylation of CaMKII upon more global induction of LTP (Fukunaga et al., 1995; Barria et al., 1997; Lisman and Zhabotinsky, 2001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Fukunaga et al., 1995 source
- cites Barria et al., 1997 source
- cites Lisman and Zhabotinsky, 2001 source
The passage labeled Abstract reports persistent CaMKII activation after LTP induction and discusses how CaMKII could remain highly phosphorylated. But this source is a model paper, not itself a biochemical study reporting that result; the cited passages also do not establish the claim’s distinction between global induction and single-spine stimulation. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The diffusional coupling of CaMKII with the dendrite was significantly slower, in the range of several minutes.
“The diffusional coupling of CaMKII with the dendrite was significantly slower, in the range of several minutes (Lee et al., 2009),”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Lee et al., 2009 source
- Premisecitation
The recovery time scale τ roughly follows what would be expected if diffusion is governed largely by spine geometry: τ=V*L/(D*A).
“Both studies suggest that the recovery time scale τ roughly follows what would be expected if diffusion is governed largely by spine geometry: τ=V*LD*A”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Takasaki and Sabatini, 2014 source
- cites Tønnesen et al., 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Fluorescently-tagged plasma membrane probes in spines showed a faster recovery rate in stubby than in mushroom-shaped spines.
“Furthermore, fluorescently-tagged plasma membrane probes in spines of different morphologies showed a faster recovery rate in stubby than in mushroom-shaped spines (Richards et al., 2004; Ashby et al., 2006), indicating that mushroom-shaped spines form a membrane compartment in which diffusion is slowed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
Mushroom-shaped spines form a membrane compartment in which diffusion is slowed.
“indicating that mushroom-shaped spines form a membrane compartment in which diffusion is slowed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Reduction of spine neck length after synaptic potentiation mediates enhanced electric coupling of spine and dendrite, thereby increasing the influence of the potentiated spine on the dendritic and somatic membrane potential.
“It was shown that reduction of spine neck length after synaptic potentiation mediates enhanced electric coupling of spine and dendrite, thereby increasing the influence of the potentiated spine on the dendritic and somatic membrane potential (Araya et al., 2014; Tønnesen et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Araya et al., 2014 source
The STDP results report spine-neck shortening alongside increased evoked potentials, and the Discussion says shortened spines become functionally connected to the soma. But the Biophysical Simulations and Discussion do not establish that enhanced electrical coupling mediates the increase: changes in synaptic conductance could also explain it. The copy does not directly demonstrate the claimed increase in dendritic membrane potential. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Tønnesen et al., 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Electric compartmentalization is moderate, but not absent, in most spines.
“Most recently, STED microscopy on dendritic spines in organotypic and acute slices suggested that electric compartmentalization is moderate, but not absent, in most spines (Takasaki and Sabatini, 2014; Tønnesen et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Takasaki and Sabatini, 2014 source
The Introduction reports evidence of significant voltage drops across spine necks, supporting the suggestion that electrical compartmentalization is not absent. But the Discussion (‘Correlation of morphology and synaptic signals’; page unavailable) says this study found no significant correlation between spine dimensions and synaptic potentials, and it does not establish that compartmentalization is moderate in most spines. Its STED-2P analysis was limited to acute brain slices. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Tønnesen et al., 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Synaptic potentiation of AMPA receptors is achieved by restricting their diffusion out of the synaptic membrane.
“Combining SEP-GluA1 photobleaching experiments with glutamate uncaging in organotypic slices revealed that synaptic potentiation of AMPA receptors is achieved by restricting their diffusion out of the synaptic membrane (Makino and Malinow, 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Makino and Malinow, 2009 source
- Premisecitation
Glutamate receptors localize to submicron scale clusters within the synaptic membrane.
“In addition, recent studies have shown that glutamate receptors localize to submicron scale clusters within the synaptic membrane as shown by various techniques ranging from EM to PALM microscopy (Ehlers et al., 2007; MacGillavry et al., 2013; Nair et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Active properties of dendritic spines play an important role in interactions between multiple synaptic inputs in dendritic computation.
“These active properties of dendritic spines are thought to play an important role in the interactions between multiple synaptic inputs in dendritic computation (Araya et al., 2007; Harnett et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
The high density of proteins in the synapse may reduce diffusion rates of all membrane-bound proteins including glutamate receptors due to crowding.
“Additionally, the high density of proteins in the synapse may reduce diffusion rates of all membrane-bound proteins including glutamate receptors due to crowding (Santamaria et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Santamaria et al., 2010 source
The Introduction describes the PSD as a crowded environment, and the Results report that AMPAR diffusion can be severely hampered by molecular crowding. The paper does not establish reduced diffusion rates for all membrane-bound proteins; the Discussion notes that NCAM can show normal or anomalous diffusion depending on its variant. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Mushroom shaped spines retain AMPA receptors in the vicinity of the synapse for an increased period of time.
“Mushroom shaped spines were found to retain AMPA receptors in the vicinity of the synapse for an increased period of time (Ashby et al., 2006; Ehlers et al., 2007; Opazo and Choquet, 2011, see Figure 3A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Crowding significantly decreases the in-plane mobility of proteins.
“Crowding itself is known to significantly decrease the in-plane mobility of proteins (Santamaria et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Santamaria et al., 2010 source
- Premisecitation
Modeling studies show that typical mushroom-like morphology strongly alters lateral diffusion of AMPA receptors, with pronounced suppression of receptor exit rate out of spines with decreasing neck radius and increasing neck length.
“These observations have been rationalized by several modeling studies, which showed that the typical mushroom-like morphology of dendritic spines strongly alters the lateral diffusion of AMPA receptors, demonstrating a pronounced suppression of the receptor exit rate out of spines with decreasing neck radius as well as increasing neck length (Holcman and Schuss, 2011; Kusters et al., 2013; Kusters”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Recycling endosomes necessary for delivery and retrieval of receptors operate both close to the synapse, within the head of the spine and in the dendritic shaft.
“These endosomes, necessary for the delivery and the retrieval of receptors, have been found to operate both close to the synapse, within the head of the spine and in the dendritic shaft (Park et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Park et al., 2006 source
- cites Wang et al., 2008 source
The Results section, “MyoVb is Enriched in Dendritic Spines and Traffics with Spine Endosomes” (page unavailable), places recycling endosomes at spine bases, occasionally in spine heads, and in dendritic shafts. The Introduction says they support local AMPA-receptor cycling and that disrupting their trafficking blocks receptor insertion. The copy does not establish that these endosomes are necessary for receptor retrieval, so that part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.79)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Reducing the radius of a membrane tube reduced the mobility of both lipids and proteins with a factor of five compared to planar diffusion.
“Recent experimental studies on membrane tubes show that reducing the radius of a membrane tube, which sets the relevant length scale in the Saffman-Delbruck theory, indeed reduced the mobility of both lipids and proteins with a factor of five compared to planar diffusion (Daniels and Turner, 2007; Domanov et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Daniels and Turner, 2007 source
- cites Domanov et al., 2011 source
The Lipid Diffusion in Vesicles and Tubes section reports more than a 3-fold reduction in lipid diffusion on the thinnest tubes compared with planar membranes. The Transmembrane Protein Diffusion section reports up to a 5-fold reduction for proteins. Thus, the source supports reduced mobility for both, but not the claimed factor of five for both. Page numbers were not provided in the copy. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Two-dimensional diffusion of membrane markers and AMPA-type glutamate receptors is sensitive to the morphology of the dendritic spine.
“Several experiments have shown that two-dimensional diffusion of membrane markers and AMPA-type glutamate receptors is sensitive to the morphology of the dendritic spine (Ashby et al., 2006; Shim et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
The thin and slender neck typical for mushroom spines could reduce the mobility of glutamate receptors compared to that on the dendritic shaft.
“The thin and slender neck, typical for mushroom spines, is in that same range of radii as in these experiments by Domanov et al. (2011) and could therefore reduce the mobility of glutamate receptors, compared to that on the dendritic shaft.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Domanov et al., 2011 source
- Premisecitation
Dendritic membranes on which these receptors reside are highly crowded structures.
“The dendritic membranes on which these receptors reside are, similar to other biological membranes, highly crowded structures (Takamori et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Takamori et al., 2006 source
The Summary (p. 1) identifies synaptic vesicles as the paper’s model. Implications for Membrane Structure (p. 13) reports that their membranes have unexpectedly high protein density and describes the proteins as crowded. The paper does not establish that the dendritic membranes bearing the cited receptors are highly crowded. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Two-photon microscopy overcomes limitations of confocal microscopy through the use of a pulsed infrared light source that excites fluorophores by the combined energy of two photons arriving on the sample nearly simultaneously.
“Two-photon microscopy overcomes both of these limitations through the use of a pulsed infrared light source that excites fluorophores by the combined energy of two photons arriving on the sample nearly simultaneously (Denk et al., 1990; Svoboda et al., 1996).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Compartmentalization may facilitate spine-specific plasticity and thereby regulate the individual strength of synaptic connections.
“Such compartmentalization may facilitate spine-specific plasticity and thereby regulate the individual strength of synaptic connections (Yuste and Denk, 1995; Matsuzaki et al., 2004; Holtmaat and Svoboda, 2009; Araya et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
RESOLFT reduces the size of the confocal volume using a specifically engineered fluorescent protein that can transition to a non-fluorescent dark state.
“To circumvent this, a comparable technique reduces the size of the confocal volume using a specifically engineered fluorescent protein that can transition to a non-fluorescent dark state (RESOLFT: reversible saturable/switchable optical transitions; Grotjohann et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grotjohann et al., 2011 source
- Premisecitation
In a small population of spines, no exchange of soluble fluorescent proteins between shaft and spine heads could be measured during a period of several minutes.
“In a small population of spines, no exchange of soluble fluorescent proteins between shaft and spine heads could be measured during a period of several minutes (Bloodgood and Sabatini, 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bloodgood and Sabatini, 2005 source
- Premisecitation
Early studies found that spines can compartmentalize cytoplasm as fluorescence recovery rates in dendritic spines are significantly lower than in the shaft.
“Using two-photon fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) microscopy on hippocampal neurons filled with fluorescent dyes in cultured slices, early studies found that spines can indeed compartmentalize cytoplasm as fluorescence recovery rates in dendritic spines are significantly lower than in the shaft (Svoboda et al., 1996).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Svoboda et al., 1996 source
- Interpretationreasoning
It is likely that spines have additional functions beyond facilitating connectivity.
“It is therefore likely that spines have additional functions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
None of the techniques described here improve the axial resolution.
“None of the techniques described here improve the axial resolution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Careful analysis of spine morphologies using superresolution microscopy has demonstrated that conventional light microscopy methods overestimate the amount of stubby spines in acute and organotypical slice cultures.
“Indeed, careful analysis of spine morphologies using superresolution microscopy has demonstrated that conventional light microscopy methods overestimate the amount of stubby spines in acute and organotypical slice cultures (Tønnesen et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tønnesen et al., 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Different technologies have allowed fluorescence microscopy at a resolution below the diffraction limit.
“Over the last years, different technologies have allowed fluorescence microscopy at a resolution below the diffraction limit (Hell, 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hell, 2007 source
- Premisecitation
The STED principle can also be applied to two-photon microscopy.
“The STED principle can also be applied to two-photon microscopy (Moneron and Hell, 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Moneron and Hell, 2009 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Several studies have reported evidence for compartmentalization, but the extent to which this was governed by shape alone could often not be directly assessed because the limited resolution of live-cell light microscopy did not allow to directly correlate diffusion dynamics and spine shape.
“Several studies have indeed reported evidence for compartmentalization, but the extent to which this was governed by shape alone could often not be directly assessed because the limited resolution of live-cell light microscopy did not allow to directly correlate diffusion dynamics and spine shape.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
STED microscopy has also been established in vivo in mouse brain.
“Recently, STED microscopy has also been established in vivo in mouse brain (Berning et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Berning et al., 2012 source
- Interpretationreasoning
The specific combinations of activity life-time and diffusion kinetics can explain why CaMKII and Cdc42 activities are restricted to spine heads whereas Ras and Rho activities spread along the dendrite.
“Thus, the specific combinations of activity life-time and diffusion kinetics can explain why CaMKII and Cdc42 activities are restricted to spine heads whereas Ras and Rho activities spread along the dendrite.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
When calcium is bound to buffering proteins like calmodulin, the diffusion of the resulting complex is more sensitive to spatial constraints than single ions because of its larger size.
“Importantly, when calcium is bound to buffering proteins like calmodulin, the diffusion of the resulting complex is more sensitive to spatial constraints than single ions because of its larger size (Sabatini et al., 2002; Tønnesen et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Sabatini et al., 2002 source
- cites Tønnesen et al., 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Pioneering two-photon microscopy of calcium dynamics in slices of hippocampal neurons revealed that synaptic stimulation results in accumulation of calcium ions in single spines.
“Pioneering two-photon microscopy of calcium dynamics in slices of hippocampal neurons revealed that synaptic stimulation results in accumulation of calcium ions in single spines (Yuste and Denk, 1995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yuste and Denk, 1995 source
- Premisecitation
Calcium ions in dendritic spines have an important function in activating signaling cascades that underlie and regulate synaptic plasticity.
“Calcium ions in dendritic spines have an important function in activating signaling cascades that underlie and regulate synaptic plasticity (Kennedy et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kennedy et al., 2005 source
- Premisecitation
In potentiated spines, the structural rearrangement of spine morphology during LTP slows the diffusional coupling between spines and dendrites even further.
“In potentiated spines, the structural rearrangement of spine morphology during LTP slows the diffusional coupling between spines and dendrites even further (Tønnesen et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tønnesen et al., 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The highly controlled signaling network allows precise spatiotemporal activation and retention of calcium-induced signaling.
“Taken together, this highly controlled signaling network allows precise spatiotemporal activation and retention of calcium-induced signaling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The interplay between diffusion and activity of signaling proteins is highly coordinated in dendritic spines.
“From the examples of CaMKII, Ras and Rho it becomes clear that the interplay between diffusion and activity of the signaling proteins is highly coordinated in dendritic spines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Despite all being triggered by NMDA-dependent calcium influx, these molecules have quite different signaling ranges.
“Thus, despite all being triggered by NMDA-dependent calcium influx, these molecules have quite different signaling ranges.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Live-cell imaging techniques like FRAP and single molecule tracking changed the view that glutamate receptors are restricted to synapses.
“Whereas reports based on static EM suggested that glutamate receptors are restricted to synapses (Nusser, 2000), live-cell imaging techniques like FRAP and single molecule tracking changed this view radically (Richards et al., 2004; Triller and Choquet, 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Together, this explains why Ras activity can spread to neighboring synapses.
“Together, this explains why Ras activity can spread to neighboring synapses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Because inactivation of CaMKII has faster kinetics than CaMKII diffusion, activity of the kinase is restricted to stimulated spines.
“Thus, because inactivation of CaMKII has faster kinetics than CaMKII diffusion, activity of the kinase is restricted to stimulated spines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Diffusion speeds of plasma membrane markers are reduced in spine necks.
“In addition, a live SMLM study showed reduced diffusion speeds of plasma membrane markers in spine necks (Shim et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shim et al., 2012 source
- Premisecitation
Exchange of single receptor molecules between spines is reduced during stimulation.
“The same study observed reduced exchange of single receptor molecules between spines during stimulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ehlers et al., 2007 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Diffusional trapping of truncated receptors in the spine head requires an intrinsic property of the spine to accumulate transmembrane proteins.
“the observed diffusional trapping of truncated receptors in the spine head is interesting as it requires an intrinsic property of the spine to accumulate transmembrane proteins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Trapping of receptors may be facilitated by the curvature of plasma membrane in spines.
“In addition, trapping of receptors may be facilitated by the curvature of plasma membrane in spines (Kusters et al., 2013), as discussed in detail below.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kusters et al., 2013 source
- Premisecitation
For dense systems, a tubular geometry effectively limits the diffusion of particles along the long axis of the tube.
“A recent study on the diffusion of steric repulsive particles confined to a cylinder confirmed that, for dense systems, a tubular geometry effectively limits the diffusion of particles along the long axis of the tube (Kusters et al., 2014a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kusters et al., 2014a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
Hydrodynamic interactions of proteins with the plasma membrane and the surrounding liquid significantly reduce their mobility.
“Hydrodynamic interactions of proteins with the plasma membrane and the surrounding liquid significantly reduce their mobility.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The mean escape time of receptors through the neck of a typical mushroom-shaped spine follows a power-law dependence on neck radius r and neck length l.
“More specifically, the characteristic timescale for retention, the mean escape time of receptors through the neck of a typical mushroom-shaped spines follows a power-law dependence on neck radius r, τescape~(rneck)−λ”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kusters et al., 2013 source
- cites Kusters and Storm, 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The timescale for an AMPA receptor reaching the synapse may be up to an order of magnitude faster than the time it takes for a receptor to exit through the neck of the spine.
“The timescale for an AMPA receptor reaching the synapse may be up to an order of magnitude faster that the time it takes for a receptor to exit through the neck of the spine.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kusters et al., 2013 source
- Interpretationreasoning
The overall shape of a dendritic spine impacts the active transport of recycling endosomes.
“Besides the effect of shape on lateral mobility, the overall shape of a dendritic spine also impacts the active transport of recycling endosomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Existing evidence supports a role of spine morphology in the compartmentalization of receptor trafficking and multiple signaling events.
“In this review we have highlighted existing evidence for a role of spine morphology in the compartmentalization of different important processes, such as receptor trafficking and multiple signaling events.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Membrane-bound proteins like glutamate receptors are restricted in their passage through the spine neck.
“Membrane-bound proteins like glutamate receptors are restricted in their passage through the spine neck, as we discussed in the Section Compartmentalization of Membrane-bound Receptors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Translocation of endosomes through spine necks is highly sensitive to the size of the neck and the applied force.
“However, this translocation is highly sensitive to the size of the neck and the applied force.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kusters et al., 2014b source
- Premisecitation
The postsynaptic density regulates the number of glutamate receptors localized in the synapse and thereby prevents their diffusion out of the spine.
“The postsynaptic density is believed to regulate the number of glutamate receptors localized in the synapse and thereby preventing their diffusion out of the spine (Opazo and Choquet, 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Opazo and Choquet, 2011 source
- Interpretationcitation
Mushroom shaped spines with the smallest neck radii are significantly more effective at retaining receptors.
“Mushroom shaped spines with the smallest neck radii are thus significantly more effective at retaining receptors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Constriction of the spine neck alone has a major impact on crosstalk between spine and dendrite.
“Nonetheless, these important studies demonstrate that the constriction of the spine neck alone has a major impact on crosstalk between spine and dendrite.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Cell adhesion complexes are diffusion barriers for membrane proteins.
“Cell adhesion complexes have also been identified as diffusion barriers for membrane proteins (O’Brien et al., 1999; Saglietti et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites O’Brien et al., 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Saglietti et al., 2007 source
- Premisecitation
The force produced by a realistic number of molecular motors is capable of transporting an endosome through constrictions with similar dimensions as spine necks.
“A recent study that explicitly modeled the translocation of vesicles through narrow constrictions has shown that the force produced by a realistic number of molecular motors is capable of transporting an endosome through constrictions with similar dimensions as spine necks (Kusters et al., 2014b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kusters et al., 2014b source
- Premisecitation
For flat membranes, Saffman and Delbruck predicted a logarithmic dependence of the diffusion coefficient with the "size" of the membrane, relative to the size of the protein.
“For flat membranes, Saffman and Delbruck (1975) predicted a logarithmic dependence of the diffusion coefficient with the “size” of the membrane, relative to the size of the protein.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Saffman and Delbruck (1975) source
- Interpretationreasoning
To reach the spine head, endosomes have to cross the actin rich neck, which inevitably causes the endosomes to deform.
“Endosome-based delivery of receptors into the head of the dendritic spine does come at a cost: to reach the spine head, they have to cross the actin rich neck, which inevitably causes the endosomes to deform.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Decreasing the size of the neck could hamper the active transport of receptors.
“Although this study did not explicitly model the actin meshwork in the neck, nor the potential deformation of the spine neck itself, it suggests that decreasing the size of the neck, in contrast to its effect on passive diffusion, could hamper the active transport of receptors (Kusters et al., 2014b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kusters et al., 2014b source
- Interpretationreasoning
The concept of a freely diffusive environment for these receptors is a very crude approximation of reality.
“The concept of a freely diffusive environment for these receptors, as has been presumed in all the previously described studies, is a very crude approximation of reality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The particular shape of the mushroom-shaped spine in combination with receptor trapping at the synapse further enhances their retention.
“Moreover, the particular shape of the mushroom-shaped spine in combination with receptor trapping at the synapse further enhances their retention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Mushroom shaped spines with an exocytosis site adjacent to the synapse are privileged over others, because they can rapidly and specifically regulate the synaptic AMPA receptor level.
“Altogether, this modeling study concluded that mushroom shaped spines with an exocytosis site adjacent to the synapse are privileged over others, because they can rapidly and specifically regulate the synaptic AMPA receptor level (Kusters et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kusters et al., 2013 source
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 26
- May combine two claims. 49
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe first STED images of spines in organotypical slices expressing yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) in a sparse subset of neurons were published in 2008.
“The first STED images of spines in organotypical slices expressing yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) in a sparse subset of neurons were published in 2008 (Nägerl et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Nägerl et al., 2008 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTwo-photon STED has been successfully applied to dendritic spines in organotypical slices, resulting in 60-150 nm lateral resolution at 50-100 μm depths, but without improving the axial resolution.
“Nevertheless, it has been successfully applied to dendritic spines in organotypical slices, resulting in 60–150 nm lateral resolution at 50–100 μm depths, but without improving the axial resolution (Ding et al., 2009; Bethge et al., 2013; Takasaki et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Ding et al., 2009 source
The Results ('Live-cell imaging of neuron dendrites and spines') report improved imaging of dendritic spines 30–110 μm below the surface, and 'Improved analysis of spine morphology' says lateral, but not axial, resolution improved. However, the experiments used acute mouse brain slices, not organotypic slices. The reported measurements also do not establish the claimed 60–150 nm lateral-resolution range; the Results report a 280 nm FWHM for imaged beads and thin filopodia. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Bethge et al., 2013 source
- cites Takasaki et al., 2013 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationModeling studies have often emphasized the interesting effects that shape can have on the diffusion of proteins, calcium ions and other signaling molecules.
“Nevertheless, modeling studies have often emphasized the interesting effects that shape can have on the diffusion of proteins, calcium ions and other signaling molecules (Holcman and Schuss, 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Holcman and Schuss, 2011 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSMLM uses switchable fluorophores or special imaging conditions to ensure that only a small, random subset of fluorophores in the sample is emitting at any given time.
“Another set of powerful techniques to achieve resolutions beyond the diffraction barrier uses switchable fluorophores or special imaging conditions to ensure that only a small, random subset of fluorophores in the sample is emitting at any given time (Huang et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Huang et al., 2009 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCalcium ions play a crucial role in initiating downstream signaling during long-term potentiation (LTP) and depression (LTD) and influx of calcium is both necessary and sufficient for structural synaptic plasticity.
“Calcium ions play a crucial role in initiating downstream signaling during long-term potentiation (LTP) and depression (LTD) and influx of calcium is both necessary and sufficient for structural synaptic plasticity (Pettit et al., 1994; Lledo et al., 1995; Otmakhov et al., 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Pettit et al., 1994 source
- cites Lledo et al., 1995 source
- cites Otmakhov et al., 2004 source
The Introduction (page unavailable) says Ca²⁺ entry through NMDA channels initiates LTP and activates CaMKII, supporting the LTP signaling portion. The paper also reports spine enlargement after chemical LTP, but it does not establish that calcium influx is both necessary and sufficient for structural synaptic plasticity or address calcium signaling during LTD. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLive super-resolution microscopy requires some thoughtful compromises between temporal and spatial resolution.
“In all cases, live super-resolution microscopy requires some thoughtful compromises between temporal and spatial resolution (Frost et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Frost et al., 2012 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDuring spine enlargement, rapid actin polymerization provides the mechanical force required for pushing out the spine membrane.
“For example, during spine enlargement, rapid actin polymerization provides the mechanical force required for pushing out the spine membrane (Bosch and Hayashi, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Bosch and Hayashi, 2012 source
In “F-actin regulation as a mechanism underlying structural plasticity” (page not supplied), the paper reports rapid actin polymerization during LTP and proposes that polymerization generates the force enlarging the spine. The citing sentence presents that proposed mechanism as an established fact; the passage does not explicitly describe pushing out the membrane. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationChanges in spine size are thought to be generally correlated with changes in the strength of the excitatory synapse.
“Changes in spine size are thought to be generally correlated with changes in the strength of the excitatory synapse (Schikorski and Stevens, 1999; Arellano et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBoth Cdc42 and Rho showed a rapid activity peak 30 s after stimulation followed by decay over 5 min and a sustained lower activity for more than 30 min.
“Both Cdc42 and Rho showed a rapid activity peak 30 s after stimulation followed by decay over 5 min and a sustained lower activity for more than 30 min.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Murakoshi et al., 2011 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRho inactivated five times slower than Cdc42 and could therefore spread into the dendrite.
“In contrast, Rho inactivated five times slower and could therefore spread into the dendrite.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Murakoshi et al., 2011 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUpon single-spine glutamate uncaging, the activation of CaMKII peaked within 6 s and only lasted for a few minutes.
“Upon single-spine glutamate uncaging, the activation of CaMKII peaked within 6 s and only lasted for a few minutes (Lee et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Lee et al., 2009 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationClasses of voltage gated calcium channels exclusively localize to spines but not dendrites and cooperate with other calcium channels to shape local depolarization and synaptic plasticity.
“Such an effect is strengthened by the existence of classes of voltage gated calcium channels that exclusively localize to spines but not dendrites and cooperate with other calcium channels to shape local depolarization and synaptic plasticity (Bloodgood and Sabatini, 2007b; Bloodgood et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Bloodgood and Sabatini, 2007b source
- cites Bloodgood et al., 2009 source
The Introduction states that SNX-482-sensitive voltage-gated calcium channels are found in spine heads but not dendritic shafts. The Results and Discussion describe localized calcium influx involving voltage-sensitive sources and NMDARs, but the Discussion presents effects on plasticity-related signaling as a possibility, not a demonstrated outcome. The paper does not establish that these channels cooperate with other calcium channels to shape local depolarization and synaptic plasticity as claimed. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCdc42 activity remained spatially confined, because it had an intrinsic inactivation time constant of 6 s and therefore depends on continuous activation by CaMKII.
“Nevertheless, Cdc42 activity remained spatially confined, because it had an intrinsic inactivation time constant of 6 s and therefore depends on continuous activation by CaMKII (Murakoshi et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Murakoshi et al., 2011 source
The passage indexed under Abstract (page unavailable) says Cdc42 activity was confined to stimulated spines and infers an inactivation time constant of about 6 s. It concludes that Cdc42 must be continuously activated at those spines, but describes CaMKII signaling as transient; it does not say CaMKII continuously activates Cdc42. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCaMKII is a calcium-activated kinase involved in structural plasticity by remodeling of the postsynaptic density, rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton and maintenance of spine enlargement.
“CaMKII is a calcium-activated kinase involved in structural plasticity by remodeling of the postsynaptic density (Yoshimura et al., 2002), rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton (Okamoto et al., 2007) and maintenance of spine enlargement (Matsuzaki et al., 2004; Lee et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCaMKII-Cdc42-Pak signaling increases spine volume and synaptic strength.
“CaMKII-Cdc42-Pak signaling increases spine volume and synaptic strength (Murakoshi et al., 2011)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Murakoshi et al., 2011 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe activation of Ras measured by FRET-FLIM was dependent on CaMKII activation, peaked later, and recovered to baseline level only after 15 min.
“The activation of Ras measured by FRET-FLIM was dependent on CaMKII activation, peaked later, and recovered to baseline level only after 15 min.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Harvey et al., 2008 source
The paper describes measuring Ras activation by FRET and fluorescence lifetime imaging (p. 1). It reports that a CaMKII inhibitor reduced Ras activation, which peaked within one minute of stimulation and returned to baseline within 15 minutes (p. 2). It does not establish that Ras peaked later than CaMKII, and “only after 15 min” overstates the reported return time. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRas activity was shown to invade typically 10-20 neighboring spines in a range of 10 μm along the dendrite, whereas RhoA activity only spread 5 μm and rarely invaded neighboring spines.
“Ras activity was shown to invade typically 10–20 neighboring spines in a range of 10 μm along the dendrite, whereas RhoA activity only spread 5 μm and rarely invaded neighboring spines (Harvey et al., 2008; Murakoshi et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Harvey et al., 2008 source
The spatial-profile passage (p. 2) reports that Ras activity spread along the dendrite and invaded nearby spines, and the discussion (p. 4) describes a spread of about 10 μm. But the 10–20 synapses figure (p. 3) is an expectation for native Ras based on the authors’ analysis, not a directly observed typical count. The RhoA comparison is attributable to the other citation in the sentence, not to Harvey et al. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Murakoshi et al., 2011 source
The passages indexed under Abstract (page unavailable) report that HRas activity spreads into surrounding spines over about 10 μm, while RhoA activity spreads about 5 μm along the dendrite and invades adjacent spines only slightly. They do not support the specific claim that Ras activity typically invades 10–20 neighboring spines. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRas diffusion rate out of the spine was relatively fast, reaching the dendrite within seconds without leaving any immobile fraction in the spine.
“Its diffusion rate out of the spine was relatively fast, reaching the dendrite within seconds without leaving any immobile fraction in the spine (Harvey et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Harvey et al., 2008 source
The mobility measurements (p. 2) show that Ras fluorescence decayed from the spine over seconds, and the discussion (p. 4) describes spine-to-dendrite diffusional coupling on a timescale of seconds. But the paper concludes only that there is no *major* immobile fraction: more than 90%, not all, of the measured fluorescence had left the spine after 30 seconds. It does not establish that there is no immobile fraction at all. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe diffusion kinetics of both Cdc42 and Rho were comparable and similar to Ras diffusion and showed no immobile fraction left in the spine.
“Also the diffusion kinetics of both molecules were comparable and similar to Ras diffusion and showed no immobile fraction left in the spine.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Murakoshi et al., 2011 source
The diffusion-coupling passage reports that RhoA and Cdc42 were similarly mobile, with decay times comparable to a constitutively active HRas mutant. But it says 10–20% of fluorescence remained after 20 seconds, suggesting no *major* immobile fraction—not that no immobile fraction was left in the spine. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDownstream of CaMKII, Ras and Rho GTPases are important for regulating spine morphology and synaptic strength.
“Downstream of CaMKII, Ras and Rho GTPases are important for regulating spine morphology (Ramakers, 2002; Saneyoshi et al., 2010) and synaptic strength (Zhu et al., 2002; Patterson et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Ramakers, 2002 source
- cites Saneyoshi et al., 2010 source
In “Regulation of spine and synapse formation by small GTPases” (page not provided), the review links CaMKII to Rac-regulating proteins involved in spine maturation and formation, and identifies Rho-family GTPases as regulators of spine morphology. It discusses Ras in relation to AMPA-receptor trafficking, but does not establish Ras as downstream of CaMKII in regulating spine morphology. The citing sentence attaches Saneyoshi et al. to spine morphology, not synaptic strength. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Zhu et al., 2002 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLong and thin necks prevent the diffusion of calcium, whereas shorter and thicker necks allow for better diffusional coupling with the dendrite.
“Nevertheless, morphology does play a role, as long and thin necks prevent the diffusion of calcium, whereas shorter and thicker necks allow for better diffusional coupling with the dendrite (Majewska et al., 2000; Holthoff et al., 2002; Sabatini et al., 2002; Korkotian et al., 2004; Noguchi et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Majewska et al., 2000 source
In “Functional regulation of calcium pumps and spine neck length” (page unavailable), the paper says diffusion between spine and dendrite depends on neck length, supporting the contrast between longer and shorter necks. It does not establish that long, thin necks prevent calcium diffusion or directly show that thicker necks improve coupling. The “Buffered calcium diffusion across the spine neck” section describes diffusion between the compartments, so “prevent” overstates the finding. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Holthoff et al., 2002 source
- cites Sabatini et al., 2002 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA pool of synaptic receptors is immobile while another synaptic pool and extrasynaptic receptors are rapidly moving.
“A pool of synaptic receptors was shown to be immobile while another synaptic pool and extrasynaptic receptors were rapidly moving.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Tardin et al., 2003 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationVoltage signals from the dendrite propagate without attenuation into spines, but synaptic potentials generated inside the spine head are filtered when they travel to the dendrite.
“This means that voltage signals from the dendrite propagate without attenuation into the spines (Holthoff et al., 2010; Carter et al., 2012; Popovic et al., 2014), but synaptic potentials generated inside the spine head are filtered when they travel to the dendrite (Araya et al., 2006, 2014; Harnett et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Holthoff et al., 2010 source
- cites Carter et al., 2012 source
Carter et al. is cited for the first clause, about dendrite-to-spine voltage propagation; the second clause has separate citations. The Results section on single-spine glutamate uncaging reports EPSP amplification, but no passage found in our copy addresses whether dendritic voltage signals enter spines without attenuation (searched for dendrite-to-spine propagation and spine-neck attenuation). (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Popovic et al., 2014 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTakasaki and Sabatini find a weak decrease of recovery time with spine head volume, whereas the equation suggests a linear increase.
“However, whereas the equation suggests a linear increase of the recovery time scale with spine head volume, Takasaki and Sabatini (2014) instead find a weak decrease.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Takasaki and Sabatini, 2014 source
The Modeling of diffusive compartmentalization section gives equation (3), in which recovery time increases linearly with spine head volume when the other parameters are held fixed. In Results (Figure 2E), the measured association is weakly negative (r = −0.19), but it is not statistically significant (p = 0.26). Describing it as a decrease the authors ‘find’ overstates that result. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGlutamate stimulation enhances exchange between synaptic and extrasynaptic receptor pools and increases overall motility of glutamate receptors.
“Glutamate stimulation enhances the exchange between these pools and increases overall motility of glutamate receptors (Tardin et al., 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Tardin et al., 2003 source
The Regulation of AMPARs mobility inside synapses section reports that bath-applied glutamate increased diffusion within synapses and reduced the proportion of immobile synaptic receptors. The Discussion links these changes to movement from synapses into extrasynaptic membrane, supporting enhanced exchange. But the same results section says extrasynaptic receptor diffusion was not significantly changed, so the claim of increased overall motility is broader than the finding. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOpening of sodium and calcium channels boosts local depolarization, while opening of potassium channels decreases local input resistance and results in smaller synaptic potentials.
“Opening of sodium and calcium channels boosts local depolarization (Araya et al., 2007; Bloodgood et al., 2009; Holbro et al., 2010; Carter et al., 2012; Hao and Oertner, 2012), while opening of potassium channels decreases local input resistance and results in smaller synaptic potentials (Ngo-Anh et al., 2005; Giessel and Sabatini, 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Araya et al., 2007 source
- cites Bloodgood et al., 2009 source
The Results section (‘Biphasic Synaptic Ca Influx and Graded Control by AMPARs’; page unavailable) says AMPARs modulate the amplitude of the synaptic potential in the spine, supporting a role for channel opening in local depolarization. But the paper describes voltage-gated calcium channels as being activated by synaptic depolarization, and says voltage-gated sodium channels were blocked in its experiments; it does not establish that opening both sodium and calcium channels boosts local depolarization. The potassium-channel clause is attributed to other citations, not this paper. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Holbro et al., 2010 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere is an inverse relation between spine neck diameter d and recovery time, which appears to follow the predicted inverse quadratic relation (τ ∝ 1/d2).
“Indeed, both groups find an inverse relation between spine neck diameter d and the recovery time, which appears to follow the predicted inverse quadratic relation (τ ∝ 1/d2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Takasaki and Sabatini, 2014 source
- cites Tønnesen et al., 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTruncated receptors void of any cytoplasmic tail can rescue the depletion of endogenous GluA1-3.
“a recent study suggests that truncated receptors void of any cytoplasmic tail can rescue the depletion of endogenous GluA1-3 (Granger et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Granger et al., 2013 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationReceptor turnover in spines is slower compared to non-spinal plasma membrane, and recovery in the spine neck and base is particularly slow.
“Studying the FRAP dynamics of a fusion of SEP with the AMPA receptor subunit GluA2 (SEP-GluA2) revealed that receptor turnover in spines is slower compared to non-spinal plasma membrane and that recovery in the spine neck and base is particularly slow (Ashby et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Ashby et al., 2006 source
In “Lateral diffusion is compartmentalized at spines” and “Diffusion of AMPARs in and out of spines is limited by the neck” (pages unavailable), the paper reports slower AMPA-receptor exchange in spine heads than in nonspiny membrane and slower diffusion in the neck. It does not support particularly slow recovery at the neck base: the latter section reports that the base and dendritic shaft had indistinguishable fluorescence-loss rates, indicating relatively rapid equilibration outside the spine. The regional neck/base comparison used FLIP, not FRAP recovery. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationA fraction of spines strongly deviated from the average trends, suggesting that small local constrictions, local protein accumulations and organelle positioning in the neck may create additional diffusion barriers.
“Interestingly, a fraction of spines strongly deviated from the average trends that were observed (Takasaki and Sabatini, 2014), suggesting that small local constrictions, local protein accumulations and organelle positioning in the neck may create additional diffusion barriers (Arellano et al., 2007; Yuste, 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Takasaki and Sabatini, 2014 source
- cites Arellano et al., 2007 source
The Results (Analysis of spine neck lengths and diameters; page unavailable) say neck diameter varies along its length, supporting the possibility of local constrictions. The Introduction links spine necks to calcium compartmentalization, but our copy does not say that local protein accumulations or organelle positioning create additional diffusion barriers. The observation that some spines deviated from average trends is cited to Takasaki and Sabatini, not to Arellano. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Yuste, 2013 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSEP fluorescence is quenched in acidified endosomal compartments but not in the extracellular environment after incorporation into the plasma membrane.
“whose fluorescence is quenched in the acidified endosomal compartments, but not in the extracellular environment after incorporation into the plasma membrane.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Miesenböck et al., 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Ashby et al., 2004 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCrowding in the spine head may contribute to diffusional trapping of receptors.
“Based on results from modeling (Renner et al., 2009) it has been suggested that crowding in the spine head may contribute to this phenomenon (Colgan and Yasuda, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Renner et al., 2009 source
The Discussion says that obstacles at postsynaptic membranes increase apparent viscosity and favor receptor trapping. In “Diffusion of QD-ChTx depends on cytoskeleton integrity,” the authors describe the postsynaptic membrane as probably crowded and say crowding restricts diffusion. The copy does not establish crowding throughout the spine head or present this as a result of modeling; the reported measurements primarily track lipid-bound probes. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Colgan and Yasuda, 2014 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationInduction of plasticity results in an increase in spine size and changes in spine shape.
“Interestingly, induction of plasticity not only results in an increase in spine size (Matsuzaki et al., 2004; Tanaka et al., 2008), but also in changes in spine shape (Grunditz et al., 2008), with consequences for compartmentalization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe actin cytoskeleton mediates receptor positioning and its depolymerization reduces glutamate receptor accumulations in spines.
“Lastly, the actin cytoskeleton is known to mediate receptor positioning (Gudheti et al., 2013) and its depolymerization was shown to reduce glutamate receptor accumulations in spines (Allison et al., 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Gudheti et al., 2013 source
The Introduction and the section on HA clusters show that actin affects the distribution and clustering of the membrane protein influenza hemagglutinin (HA). This supports the general idea of actin-mediated membrane-protein positioning, but the paper’s own findings concern HA, not receptor positioning specifically. The separate claim about glutamate receptors is attributed to Allison et al. (2000), not to this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Allison et al., 2000 source
The introduction (page not specified) reports that AMPA-receptor clustering is strongly dependent on F-actin, citing the authors’ earlier study. But the Results section says NMDA-receptor NR2A clusters remained after actin depolymerization. The claim omits this receptor-type distinction and presents the reduction as a finding of the 2000 study itself. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBased on electron microscopy, three shape categories have been defined: thin, filopodia-like protrusions ("thin spines"), short spines without a well-defined spine neck ("stubby spines") and spines with a large bulbous head ("mushroom spines").
“Based on electron microscopy (EM), three shape categories have been defined: thin, filopodia-like protrusions (“thin spines”), short spines without a well-defined spine neck (“stubby spines”) and spines with a large bulbous head (“mushroom spines”) (Bourne and Harris, 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bourne and Harris, 2008 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTypical spine dimensions are ~<1 μm for the head diameter, and a ~100 nm wide and ~1 μm long spine neck, but notable differences in spine morphology exist.
“Typical dimensions are ~<1 μm for the head diameter, and a ~100 nm wide and ~1 μm long spine neck, but notable differences in spine morphology exist (Bourne and Harris, 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bourne and Harris, 2008 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).
Interpretationnone givenTo what extent compartmentalization is governed by spine morphology, and in particular the diameter of the spine neck, has remained unresolved.
“However, to what extent compartmentalization is governed by spine morphology, and in particular the diameter of the spine neck, has remained unresolved.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBecause combining two-photon live imaging with post hoc serial sectioning EM requires fixing the sample, this approach might not detect all morphological changes that occur upon specific stimuli and is prone to morphological artifacts.
“As this requires fixing the sample, this approach might not detect all morphological changes that occur upon specific stimuli and is prone to morphological artifacts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationRESOLFT requires orders of magnitude less light intensity and has been demonstrated on living brain slices.
“This approach requires orders of magnitude of less light intensity and has been demonstrated on living brain slices (Testa et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Testa et al., 2012 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMore recent modeling studies report that shape should also affect lateral diffusion of proteins embedded in the plasma membrane.
“In addition, more recent modeling studies report that shape should also affect lateral diffusion of proteins embedded in the plasma membrane (Kusters et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kusters et al., 2013 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNot all neurons have spines (e.g., stellate neurons) and they can receive excitatory input directly on their shafts.
“However, not all neurons have spines (e.g., stellate neurons) and they can receive excitatory input directly on their shafts (Anderson et al., 1994).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Anderson et al., 1994 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMore recent measurements have found neck diameters as low as 51 nm in organotypic cultures and 59 nm in acute slices.
“whereas more recent measurements have found neck diameters as low as 51 nm in organotypic cultures and 59 nm in acute slices (Tønnesen et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tønnesen et al., 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe actin cytoskeleton provides tracks for myosin-based transport of various cellular materials in and out of spines, including AMPA-type glutamate receptors.
“In addition, the actin cytoskeleton provides tracks for myosin-based transport of various cellular materials in and out of spines, including AMPA-type glutamate receptors (Kneussel and Wagner, 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kneussel and Wagner, 2013 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRapid polymerization and depolymerization of actin filaments produces protrusive forces that can quickly change neuronal morphology.
“The rapid polymerization and depolymerization of actin filaments produces protrusive forces that can quickly change neuronal morphology (Kessels et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kessels et al., 2011 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNeuronal activity in vitro and experience in vivo can alter spine morphology.
“For example, neuronal activity in vitro and experience in vivo can alter spine morphology (Holtmaat and Svoboda, 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Holtmaat and Svoboda, 2009 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTwo-color detection has been established using spectral unmixing of either pairs of organic dyes or the fluorescent proteins YFP and GFP.
“In addition, two-color detection has been established using spectral unmixing of either pairs of organic dyes (Tønnesen et al., 2011) or the fluorescent proteins YFP and GFP (Bethge et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Tønnesen et al., 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Bethge et al., 2013 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationA small neck should slow diffusion and result in functional compartmentalization by preventing signaling molecules to escape from the spine.
“A small neck should slow diffusion and result in functional compartmentalization by preventing signaling molecules to escape from the spine.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSerial-sectioning EM directly visualizes all tissue surrounding spines as well as the structure of the postsynaptic specialization and has been used to identify precise morphological changes upon specific stimuli.
“Serial-sectioning EM directly visualizes all tissue surrounding spines as well as the structure of the postsynaptic specialization and has been used to identify precise morphological changes upon specific stimuli (Bourne and Harris, 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bourne and Harris, 2008 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTwo-photon microscopy rapidly became the method of choice for deep tissue imaging and has even enabled intravital brain imaging in mice.
“Two-photon microscopy rapidly became the method of choice for deep tissue imaging and has even enabled intravital brain imaging in mice (Svoboda and Yasuda, 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Svoboda and Yasuda, 2006 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe actin cytoskeleton plays a key role in shaping dendritic spines and is critically important for numerous processes that contribute to the plasticity of synaptic function.
“The actin cytoskeleton plays a key role in shaping dendritic spines and is critically important for numerous processes that contribute to the plasticity of synaptic function (Matus, 2000; Hering and Sheng, 2001; Luo, 2002; Ethell and Pasquale, 2005; Hotulainen and Hoogenraad, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCalcium can also be removed from spines by absorption into the smooth endoplasmic reticulum located in spines or by Na/Ca exchangers located in the plasma membrane.
“In addition to diffusion into the dendritic shaft, calcium can also be removed from spines by absorption into the smooth endoplasmic reticulum located in spines or by Na/Ca exchangers located in the plasma membrane (Sabatini et al., 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sabatini et al., 2002 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLateral diffusion of receptors through the plasma membrane and activity-triggered exocytosis of receptors from internal endosomal compartments are generally accepted regulation mechanisms for synaptic plasticity.
“Lateral diffusion of receptors through the plasma membrane and activity-triggered exocytosis of receptors from internal endosomal compartments have become generally accepted regulation mechanisms for synaptic plasticity, although their respective contributions have remained unresolved”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe precise crosstalk and integration of Rho, Cdc42 and Rac is not completely understood.
“The precise crosstalk and integration is however not completely understood (Kennedy et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kennedy et al., 2005 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe spread of signaling activity depends on three factors: (1) the extent and persistence of the upstream activation event; (2) the diffusion rate of the signaling molecule; and (3) its inactivation kinetics.
“The spread of their signaling activity depends on three factors: (1) the extent and persistence of the upstream activation event; (2) the diffusion rate of the signaling molecule; and (3) its inactivation kinetics, see Figure 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationIf calcium-permeable ion channels were distributed equally throughout the plasma membrane, one would expect a higher effective concentration of these channels in spines compared to dendrites as the surface-to-volume ratio of the former is higher. This should theoretically lead to a higher influx of calcium in spines than in the surrounding dendrite.
“If these ion channels were distributed equally throughout the plasma membrane, one would expect a higher effective concentration of these channels in spines compared to dendrites as the surface-to-volume ratio of the former is higher. This should theoretically lead to a higher influx of calcium in spines than in the surrounding dendrite (Sabatini et al., 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sabatini et al., 2002 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe high input resistance of spines may further facilitate synaptic potentials inside spines compared to equally strong synapses onto the dendritic shaft.
“In addition, the high input resistance of spines may further facilitate synaptic potentials inside spines compared to equally strong synapses onto the dendritic shaft.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCytoplasmic tails of GluA receptors differentially regulate receptor diffusion and trapping at synapses.
“Whereas previously the cytoplasmic tails of GluA receptors have been shown to differentially regulate receptor diffusion and trapping at synapses (Passafaro et al., 2001)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Passafaro et al., 2001 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBiochemical signaling, membrane-bound receptor dynamics and electrical signaling all contribute to proper information processing in the dendritic arbor and are interconnected.
“All of these levels contribute to proper information processing in the dendritic arbor and are interconnected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationTønnesen et al. report a quadratic dependence on head width w, whereas the model predicts a w3 dependence.
“Similarly, Tønnesen et al. (2014) report a quadratic dependence on head width w, whereas the model predicts a w3 dependence (assuming a spherical spine head in which V ∝ w3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tønnesen et al., 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The spine head can be approximated as spherical for relating head width to volume.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningSpine neck resistance values have varied over a wide range and are strongly influenced by the methods and theoretical models used.
“The resulting values for the spine neck resistance have varied over a wide range and are strongly influenced by the methods and theoretical models used.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationDendritic spines may serve as electrical compartments.
“In addition to inducing compartmentalization of biochemical signals and receptors, it has been suggested that dendritic spines may also serve as electrical compartments (Segev and Rall, 1998; Yuste, 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationVoltage-dependent ion channels are present within spines and activation of these channels results in a change of local membrane potential.
“Voltage-dependent ion channels are present within spines and activation of these channels results in a change of local membrane potential.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAMPA receptors tagged with QDs selectively reduce their mobility at active synapses while freely diffusing through non-active synapses.
“AMPA receptors tagged with QDs were reported to selectively reduce their mobility at active synapse while they freely diffused through non-active synapses (Ehlers et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ehlers et al., 2007 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe reduction in electrical compartmentalization occurs while chemical compartmentalization is preserved, reflecting two separate functions of spines within the dendrite.
“Interestingly, it was suggested that the reduction in electrical compartmentalization occurs while chemical compartmentalization is preserved, reflecting two separate functions of spines within the dendrite.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCalcium elevations generally slow diffusion and locally accumulate AMPA receptors.
“Calcium elevations were shown to generally slow diffusion and locally accumulate AMPA receptors (Borgdorff and Choquet, 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Borgdorff and Choquet, 2002 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe respective contributions of lateral diffusion and activity-triggered exocytosis to synaptic plasticity remain unresolved.
“although their respective contributions have remained unresolved (Passafaro et al., 2001; Borgdorff and Choquet, 2002; Adesnik et al., 2005; Ashby et al., 2006; Park et al., 2006; Ehlers et al., 2007; Heine et al., 2008; Newpher and Ehlers, 2008; Yang et al., 2008; Kennedy et al., 2010; Opazo and Choquet, 2011; Czöndör et al., 2012; Czöndör and Thoumine, 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
PremisecitationGlutamate receptors reversibly stop at synaptic sites, modulated by neuronal activity levels that affect calcium transients.
“The earliest report used latex beads coupled to GluA2 receptors and found that these receptors reversibly stop at synaptic sites.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationDecreasing neck radius and increasing neck length effectively increase the confinement of receptors at the synapse.
“In combination with an exocytic event in the head of the spine, a decreasing neck radius and increasing neck length effectively increase the confinement of receptors at the synapse, as can be seen in Figure 3B showing the time-evolution of receptor concentration after the release of 1000 receptors at the top of the spine (Kusters et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kusters et al., 2013 source
The paper relies on this without support.
The majority of excitatory inputs in the central nervous system are located at dendritic spines.
“The majority of excitatory inputs in the central nervous system are located at dendritic spines.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The spine head can be approximated as spherical for relating head width to volume.
“assuming a spherical spine head in which V ∝ w3”
Cites
Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy
Denk, W., Strickler, J. H., & Webb, W. W. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2321027 · Cited by 9,488 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Two-photon microscopy overcomes both of these limitations through the use of a pulsed infrared light source that excites fluorophores by the combined energy of two photons arriving on the sample nearly simultaneously (Denk et al., 1990; Svoboda et al., 1996).”
Hell, S. W. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1137395 · Cited by 2,967 · cited 4× · see citing works
“The conventional excitation beam is complemented with a depletion beam that forms a donut shaped spot surrounding the focus of the excitation beam (Klar et al., 2000; Hell, 2007).”
InfluentialAMPA Receptor Trafficking and Synaptic Plasticity
Malinow, R., & Malenka, R. C. (2002) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142758 · Cited by 2,588 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Mushroom shaped spines were found to retain AMPA receptors in the vicinity of the synapse for an increased period of time (Ashby et al., 2006; Ehlers et al., 2007; Opazo and Choquet, 2011, see Figure 3A ).”
Visualizing secretion and synaptic transmission with pH-sensitive green fluorescent proteins
Miesenböck, G., Angelis, D. A. D., & Rothman, J. E. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/28190 · Cited by 2,569 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…of bulk AMPA receptor mobility has been greatly facilitated by the generation of a pH sensitive GFP variant, called superecliptic pHluorin (SEP; Miesenböck et al., 1998; Ashby et al., 2004), whose fluorescence is quenched in the acidified endosomal compartments, but not in the extracellular…”
Structural basis of long-term potentiation in single dendritic spines
Matsuzaki, M., Honkura, N., Ellis-Davies, G. C. R., & Kasai, H. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02617 · Cited by 2,500 · cited 6× · see citing works
“…voltage signals from the dendrite propagate without attenuation into the spines (Holthoff et al., 2010; Carter et al., 2012; Popovic et al., 2014), but synaptic potentials generated inside the spine head are filtered when they travel to the dendrite (Araya et al., 2006, 2014; Harnett et al., 2012).”
InfluentialMolecular anatomy of a trafficking organelle
Takamori, S., Holt, M., Stenius, K., Lemke, E. A., Grønborg, M., Riedel, D., Urlaub, H., Schenck, S., Brügger, B., Ringler, P., et al. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.10.030 · Cited by 2,373 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The dendritic membranes on which these receptors reside are, similar to other biological membranes, highly crowded structures (Takamori et al., 2006).”
Experience-dependent structural synaptic plasticity in the mammalian brain
Holtmaat, A., & Svoboda, K. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2699 · Cited by 1,934 · cited 4× · see citing works
“For example, neuronal activity in vitro and experience in vivo can alter spine morphology (Holtmaat and Svoboda, 2009).”
InfluentialLong-term in vivo imaging of experience-dependent synaptic plasticity in adult cortex
Trachtenberg, J. T., Chen, B. E., Knott, G. W., Feng, G., Sanes, J. R., Welker, E., & Svoboda, K. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01273 · Cited by 1,927 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…two-photon live imaging with post hoc serial sectioning EM to examine the microstructure of spine, for example to directly demonstrate synapse formation associated with the emergence of a new spine during live imaging (Trachtenberg et al., 2002; Holtmaat et al., 2006; Bourne and Harris, 2012).”
Fluorescence microscopy with diffraction resolution barrier broken by stimulated emission
Klar, T. A., Jakobs, S., Dyba, M., Egner, A., & Hell, S. W. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.15.8206 · Cited by 1,869 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The conventional excitation beam is complemented with a depletion beam that forms a donut shaped spot surrounding the focus of the excitation beam (Klar et al., 2000; Hell, 2007).”
Brownian motion in biological membranes
Saffman, P. G., & Delbrück, M. (1975) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.72.8.3111 · Cited by 1,773 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For flat membranes, Saffman and Delbruck (1975) predicted a logarithmic dependence of the diffusion coefficient with the “size” of the membrane, relative to the size of the protein.”
Axo-somatic and axo-dendritic synapses of the cerebral cortex: an electron microscope study.
Eg, G. (1959) · PubMed · Cited by 1,768 · see citing works
Super-resolution fluorescence microscopy
Huang, B., Bates, M., & Zhuang, X. (2009) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.061906.092014 · Cited by 1,657 · see citing works
Diffusion Dynamics of Glycine Receptors Revealed by Single-Quantum Dot Tracking
Dahan, M., Lévi, S., Luccardini, C., Rostaing, P., Riveau, B., & Triller, A. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1088525 · Cited by 1,476 · see citing works
Morphological Changes in Dendritic Spines Associated with Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity
Yuste, R., & Bonhoeffer, T. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.1071 · Cited by 1,269 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Such functional and structural changes of spines and synapses are believed to be at the core of learning and memory in the brain (Yuste and Bonhoeffer, 2001; Holtmaat and Svoboda, 2009; Kasai et al., 2010).”
AMPA receptor trafficking at excitatory synapses
Bredt, D. S., & Nicoll, R. A. (2003) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00640-8 · Cited by 1,150 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Controlled addition and removal of AMPA-type glutamate receptors from the postsynaptic density is believed to underlie the changes in synaptic strength during learning and memory formation (Malinow and Malenka, 2002; Sheng and Kim, 2002; Bredt and Nicoll, 2003; Collingridge et al., 2004).”
Regulatory phosphorylation of AMPA-type glutamate receptors by CaM-KII during long-term potentiation
Barria, A., Muller, D., Derkach, V., Griffith, L. C., & Soderling, T. R. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5321.2042 · Cited by 1,049 · cited 5× · see citing works
“It should be noted that these results based on single spine stimulations contrast earlier biochemical studies that reported persistent phosphorylation of CaMKII upon more global induction of LTP (Fukunaga et al., 1995; Barria et al., 1997; Lisman and Zhabotinsky, 2001).”
InfluentialReceptor trafficking and synaptic plasticity
Collingridge, G. L., Isaac, J. T. R., & Wang, Y. T. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1556 · Cited by 1,046 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Controlled addition and removal of AMPA-type glutamate receptors from the postsynaptic density is believed to underlie the changes in synaptic strength during learning and memory formation (Malinow and Malenka, 2002; Sheng and Kim, 2002; Bredt and Nicoll, 2003; Collingridge et al., 2004).”
Principles of two-photon excitation microscopy and its applications to neuroscience
Svoboda, K., & Yasuda, R. (2006) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.05.019 · Cited by 1,027 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Two-photon microscopy rapidly became the method of choice for deep tissue imaging and has even enabled intravital brain imaging in mice (Svoboda and Yasuda, 2006).”
Dentritic spines : structure, dynamics and regulation
Hering, H., & Sheng, M. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35104061 · Cited by 961 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The actin cytoskeleton plays a key role in shaping dendritic spines and is critically important for numerous processes that contribute to the plasticity of synaptic function (Matus, 2000; Hering and Sheng, 2001; Luo, 2002; Ethell and Pasquale, 2005; Hotulainen and Hoogenraad, 2010).”
Dendritic spines as basic functional units of neuronal integration
Yuste, R., & Denk, W. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/375682a0 · Cited by 950 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Pioneering two-photon microscopy of calcium dynamics in slices of hippocampal neurons revealed that synaptic stimulation results in accumulation of calcium ions in single spines (Yuste and Denk, 1995).”
Balancing Structure and Function at Hippocampal Dendritic Spines
Bourne, J. N., & Harris, K. M. (2008) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125646 · Cited by 916 · cited 8× · see citing works
“Based on electron microscopy (EM), three shape categories have been defined: thin, filopodia-like protrusions (“thin spines”), short spines without a well-defined spine neck (“stubby spines”) and spines with a large bulbous head (“mushroom spines”) (Bourne and Harris, 2008).”
InfluentialActin-based plasticity in dendritic spines
Matus, A. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5492.754 · Cited by 815 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The actin cytoskeleton plays a key role in shaping dendritic spines and is critically important for numerous processes that contribute to the plasticity of synaptic function (Matus, 2000; Hering and Sheng, 2001; Luo, 2002; Ethell and Pasquale, 2005; Hotulainen and Hoogenraad, 2010).”
Actin in dendritic spines: connecting dynamics to function
Hotulainen, P., & Hoogenraad, C. C. (2010) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201003008 · Cited by 815 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The actin cytoskeleton plays a key role in shaping dendritic spines and is critically important for numerous processes that contribute to the plasticity of synaptic function (Matus, 2000; Hering and Sheng, 2001; Luo, 2002; Ethell and Pasquale, 2005; Hotulainen and Hoogenraad, 2010).”
Self-citationStructural dynamics of dendritic spines in memory and cognition
Kasai, H., Fukuda, M., Watanabe, S., Hayashi-Takagi, A., & Noguchi, J. (2010) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2010.01.001 · Cited by 804 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Such functional and structural changes of spines and synapses are believed to be at the core of learning and memory in the brain (Yuste and Bonhoeffer, 2001; Holtmaat and Svoboda, 2009; Kasai et al., 2010).”
Ras and Rap control AMPA receptor trafficking during synaptic plasticity
Zhu, J. J., Qin, Y., Zhao, M., Van Aelst, L., & Malinow, R. (2002) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00897-8 · Cited by 769 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In addition, Rho-Rock and Ras-ERK signaling pathways lower the threshold for LTP in neighboring spines (Zhu et al., 2002; Harvey and Svoboda, 2007; Harvey et al., 2008; Lee et al., 2009).”
The Life Cycle of Ca2+ Ions in Dendritic Spines
Sabatini, B. L., Oertner, T. G., & Svoboda, K. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00573-1 · Cited by 745 · see citing works
Postsynaptic signaling and plasticity mechanisms
Sheng, M., & Kim, M. J. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1075333 · Cited by 731 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Controlled addition and removal of AMPA-type glutamate receptors from the postsynaptic density is believed to underlie the changes in synaptic strength during learning and memory formation (Malinow and Malenka, 2002; Sheng and Kim, 2002; Bredt and Nicoll, 2003; Collingridge et al., 2004).”
Activation of CaMKII in single dendritic spines during long-term potentiation
Lee, S.-J. R., Escobedo-Lozoya, Y., Szatmari, E. M., & Yasuda, R. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07842 · Cited by 685 · cited 19× · see citing works
“The activation of Ras measured by FRET-FLIM was dependent on CaMKII activation, peaked later, and recovered to baseline level only after 15 min.”
InfluentialActin Cytoskeleton Regulation in Neuronal Morphogenesis and Structural Plasticity
Luo, L. (2002) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.18.031802.150501 · Cited by 658 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The actin cytoskeleton plays a key role in shaping dendritic spines and is critically important for numerous processes that contribute to the plasticity of synaptic function (Matus, 2000; Hering and Sheng, 2001; Luo, 2002; Ethell and Pasquale, 2005; Hotulainen and Hoogenraad, 2010).”
Subunit-specific temporal and spatial patterns of AMPA receptor exocytosis in hippocampal neurons
Passafaro, M., Piëch, V., & Sheng, M. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn0901-917 · Cited by 655 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…have become generally accepted regulation mechanisms for synaptic plasticity, although their respective contributions have remained unresolved (Passafaro et al., 2001; Borgdorff and Choquet, 2002; Adesnik et al., 2005; Ashby et al., 2006; Park et al., 2006; Ehlers et al., 2007; Heine et al.,…”
Experience-dependent and cell-type-specific spine growth in the neocortex
Holtmaat, A., Wilbrecht, L., Knott, G. W., Welker, E., & Svoboda, K. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04783 · Cited by 631 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…two-photon live imaging with post hoc serial sectioning EM to examine the microstructure of spine, for example to directly demonstrate synapse formation associated with the emergence of a new spine during live imaging (Trachtenberg et al., 2002; Holtmaat et al., 2006; Bourne and Harris, 2012).”
Locally dynamic synaptic learning rules in pyramidal neuron dendrites
Harvey, C. D., & Svoboda, K. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06416 · Cited by 625 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In addition, Rho-Rock and Ras-ERK signaling pathways lower the threshold for LTP in neighboring spines (Zhu et al., 2002; Harvey and Svoboda, 2007; Harvey et al., 2008; Lee et al., 2009).”
Nair, D., Hosy, E., Petersen, J. D., Constals, A., Giannone, G., Choquet, D., & Sibarita, J.-B. (2013) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2381-12.2013 · Cited by 617 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In addition, recent studies have shown that glutamate receptors localize to submicron scale clusters within the synaptic membrane as shown by various techniques ranging from EM to PALM microscopy (Ehlers et al., 2007; MacGillavry et al., 2013; Nair et al., 2013).”
Protein synthesis and neurotrophin-dependent structural plasticity of single dendritic spines
Tanaka, J.-I., Horiike, Y., Matsuzaki, M., Miyazaki, T., Ellis-Davies, G. C. R., & Kasai, H. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1152864 · Cited by 615 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Interestingly, induction of plasticity not only results in an increase in spine size (Matsuzaki et al., 2004; Tanaka et al., 2008), but also in changes in spine shape (Grunditz et al., 2008), with consequences for compartmentalization.”
A simple, versatile method for GFP-based super-resolution microscopy via nanobodies
Ries, J., Kaplan, C., Platonova, E., Eghlidi, H., & Ewers, H. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1991 · Cited by 573 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Nevertheless, several groups have succeeded in live-imaging of dendritic spines using these techniques: spine morphology has been probed using labeled antibodies against membrane-bound proteins (Giannone et al., 2010; Ries et al., 2012), using genetically encoded fluorophores that either directly label or transiently…”
Local, persistent activation of Rho GTPases during plasticity of single dendritic spines
Murakoshi, H., Wang, H., & Yasuda, R. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09823 · Cited by 564 · cited 7× · see citing works
“CaMKII-Cdc42-Pak signaling increases spine volume and synaptic strength (Murakoshi et al., 2011), while Rho signaling leads to local AMPA receptor integration in the dendrite (Patterson et al., 2010).”
InfluentialRegulation of AMPA receptor lateral movements
Borgdorff, A. J., & Choquet, D. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00780 · Cited by 542 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…accepted regulation mechanisms for synaptic plasticity, although their respective contributions have remained unresolved (Passafaro et al., 2001; Borgdorff and Choquet, 2002; Adesnik et al., 2005; Ashby et al., 2006; Park et al., 2006; Ehlers et al., 2007; Heine et al., 2008; Newpher and…”
Ultrastructure of dendritic spines: correlation between synaptic and spine morphologies
Arellano, J. I. (2007) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/neuro.01.1.1.010.2007 · Cited by 529 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…fraction of spines strongly deviated from the average trends that were observed (Takasaki and Sabatini, 2014), suggesting that small local constrictions, local protein accumulations and organelle positioning in the neck may create additional diffusion barriers (Arellano et al., 2007; Yuste, 2013).”
Surface Mobility of Postsynaptic AMPARs Tunes Synaptic Transmission
Heine, M., Groc, L., Frischknecht, R., Béïque, J.-C., Lounis, B., Rumbaugh, G., Huganir, R. L., Cognet, L., & Choquet, D. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1152089 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
Shim, S.-H., Xia, C., Zhong, G., Babcock, H. P., Vaughan, J. C., Huang, B., Wang, X., Xu, C., Bi, G.-Q., & Zhuang, X. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1201882109 · Cited by 514 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…membrane-bound proteins (Giannone et al., 2010; Ries et al., 2012), using genetically encoded fluorophores that either directly label or transiently bind to actin (Frost et al., 2010; Izeddin et al., 2011), or using a lipophilic cyanine dye that labels the plasma membrane (Shim et al., 2012).”
Diffraction-unlimited all-optical imaging and writing with a photochromic GFP
Grotjohann, T., Testa, I., Leutenegger, M., Bock, H., Urban, N. T., Lavoie-Cardinal, F., Willig, K. I., Eggeling, C., Jakobs, S., & Hell, S. W. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10497 · Cited by 501 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In addition, we review the evidence for specific biochemical compartmentalization of calcium ions and signaling molecules.”
AMPA Receptor Incorporation into Synapses during LTP: The Role of Lateral Movement and Exocytosis
Makino, H., & Malinow, R. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.08.035 · Cited by 501 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For flat membranes, Saffman and Delbruck (1975) predicted a logarithmic dependence of the diffusion coefficient with the “size” of the membrane, relative to the size of the protein.”
Plasticity-induced growth of dendritic spines by exocytic trafficking from recycling endosomes
Park, M., Salgado, J. M., Ostroff, L., Helton, T. D., Robinson, C. G., Harris, K. M., & Ehlers, M. D. (2006) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.040 · Cited by 493 · cited 2× · see citing works
“These endosomes, necessary for the delivery and the retrieval of receptors, have been found to operate both close to the synapse, within the head of the spine and in the dendritic shaft (Park et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2008).”
Lisman (2001) · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00364-6 · Cited by 480 · cited 2× · see citing works
“It should be noted that these results based on single spine stimulations contrast earlier biochemical studies that reported persistent phosphorylation of CaMKII upon more global induction of LTP (Fukunaga et al., 1995; Barria et al., 1997; Lisman and Zhabotinsky, 2001).”
Direct measurement of coupling between dendritic spines and shafts
Svoboda, K., Tank, D. W., & Denk, W. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.272.5262.716 · Cited by 472 · cited 6× · see citing works
“Two-photon microscopy overcomes both of these limitations through the use of a pulsed infrared light source that excites fluorophores by the combined energy of two photons arriving on the sample nearly simultaneously (Denk et al., 1990; Svoboda et al., 1996).”
InfluentialSynaptic clustering of AMPA receptors by the extracellular immediate-early gene product narp.
O’Brien, R. J., Xu, D., Petralia, R. S., Steward, O., Huganir, R. L., & Worley, P. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80782-5 · Cited by 471 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Cell adhesion complexes have also been identified as diffusion barriers for membrane proteins (O’Brien et al., 1999; Saglietti et al., 2007).”
Myosin Vb mobilizes recycling endosomes and AMPA receptors for postsynaptic plasticity
Wang, Z., Edwards, J. G., Riley, N., Provance, D. W., Karcher, R., Li, X.-D., Davison, I. G., Ikebe, M., Mercer, J. A., Kauer, J. A., et al. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.057 · Cited by 470 · see citing works
Lledo, P. M., Hjelmstad, G. O., Mukherji, S., Soderling, T. R., Malenka, R. C., & Nicoll, R. A. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.24.11175 · Cited by 456 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Calcium ions play a crucial role in initiating downstream signaling during long-term potentiation (LTP) and depression (LTD) and influx of calcium is both necessary and sufficient for structural synaptic plasticity (Pettit et al., 1994; Lledo et al., 1995; Otmakhov et al., 2004).”
Spine neck plasticity regulates compartmentalization of synapses
Tønnesen, J., Katona, G., Rózsa, B., & Nägerl, U. V. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3682 · Cited by 444 · cited 10× · see citing works
“Most recently, STED microscopy on dendritic spines in organotypic and acute slices suggested that electric compartmentalization is moderate, but not absent, in most spines (Takasaki and Sabatini, 2014; Tønnesen et al., 2014).”
InfluentialNanoscale Scaffolding Domains within the Postsynaptic Density Concentrate Synaptic AMPA Receptors
MacGillavry, H. D., Song, Y., Raghavachari, S., & Blanpied, T. A. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.009 · Cited by 442 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In addition, recent studies have shown that glutamate receptors localize to submicron scale clusters within the synaptic membrane as shown by various techniques ranging from EM to PALM microscopy (Ehlers et al., 2007; MacGillavry et al., 2013; Nair et al., 2013).”
SK channels and NMDA receptors form a Ca2+-mediated feedback loop in dendritic spines
Ngo‐Anh, T. J., Bloodgood, B. L., Lin, M., Sabatini, B. L., Maylie, J., & Adelman, J. P. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1449 · Cited by 442 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…local depolarization (Araya et al., 2007; Bloodgood et al., 2009; Holbro et al., 2010; Carter et al., 2012; Hao and Oertner, 2012), while opening of potassium channels decreases local input resistance and results in smaller synaptic potentials (Ngo-Anh et al., 2005; Giessel and Sabatini, 2010).”
The Spread of Ras Activity Triggered by Activation of a Single Dendritic Spine
Harvey, C. D., Yasuda, R., Zhong, H., & Svoboda, K. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1159675 · Cited by 434 · cited 13× · see citing works
“The activation of Ras measured by FRET-FLIM was dependent on CaMKII activation, peaked later, and recovered to baseline level only after 15 min.”
InfluentialSpine-Neck Geometry Determines NMDA Receptor-Dependent Ca2+ Signaling in Dendrites
Noguchi, J., Matsuzaki, M., Ellis-Davies, G. C. R., & Kasai, H. (2005) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.03.015 · Cited by 419 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…morphology does play a role, as long and thin necks prevent the diffusion of calcium, whereas shorter and thicker necks allow for better diffusional coupling with the dendrite (Majewska et al., 2000; Holthoff et al., 2002; Sabatini et al., 2002; Korkotian et al., 2004; Noguchi et al., 2005).”
Structural plasticity of dendritic spines
Bosch, M., & Hayashi, Y. (2012) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2011.09.002 · Cited by 415 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, during spine enlargement, rapid actin polymerization provides the mechanical force required for pushing out the spine membrane (Bosch and Hayashi, 2012).”
Dynamic Superresolution Imaging of Endogenous Proteins on Living Cells at Ultra-High Density
Giannone, G., Hosy, E., Levet, F., Constals, A., Schulze, K., Sobolevsky, A. I., Rosconi, M. P., Gouaux, E., Tampé, R., Choquet, D., et al. (2010) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2010.06.005 · Cited by 415 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Nevertheless, several groups have succeeded in live-imaging of dendritic spines using these techniques: spine morphology has been probed using labeled antibodies against membrane-bound proteins (Giannone et al., 2010; Ries et al., 2012), using genetically encoded fluorophores that either directly label or transiently…”
Live-cell imaging of dendritic spines by STED microscopy
Nägerl, U. V., Willig, K. I., Hein, B., Hell, S. W., & Bonhoeffer, T. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0810028105 · Cited by 412 · cited 4× · see citing works
“We first discuss studies that examined the cytoplasmic coupling between spines and the dendritic shaft as a general measure of spine head isolation.”
InfluentialDirect imaging of lateral movements of AMPA receptors inside synapses
Tardin, C., Cognet, L., Bats, C., Lounis, B., & Choquet, D. (2003) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/cdg463 · Cited by 384 · cited 2× · see citing works
“However, how crowding exactly affects the diffusion on highly curved structures remains elusive and will be the focus of future experimental and theoretical studies.”
Nolte, J. (2007) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-03409-8.50009-9 · Cited by 384 · see citing works
Textura del Sistema Nervioso del Hombre y de los Vertebrados, 1899–1904
y Cajal, S. R. (2019) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691183978-016 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Rho proteins, mental retardation and the cellular basis of cognition
Ramakers, G. J. A. (2002) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(00)02118-4 · Cited by 374 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Downstream of CaMKII, Ras and Rho GTPases are important for regulating spine morphology (Ramakers, 2002; Saneyoshi et al., 2010) and synaptic strength (Zhu et al.”
Christof Koch, A., & Zador, A. M. (1993) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.13-02-00413.1993 · Cited by 374 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…literature either discusses theoretical work or indirectly calculated spine neck resistances based on diffusional coupling of cytoplasm (Shepherd, 1996; Svoboda et al., 1996; Tsay and Yuste, 2004) and often relies on static morphology data from EM (Harris and Stevens, 1988; Koch and Zador, 1993).”
Nanoscopy in a living mouse brain
Berning, S., Willig, K. I., Steffens, H., Dibaj, P., & Hell, S. W. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1215369 · Cited by 363 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Recently, STED microscopy has also been established in vivo in mouse brain (Berning et al., 2012).”
Glutamate receptor dynamics in dendritic microdomains.
Newpher, T. M., & Ehlers, M. D. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.030 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Molecular mechanisms of dendritic spine development and remodeling
Ethell, I. M., & Pasquale, E. B. (2005) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.02.003 · Cited by 349 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The actin cytoskeleton plays a key role in shaping dendritic spines and is critically important for numerous processes that contribute to the plasticity of synaptic function (Matus, 2000; Hering and Sheng, 2001; Luo, 2002; Ethell and Pasquale, 2005; Hotulainen and Hoogenraad, 2010).”
Neuronal activity regulates diffusion across the neck of dendritic spines
Bloodgood, B. L., & Sabatini, B. L. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1114816 · Cited by 344 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In a small population of spines, no exchange of soluble fluorescent proteins between shaft and spine heads could be measured during a period of several minutes (Bloodgood and Sabatini, 2005).”
Extracellular interactions between GluR2 and N-cadherin in spine regulation
Saglietti, L., Dequidt, C., Kamieniarz, K., Rousset, M.-C., Valnegri, P., Thoumine, O., Beretta, F., Fagni, L., Choquet, D., Sala, C., et al. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.04.012 · Cited by 341 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Cell adhesion complexes have also been identified as diffusion barriers for membrane proteins (O’Brien et al., 1999; Saglietti et al., 2007).”
Ca(2+) signaling in dendritic spines.
Sabatini, B., Maravall, M., & Svoboda, K. (2001) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00218-x · Cited by 340 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In addition to the exchange of soluble dyes and fluorescent proteins between spines and dendrites, the diffusion of calcium ions has also been studied extensively (Bloodgood and Sabatini, 2007a).”
Pettit, D. L., Perlman, S., & Malinow, R. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7997883 · Cited by 329 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The study of bulk AMPA receptor mobility has been greatly facilitated by the generation of a pH sensitive GFP variant, called superecliptic pHluorin (SEP; Miesenböck et al., 1998; Ashby et al., 2004), whose fluorescence is quenched in the acidified endosomal compartments, but not in the extracellular…”
Okamoto, K.-I., Narayanan, R., Lee, S. H., Murata, K., & Hayashi, Y. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0701656104 · Cited by 328 · cited 4× · see citing works
“This means that voltage signals from the dendrite propagate without attenuation into the spines (Holthoff et al., 2010; Carter et al., 2012; Popovic et al., 2014), but synaptic potentials generated inside the spine head are filtered when they travel to the dendrite (Araya et al., 2006, 2014; Harnett et al., 2012).”
InfluentialHarris, K., & Stevens, J. (1988) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.08-12-04455.1988 · Cited by 318 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…literature either discusses theoretical work or indirectly calculated spine neck resistances based on diffusional coupling of cytoplasm (Shepherd, 1996; Svoboda et al., 1996; Tsay and Yuste, 2004) and often relies on static morphology data from EM (Harris and Stevens, 1988; Koch and Zador, 1993).”
Adaptive optics enables 3D STED microscopy in aberrating specimens
Gould, T. J., Burke, D. L., Bewersdorf, J., et al. (2012) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.20.020998 · Cited by 316 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, development of three-dimensional depletion patterns and compensation of optical distortions through adaptive optics promise improvements in the near future (Gould et al., 2012; Loew and Hell, 2013).”
LTP requires a reserve pool of glutamate receptors independent of subunit type
Granger, A. J., Shi, Y., Lu, W., Cerpas, M., & Nicoll, R. A. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11775 · Cited by 313 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…cytoplasmic tails of GluA receptors have been shown to differentially regulate receptor diffusion and trapping at synapses (Passafaro et al., 2001), a recent study suggests that truncated receptors void of any cytoplasmic tail can rescue the depletion of endogenous GluA1-3 (Granger et al., 2013).”
Ashby, M. C., Maier, S. R., Nishimune, A., & Henley, J. M. (2006) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1235-06.2006 · Cited by 302 · cited 8× · see citing works
“THE EFFECT OF SPINE SHAPE ON LATERAL DIFFUSION Several experiments have shown that two-dimensional diffusion of membrane markers and AMPA-type glutamate receptors is sensitive to the morphology of the dendritic spine (Ashby et al., 2006; Shim et al., 2012).”
InfluentialDiffusional trapping of GluR1 AMPA receptors by input-specific synaptic activity
Ehlers, M. D., Heine, M., Groc, L., Lee, M.-C., & Choquet, D. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.04.010 · Cited by 300 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Mushroom shaped spines were found to retain AMPA receptors in the vicinity of the synapse for an increased period of time (Ashby et al., 2006; Ehlers et al., 2007; Opazo and Choquet, 2011, see Figure 3A ).”
InfluentialSyntaxin-4 defines a domain for activity-dependent exocytosis in dendritic spines
Kennedy, M. J., Davison, I. G., Robinson, C. G., & Ehlers, M. D. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.042 · Cited by 294 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…the neck of a typical mushroom-shaped spines follows a power-law dependence on neck radius r , τ escape ∼ ( r neck ) as well as neck length l , where λ and η are positive constants, whose numerical value depends on the actual shape of the spine (Kusters et al., 2013; Kusters and Storm, 2014).”
Synaptic amplification by dendritic spines enhances input cooperativity
Harnett, M. T., Makara, J. K., Spruston, N., Kath, W. L., & Magee, J. C. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11554 · Cited by 288 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…voltage signals from the dendrite propagate without attenuation into the spines (Holthoff et al., 2010; Carter et al., 2012; Popovic et al., 2014), but synaptic potentials generated inside the spine head are filtered when they travel to the dendrite (Araya et al., 2006, 2014; Harnett et al., 2012).”
Integration of biochemical signalling in spines
Kennedy, M. B., Beale, H. C., Carlisle, H. J., & Washburn, L. R. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1685 · Cited by 286 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Calcium ions in dendritic spines have an important function in activating signaling cascades that underlie and regulate synaptic plasticity (Kennedy et al., 2005).”
Surface trafficking of receptors between synaptic and extrasynaptic membranes: and yet they do move!
Triller, A., & Choquet, D. (2005) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2005.01.001 · Cited by 285 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Whereas reports based on static EM suggested that glutamate receptors are restricted to synapses (Nusser, 2000), live-cell imaging techniques like FRAP and single molecule tracking changed this view radically (Richards et al., 2004; Triller and Choquet, 2005).”
Estructura de los centros nerviosos de las Aves
Ramon, Y., & Cajal, S. (1888) · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Bloodgood, B. L., & Sabatini, B. L. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.12.017 · Cited by 273 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Inaddition to the exchange of soluble dyes and fluorescent proteins between spines and dendrites, the diffusion of calcium ions has also been studied extensively (Bloodgood and Sabatini, 2007a).”
Textura del sistema nervioso del hombre y de los vertebrados
Agüeras, S. R. Y. C. (1992) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Frost, N. A., Shroff, H., Kong, H., Betzig, E., & Blanpied, T. A. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.05.026 · Cited by 263 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…membrane-bound proteins (Giannone et al., 2010; Ries et al., 2012), using genetically encoded fluorophores that either directly label or transiently bind to actin (Frost et al., 2010; Izeddin et al., 2011), or using a lipophilic cyanine dye that labels the plasma membrane (Shim et al., 2012).”
Patterson, M. A., Szatmari, E. M., & Yasuda, R. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0913875107 · Cited by 259 · cited 4× · see citing works
“CaMKII-Cdc42-Pak signaling increases spine volume and synaptic strength (Murakoshi et al., 2011), while Rho signaling leads to local AMPA receptor integration in the dendrite (Patterson et al., 2010).”
InfluentialOtmakhov, N., Tao-Cheng, J.-H., Carpenter, S., Asrican, B., Dosemeci, A., Reese, T. S., & Lisman, J. (2004) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2350-04.2004 · Cited by 258 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Calcium ions play a crucial role in initiating downstream signaling during long-term potentiation (LTP) and depression (LTD) and influx of calcium is both necessary and sufficient for structural synaptic plasticity (Pettit et al., 1994; Lledo et al., 1995; Otmakhov et al., 2004).”
The spine neck filters membrane potentials
Araya, R., Jiang, J., Eisenthal, K. B., & Yuste, R. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0608755103 · Cited by 258 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…voltage signals from the dendrite propagate without attenuation into the spines (Holthoff et al., 2010; Carter et al., 2012; Popovic et al., 2014), but synaptic potentials generated inside the spine head are filtered when they travel to the dendrite (Araya et al., 2006, 2014; Harnett et al., 2012).”
Majewska, A., Brown, E., Ross, J., & Yuste, R. (2000) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.20-05-01722.2000 · Cited by 248 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…morphology does play a role, as long and thin necks prevent the diffusion of calcium, whereas shorter and thicker necks allow for better diffusional coupling with the dendrite (Majewska et al., 2000; Holthoff et al., 2002; Sabatini et al., 2002; Korkotian et al., 2004; Noguchi et al., 2005).”
Allison, D. W., Chervin, A. S., Gelfand, V. I., & Craig, A. M. (2000) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.20-12-04545.2000 · Cited by 245 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Lastly, the actin cytoskeleton is known to mediate receptor positioning (Gudheti et al., 2013) and its depolymerization was shown to reduce glutamate receptor accumulations in spines (Allison et al., 2000).”
Ashby, M. C., De La Rue, S. A., Ralph, G. S., Uney, J., Collingridge, G. L., & Henley, J. M. (2004) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1042-04.2004 · Cited by 244 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The study of bulk AMPA receptor mobility has been greatly facilitated by the generation of a pH sensitive GFP variant, called superecliptic pHluorin (SEP; Miesenböck et al., 1998; Ashby et al., 2004), whose fluorescence is quenched in the acidified endosomal compartments, but not in the extracellular environment after…”
Yuste, R. (2010) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262013505.001.0001 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Two-photon excitation STED microscopy
Moneron, G., & Hell, S. W. (2009) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.17.014567 · Cited by 238 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The STED principle can also be applied to two-photon microscopy (Moneron and Hell, 2009).”
Photoinactivation of native AMPA receptors reveals their real-time trafficking
Adesnik, H., Nicoll, R. A., & England, P. M. (2005) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.11.030 · Cited by 234 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…for synaptic plasticity, although their respective contributions have remained unresolved (Passafaro et al., 2001; Borgdorff and Choquet, 2002; Adesnik et al., 2005; Ashby et al., 2006; Park et al., 2006; Ehlers et al., 2007; Heine et al., 2008; Newpher and Ehlers, 2008; Yang et al., 2008;…”
Photocontrollable Fluorescent Proteins for Superresolution Imaging
Shcherbakova, D. M., Sengupta, P., Lippincott‐Schwartz, J., & Verkhusha, V. V. (2014) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-051013-022836 · Cited by 230 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Novel probes are currently being developed that should allow two-color RESOLFT of dendritic spines (Lavoie-Cardinal et al., 2014; Shcherbakova et al., 2014).”
Fukunaga, K., Muller, D., & Miyamoto, E. (1995) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.270.11.6119 · Cited by 226 · cited 5× · see citing works
“It should be noted that these results based on single spine stimulations contrast earlier biochemical studies that reported persistent phosphorylation of CaMKII upon more global induction of LTP (Fukunaga et al., 1995; Barria et al., 1997; Lisman and Zhabotinsky, 2001).”
InfluentialThe dendritic spine: a multifunctional integrative unit
Shepherd, G. M. (1996) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1996.75.6.2197 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Quantitative fine-structural analysis of olfactory cortical synapses
Schikorski, T., & Stevens, C. F. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.7.4107 · Cited by 204 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Changes in spine size are thought to be generally correlated with changes in the strength of the excitatory synapse (Schikorski and Stevens, 1999; Arellano et al., 2007).”
Activity-dependent dendritic spine neck changes are correlated with synaptic strength
Araya, R., Vogels, T. P., & Yuste, R. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1321869111 · Cited by 197 · cited 5× · see citing works
“…voltage signals from the dendrite propagate without attenuation into the spines (Holthoff et al., 2010; Carter et al., 2012; Popovic et al., 2014), but synaptic potentials generated inside the spine head are filtered when they travel to the dendrite (Araya et al., 2006, 2014; Harnett et al., 2012).”
InfluentialMyosin motors at neuronal synapses: drivers of membrane transport and actin dynamics
Kneussel, M., & Wagner, W. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3445 · Cited by 191 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In addition, the actin cytoskeleton provides tracks for myosin-based transport of various cellular materials in and out of spines, including AMPA-type glutamate receptors (Kneussel and Wagner, 2013).”
A three-step model for the synaptic recruitment of AMPA receptors
Opazo, P., & Choquet, D. (2011) · Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.mcn.2010.08.014 · Cited by 190 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Mushroom shaped spines were found to retain AMPA receptors in the vicinity of the synapse for an increased period of time (Ashby et al., 2006; Ehlers et al., 2007; Opazo and Choquet, 2011, see Figure 3A ).”
InfluentialExcitable dendrites and spines: earlier theoretical insights elucidate recent direct observations
Segev, I., & Rall, W. (1998) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01327-7 · Cited by 181 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In addition to inducing compartmentalization of biochemical signals and receptors, it has been suggested that dendritic spines may also serve as electrical compartments (Segev and Rall, 1998; Yuste, 2013).”
Electrical compartmentalization in dendritic spines
Yuste, R. (2013) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150455 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Ding, J. B., Takasaki, K. T., & Sabatini, B. L. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.07.011 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Super-resolution optical microscopy: multiple choices
Huang, B. (2009) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.10.013 · Cited by 164 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In addition, we review the evidence for specific biochemical compartmentalization of calcium ions and signaling molecules.”
Spine neck plasticity controls postsynaptic calcium signals through electrical compartmentalization
Grunditz, Å., Holbro, N., Tian, L., Zuo, Y., & Oertner, T. G. (2008) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2702-08.2008 · Cited by 157 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Interestingly, induction of plasticity not only results in an increase in spine size (Matsuzaki et al., 2004; Tanaka et al., 2008), but also in changes in spine shape (Grunditz et al., 2008), with consequences for compartmentalization.”
Giessel, A. J., & Sabatini, B. L. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.004 · Cited by 156 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…local depolarization (Araya et al., 2007; Bloodgood et al., 2009; Holbro et al., 2010; Carter et al., 2012; Hao and Oertner, 2012), while opening of potassium channels decreases local input resistance and results in smaller synaptic potentials (Ngo-Anh et al., 2005; Giessel and Sabatini, 2010).”
Ca2+ signaling in dendritic spines
Bloodgood, B. L., & Sabatini, B. L. (2007) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2007.04.003 · Cited by 151 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Inaddition to the exchange of soluble dyes and fluorescent proteins between spines and dendrites, the diffusion of calcium ions has also been studied extensively (Bloodgood and Sabatini, 2007a).”
Yang, Y., Wang, X.-B., Frerking, M. E., & Zhou, Q. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0802978105 · Cited by 149 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…the neck of a typical mushroom-shaped spines follows a power-law dependence on neck radius r , τ escape ∼ ( r neck ) as well as neck length l , where λ and η are positive constants, whose numerical value depends on the actual shape of the spine (Kusters et al., 2013; Kusters and Storm, 2014).”
Control of the postsynaptic membrane viscosity
Renner, M., Choquet, D., & Triller, A. (2009) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4445-08.2009 · Cited by 145 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Based on results from modeling (Renner et al., 2009) it has been suggested that crowding in the spine head may contribute to this phenomenon (Colgan and Yasuda, 2014).”
Live-cell superresolution imaging by pulsed STED two-photon excitation microscopy
Takasaki, K. T., Ding, J. B., & Sabatini, B. L. (2013) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2012.12.053 · Cited by 142 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Several pioneering studies have recently used STED microscopy (Ding et al., 2009; Bethge et al., 2013; Takasaki et al., 2013) to overcome this problem and studied the correlation between spine morphology and diffusional coupling to dendrites by analyzing the recovery of fluorescence after photobleaching of soluble flu…”
InfluentialIzeddin, I., Specht, C. G., Lelek, M., Darzacq, X., Triller, A., Zimmer, C., & Dahan, M. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015611 · Cited by 139 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…membrane-bound proteins (Giannone et al., 2010; Ries et al., 2012), using genetically encoded fluorophores that either directly label or transiently bind to actin (Frost et al., 2010; Izeddin et al., 2011), or using a lipophilic cyanine dye that labels the plasma membrane (Shim et al., 2012).”
Two-photon excitation STED microscopy in two colors in acute brain slices
Bethge, P., Chéreau, R., Avignone, E., Marsicano, G., & Nägerl, U. V. (2013) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2012.12.054 · Cited by 139 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Repeated activation of a photo-activatable variant of GFP (PA-GFP) in individual spines showed substantial variation in the cytoplasmic coupling of individual spines over time that may be regulated by neuronal activity.”
InfluentialRegulation of spine and synapse formation by activity-dependent intracellular signaling pathways
Saneyoshi, T., Fortin, D. A., & Soderling, T. R. (2010) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2009.09.013 · Cited by 133 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Downstream of CaMKII, Ras and Rho GTPases are important for regulating spine morphology (Ramakers, 2002; Saneyoshi et al., 2010) and synaptic strength (Zhu et al.”
Two-Color STED Microscopy of Living Synapses Using A Single Laser-Beam Pair
Tønnesen, J., Nadrigny, F., Willig, K. I., Wedlich‐Söldner, R., & Nägerl, U. V. (2011) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2011.10.011 · Cited by 132 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In addition, we review the evidence for specific biochemical compartmentalization of calcium ions and signaling molecules.”
Nanoscopy of living brain slices with low light levels
Testa, I., Urban, N. T., Jakobs, S., Eggeling, C., Willig, K. I., & Hell, S. W. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.07.028 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Plasticity of dendritic spines: subcompartmentalization of signaling
Colgan, L. A., & Yasuda, R. (2014) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-021113-170400 · Cited by 124 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Based on results from modeling (Renner et al., 2009) it has been suggested that crowding in the spine head may contribute to this phenomenon (Colgan and Yasuda, 2014).”
Biphasic synaptic Ca influx arising from compartmentalized electrical signals in dendritic spines
Bloodgood, B. L., Giessel, A. J., & Sabatini, B. L. (2009) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000190 · Cited by 119 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Such an effect is strengthened by the existence of classes of voltage gated calcium channels that exclusively localize to spines but not dendrites and cooperate with other calcium channels to shape local depolarization and synaptic plasticity (Bloodgood and Sabatini, 2007b; Bloodgood et al., 2009).”
Calcium dynamics of spines depend on their dendritic location
Holthoff, K., Tsay, D., & Yuste, R. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00576-7 · Cited by 117 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…morphology does play a role, as long and thin necks prevent the diffusion of calcium, whereas shorter and thicker necks allow for better diffusional coupling with the dendrite (Majewska et al., 2000; Holthoff et al., 2002; Sabatini et al., 2002; Korkotian et al., 2004; Noguchi et al., 2005).”
AMPA amd NMDA receptors: similarities and differences in their synaptic distribution
Nusser, Z. (2000) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00086-6 · Cited by 108 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Whereas reports based on static EM suggested that glutamate receptors are restricted to synapses (Nusser, 2000), live-cell imaging techniques like FRAP and single molecule tracking changed this view radically (Richards et al., 2004; Triller and Choquet, 2005).”
Gudheti, M. V., Curthoys, N. M., Gould, T. J., Kim, D., Gunewardene, M. S., Gabor, K. A., Gosse, J. A., Kim, C. H., Zimmerberg, J., & Hess, S. T. (2013) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2013.03.054 · Cited by 106 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Lastly, the actin cytoskeleton is known to mediate receptor positioning (Gudheti et al., 2013) and its depolymerization was shown to reduce glutamate receptor accumulations in spines (Allison et al., 2000).”
Mobility in geometrically confined membranes
Domanov, Y. A., Aimon, S., Toombes, G. E. S., Renner, M., Quemeneur, F., Triller, A., Turner, M. S., & Bassereau, P. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1102646108 · Cited by 105 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…on membrane tubes show that reducing the radius of a membrane tube, which sets the relevant length scale in the Saffman-Delbruck theory, indeed reduced the mobility of both lipids and proteins with a factor of five compared to planar diffusion (Daniels and Turner, 2007; Domanov et al., 2011).”
Unified quantitative model of AMPA receptor trafficking at synapses
Czöndör, K., Mondin, M., Garcia, M., Heine, M., Frischknecht, R., Choquet, D., Sibarita, J., & Thoumine, O. R. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1109818109 · Cited by 105 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Mushroom shaped spines were found to retain AMPA receptors in the vicinity of the synapse for an increased period of time (Ashby et al., 2006; Ehlers et al., 2007; Opazo and Choquet, 2011, see Figure 3A ).”
On the electrical function of dendritic spines
Tsay, D., & Yuste, R. (2003) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2003.11.008 · Cited by 103 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…literature either discusses theoretical work or indirectly calculated spine neck resistances based on diffusional coupling of cytoplasm (Shepherd, 1996; Svoboda et al., 1996; Tsay and Yuste, 2004) and often relies on static morphology data from EM (Harris and Stevens, 1988; Koch and Zador, 1993).”
Yoshimura, Y., Shinkawa, T., Taoka, M., Kobayashi, K., Isobe, T., & Yamauchi, T. (2002) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1006/bbrc.2001.6320 · Cited by 94 · cited 1× · see citing works
“CaMKII is a calcium-activated kinase involved in structural plasticity by remodeling of the postsynaptic density (Yoshimura et al., 2002), rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton (Okamoto et al., 2007) and maintenance of spine enlargement (Matsuzaki et al., 2004; Lee et al., 2009).”
Transient sodium current at subthreshold voltages: activation by EPSP waveforms
Carter, B. C., Giessel, A. J., Sabatini, B. L., & Bean, B. P. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.033 · Cited by 86 · cited 4× · see citing works
“This means that voltage signals from the dendrite propagate without attenuation into the spines (Holthoff et al., 2010; Carter et al., 2012; Popovic et al., 2014), but synaptic potentials generated inside the spine head are filtered when they travel to the dendrite (Araya et al.”
InfluentialMap of the synapses formed with the dendrites of spiny stellate neurons of cat visual cortex
Anderson, J. C., Douglas, R. J., Martin, K. A. C., & Nelson, J. C. (1994) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.903410104 · Cited by 85 · cited 2× · see citing works
“However, not all neurons have spines (e.g., stellate neurons) and they can receive excitatory input directly on their shafts (Anderson et al., 1994).”
Dynamic regulation of spine–dendrite coupling in cultured hippocampal neurons
Korkotian, E., Holcman, D., & Segal, M. (2004) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03691.x · Cited by 85 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…morphology does play a role, as long and thin necks prevent the diffusion of calcium, whereas shorter and thicker necks allow for better diffusional coupling with the dendrite (Majewska et al., 2000; Holthoff et al., 2002; Sabatini et al., 2002; Korkotian et al., 2004; Noguchi et al., 2005).”
Sodium channels amplify spine potentials
Araya, R., Nikolenko, V., Eisenthal, K. B., & Yuste, R. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0705282104 · Cited by 80 · cited 3× · see citing works
“These active properties of dendritic spines are thought to play an important role in the interactions between multiple synaptic inputs in dendritic computation (Araya et al., 2007; Harnett et al., 2012).”
Nanoscale analysis of structural synaptic plasticity
Bourne, J. N., & Harris, K. M. (2012) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2011.10.019 · Cited by 78 · cited 4× · see citing works
“In addition, different preparation procedures can easily introduce artifacts (Bourne and Harris, 2012) and also the labeling of specific proteins has so far remained challenging and very inefficient.”
InfluentialHolthoff, K., Zecevic, D., & Konnerth, A. (2010) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2009.184960 · Cited by 76 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Endosome-based delivery of receptors into the head of the dendritic spine does come at a cost: to reach the spine head, they have to cross the actin rich neck, which inevitably causes the endosomes to deform.”
Two‐Color RESOLFT Nanoscopy with Green and Red Fluorescent Photochromic Proteins
Lavoie‐Cardinal, F., Jensen, N. A., Westphal, V., Stiel, A. C., Chmyrov, A., Bierwagen, J., Testa, I., Jakobs, S., & Hell, S. W. (2014) · ChemPhysChem · doi:10.1002/cphc.201301016 · Cited by 63 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Novel probes are currently being developed that should allow two-color RESOLFT of dendritic spines (Lavoie-Cardinal et al., 2014; Shcherbakova et al., 2014).”
Controlling actin cytoskeletal organization and dynamics during neuronal morphogenesis
Kessels, M. M., Schwintzer, L., Schlobinski, D., & Qualmann, B. (2011) · European Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejcb.2010.08.011 · Cited by 56 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The rapid polymerization and depolymerization of actin filaments produces protrusive forces that can quickly change neuronal morphology (Kessels et al., 2011).”
Santamaria, F., Gonzalez, J., Augustine, G. J., & Raghavachari, S. (2010) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000780 · Cited by 53 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Additionally, the high density of proteins in the synapse may reduce diffusion rates of all membrane-bound proteins including glutamate receptors due to crowding (Santamaria et al., 2010).”
Kusters, R., Kapitein, L. C., Hoogenraad, C. C., & Storm, C. (2013) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2013.11.016 · Cited by 53 · cited 8× · see citing works
“…of the spine, a decreasing neck radius and increasing neck length effectively increase the confinement of receptors at the synapse, as can be seen in Figure 3B showing the time-evolution of receptor concentration after the release of 1000 receptors at the top of the spine (Kusters et al., 2013).”
InfluentialSelf-citationTakasaki, K., & Sabatini, B. L. (2014) · Frontiers in Neuroanatomy · doi:10.3389/fnana.2014.00029 · Cited by 51 · cited 8× · see citing works
“Most recently, STED microscopy on dendritic spines in organotypic and acute slices suggested that electric compartmentalization is moderate, but not absent, in most spines (Takasaki and Sabatini, 2014; Tønnesen et al., 2014).”
InfluentialDiffusion laws in dendritic spines
Holcman, D., & Schuss, Z. (2011) · The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/2190-8567-1-10 · Cited by 50 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Nevertheless, modeling studies have often emphasized the interesting effects that shape can have on the diffusion of proteins, calcium ions and other signaling molecules (Holcman and Schuss, 2011).”
Richards, D. A., De Paola, V., Caroni, P., Gähwiler, B. H., & McKinney, R. A. (2004) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2004.062091 · Cited by 49 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Whereas reports based on static EM suggested that glutamate receptors are restricted to synapses (Nusser, 2000), live-cell imaging techniques like FRAP and single molecule tracking changed this view radically (Richards et al., 2004; Triller and Choquet, 2005).”
AMPA receptors gate spine Ca <sup>2+</sup> transients and spike-timing-dependent potentiation
Holbro, N., Grunditz, Å., Wiegert, J. S., & Oertner, T. G. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1004562107 · Cited by 45 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Opening of sodium and calcium channels boosts local depolarization (Araya et al., 2007; Bloodgood et al., 2009; Holbro et al., 2010; Carter et al., 2012; Hao and Oertner, 2012), while opening of potassium channels decreases local input resistance and results in smaller synaptic potentials (Ngo-Anh…”
Diffusion on membrane tubes: a highly discriminatory test of the Saffman-Delbruck theory
Daniels, D. R., & Turner, M. S. (2007) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la0635000 · Cited by 41 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…on membrane tubes show that reducing the radius of a membrane tube, which sets the relevant length scale in the Saffman-Delbruck theory, indeed reduced the mobility of both lipids and proteins with a factor of five compared to planar diffusion (Daniels and Turner, 2007; Domanov et al., 2011).”
The impacts of geometry and binding on CaMKII diffusion and retention in dendritic spines
Byrne, M. J., Waxham, M. N., & Kubota, Y. (2011) · Journal of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s10827-010-0293-9 · Cited by 41 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…with the dendrite was significantly slower, in the range of several minutes (Lee et al., 2009), and additional modeling studies have shown that the effective CaMKII diffusion constant depends heavily on binding to synaptic scaffolds and the actin cytoskeleton in spine necks (Byrne et al., 2011).”
Forced transport of deformable containers through narrow constrictions
Kusters, R., van der Heijden, T., Kaoui, B., Harting, J., & Storm, C. (2014) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.90.033006 · Cited by 40 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…this study did not explicitly model the actin meshwork in the neck, nor the potential deformation of the spine neck itself, it suggests that decreasing the size of the neck, in contrast to its effect on passive diffusion, could hamper the active transport of receptors (Kusters et al., 2014b).”
Self-citationPopovic, M. A., Gao, X., Carnevale, N. T., & Zecevic, D. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs320 · Cited by 35 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Endosome-based delivery of receptors into the head of the dendritic spine does come at a cost: to reach the spine head, they have to cross the actin rich neck, which inevitably causes the endosomes to deform.”
Depolarization gates spine calcium transients and spike-timing-dependent potentiation
Jiang, H., & Oertner, T. G. (2011) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2011.10.004 · Cited by 28 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…of sodium and calcium channels boosts local depolarization (Araya et al., 2007; Bloodgood et al., 2009; Holbro et al., 2010; Carter et al., 2012; Hao and Oertner, 2012), while opening of potassium channels decreases local input resistance and results in smaller synaptic potentials (Ngo-Anh et…”
Optimization of cell morphology measurement via single-molecule tracking PALM
Frost, N. A., Lu, H. E., & Blanpied, T. A. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036751 · Cited by 22 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In all cases, live super-resolution microscopy requires some thoughtful compromises between temporal and spatial resolution (Frost et al., 2012).”
Biophysical mechanisms regulating AMPA receptor accumulation at synapses
Czöndör, K., & Thoumine, O. R. (2012) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2012.11.001 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Superresolving Dendritic Spines
Loew, L. M., & Hell, S. W. (2013) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2013.01.011 · Cited by 15 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, development of three-dimensional depletion patterns and compensation of optical distortions through adaptive optics promise improvements in the near future (Gould et al., 2012; Loew and Hell, 2013).”
Confinement without boundaries: anisotropic diffusion on the surface of a cylinder
Kusters, R., Paquay, S., & Storm, C. (2015) · Soft Matter · doi:10.1039/c4sm02112f · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationImpact of morphology on diffusive dynamics on curved surfaces
Kusters, R., & Storm, C. (2014) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.89.032723 · Cited by 10 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…the neck of a typical mushroom-shaped spines follows a power-law dependence on neck radius r , τ escape ∼ ( r neck ) as well as neck length l , where λ and η are positive constants, whose numerical value depends on the actual shape of the spine (Kusters et al., 2013; Kusters and Storm, 2014).”
Self-citationSheng, M., Malinow, R., & Huganir, R. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/493482a · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 151 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
TAOK2 Kinase Mediates PSD95 Stability and Dendritic Spine Maturation through Septin7 Phosphorylation
Yadav, S., Osés-Prieto, J. A., Peters, C. J., Zhou, J., Pleasure, S. J., Burlingame, A. L., Jan, L. Y., & Jan, Y. N. (2017) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.006 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
“…scaffolding proteins and glutamate receptors into a biochemically insulated compartment, dendritic spines enable precise synaptic transmission with controlled relay to downstream signaling cascades (Adrian et al., 2014; Blanpied and Ehlers, 2004; Chen and Sabatini, 2012; Colgan and Yasuda, 2014).”
Positioning of AMPA Receptor-Containing Endosomes Regulates Synapse Architecture
da Silva, M. E., Adrian, M., Schätzle, P., Lipka, J., Watanabe, T., Cho, S., Futai, K., Wierenga, C. J., Kapitein, L. C., & Hoogenraad, C. C. (2015) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.062 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
“Simulations have suggested that secretion inside spines dramatically increases the fraction of receptors captured at synapses, compared to secretion near the base of the spine neck (Adrian et al., 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationPeriodic F-actin structures shape the neck of dendritic spines
Bär, J., Kobler, O., van Bommel, B., & Mikhaylova, M. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep37136 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Organization and dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton during dendritic spine morphological remodeling
Chazeau, A., & Giannone, G. (2016) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-016-2214-1 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Bell, M. K., Bartol, T., B, T. J. S. A., & Rangamani, P. (2019) · The Journal of General Physiology · doi:10.1085/jgp.201812261 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Vinuesa, Á., Bentivegna, M., Calfa, G. D., Filipello, F., Pomilio, C. J., Bonaventura, M. M., Lux-Lantos, V. A., Matzkin, M. E., Gregosa, A., Presa, J., et al. (2018) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/s12035-018-1435-8 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Whole Brain Imaging with Serial Two-Photon Tomography
Amato, S., Pan, F., Schwartz, J., & Ragan, T. M. (2016) · Frontiers in Neuroanatomy · doi:10.3389/fnana.2016.00031 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Abdellah, M., Hernando, J., Eilemann, S., Lapere, S., Antille, N., Markram, H., & Schürmann, F. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty231 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Mechanisms of neuronal dysfunction in HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders
Irollo, E., Luchetta, J., Ho, C.-T., Nash, B., & Meucci, O. (2021) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-021-03785-y · Cited by 66 · see citing works
“Therefore, spines are dynamic structures that can change their shape, even throughout adulthood [82].”
BackgroundRole of astrocytes in synapse formation and maturation
Tan, C. X., Burrus, C. J., & Eroğlu, Ç. (2021) · Current topics in developmental biology/Current Topics in Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/bs.ctdb.2020.12.010 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
The ESCRT protein CHMP2B acts as a diffusion barrier on reconstituted membrane necks
Franceschi, N. D., Alqabandi, M., Miguet, N., Caillat, C., Mangenot, S., Weissenhorn, W., & Bassereau, P. M. (2018) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.217968 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
“The narrow spine neck acts as a diffusion barrier for both soluble and transmembrane proteins in order to regulate spine maturation and plasticity by compartmentalizing biochemical signaling (Adrian et al., 2014).”
BackgroundCytoskeletal makeup of the synapse: Shaft versus spine
Bucher, M., Fanutza, T., & Mikhaylova, M. (2019) · Cytoskeleton · doi:10.1002/cm.21583 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“This leads to a significant drop in the electrical resistance of spine necks while the biochemical compartmentalization is largely preserved (Adrian et al., 2014; Tønnesen, Katona, Rozsa, & Nagerl, 2014).”
BackgroundDwyer, C. A., Scudder, S. L., Lin, Y., Dozier, L. E., Phan, D., Allen, N. J., Patrick, G. N., & Esko, J. D. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep46576 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Mechanisms regulating dendritic arbor patterning
Ledda, F., & Paratcha, G. (2017) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-017-2588-8 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“1 3 either by restricting receptor diffusion out of spines and/or maintaining spine-selective storage pools [20].”
BackgroundImage-Based Profiling of Synaptic Connectivity in Primary Neuronal Cell Culture
Verstraelen, P., Dyck, M. V., Verschuuren, M., Kashikar, N. D., Nuydens, R., Timmermans, J., & Vos, W. H. D. (2018) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2018.00389 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Postmortem changes in brain cell structure: a reviewPreprint
Krassner, M. M., Kauffman, J., Sowa, A., Cialowicz, K. I., Walsh, S., Farrell, K. W., Crary, J. F., & McKenzie, A. T. (2023) · Free Neuropathology · doi:10.17879/freeneuropathology-2023-4790 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Geometric principles of second messenger dynamics in dendritic spines
Cugno, A., Bartol, T. M., B, T. J. S. A., Iyengar, R., & Rangamani, P. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-48028-0 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Targeting of NF-κB to Dendritic Spines Is Required for Synaptic Signaling and Spine Development
Dresselhaus, E. C., Boersma, M. C. H., & Meffert, M. K. (2018) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2663-16.2018 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“Biochemical and ionic fluxes between the cytoplasm of spines and neighboring dendritic shafts can be limited in mature spines, many of which have relatively thin necks connected to the parent dendrite (Bourne and Harris, 2008; Adrian et al., 2014).”
BackgroundJung, G., Kim, E., Cicvaric, A., Sase, S., Gröger, M., Höger, H., Sialana, F. J., Berger, J., Monje, F. J., & Lübec, G. (2015) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/jnc.13119 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“According to spine shape and size, their morphologies are classified into three categories which are thin, stubby, and mushroom spines (Adrian et al. 2014).”
BackgroundIrradiation of Neurons with High-Energy Charged Particles: An In Silico Modeling Approach
Alp, M., Parihar, V. K., Limoli, C. L., & Cucinotta, F. A. (2015) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004428 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
“The protruding spines from dendrites establish diffusion limited compartments for ions and cellular proteins [44,45], while dynamic filopodia search for new connections sites to establish synapses [46].”
BackgroundGeometric Control of Frequency Modulation of cAMP Oscillations due to Calcium in Dendritic Spines
Ohadi, D., & Rangamani, P. (2019) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2019.10.004 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“Our model assumes a uniform diffusion coefficient of cAMP, which may not be the case in the crowded environment of the spine head (38,98,99) (see Fig.”
BackgroundMacGillavry, H. D., & Hoogenraad, C. C. (2015) · Experimental Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.02.024 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“…neck, which isolates the spine head from the dendritic shaft, can be up to 1 m m long, but is only (cid:1) 75 – 300 nm in diameter [54], and is generally thought to compartmentalize signaling events within individual spines by restricting diffusion of molecules in and out of the spine head [55].”
Self-citationThe Role of Synaptopodin in Membrane Protein Diffusion in the Dendritic Spine Neck
Wang, L., Dumoulin, A., Renner, M. L., Triller, A., & Specht, C. G. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148310 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“Given the role of the spine neck for the compartmentalisation of spiny synapses [1] we hypothesised that the presence of SP may exert an influence on the diffusion of membrane proteins through the neck.”
BackgroundInfluentialLee, K., Chang, H., Seah, C., & Lee, L. (2019) · Frontiers in Neuroanatomy · doi:10.3389/fnana.2019.00075 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“They are crucial for learning and memory but may be severely damaged under pathological conditions (Arikkath, 2012; Adrian et al., 2014).”
BackgroundSpatial control of membrane traffic in neuronal dendrites
Radler, M. R., Suber, A., & Spiliotis, E. T. (2020) · Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.mcn.2020.103492 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“On the spine membrane, glutamate receptors and post-synaptic scaffold proteins are organized in microdomains, clustering at synaptic contacts (post-synaptic density) and diffusing laterally in the perisynaptic membrane (Adrian et al., 2014; Choquet and Triller, 2013; Hruska et al., 2018; Kim and Sheng, 2009).”
BackgroundKaul, D., Smith, C. C., Stevens, J., Fröhlich, A. S., Binder, E. B., Mechawar, N., Schwab, S. G., & Matosin, N. (2020) · Neurobiology of Stress · doi:10.1016/j.ynstr.2020.100270 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Probing the Interplay between Dendritic Spine Morphology and Membrane-Bound Diffusion
Adrian, M., Kusters, R., Storm, C., Hoogenraad, C. C., & Kapitein, L. C. (2017) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2017.06.048 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“Together, these mechanisms may be important in compartmentalizing glutamate receptors, ion channels, or membrane-bound signaling proteins in spines according to their synaptic strength and activity levels (17).”
Self-citationThe role of molecular diffusion within dendritic spines in synaptic function
Obashi, K., Taraska, J. W., & Okabe, S. (2021) · The Journal of General Physiology · doi:10.1085/jgp.202012814 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Jeanneret, V., & Yepes, M. (2016) · Translational Stroke Research · doi:10.1007/s12975-016-0454-x · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“The precursors of DS during development are thin and elongated structures known as filopodia [8, 9] that retract upon establishing synaptic contacts, adopting the appearance of a mature post-synaptic terminal in which it is possible to recognize a head connected to the dendritic shaft through a 50–400-nm-thin neck [10…”
Dendritic Spines in Learning and Memory: From First Discoveries to Current Insights
Heck, N., & Santos, M. D. (2023) · Advances in neurobiology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-36159-3_7 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Post-Synapses in the Brain: Role of Dendritic and Spine Structures
Meldolesi, J. (2022) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines10081859 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Frias, E. S., Hoseini, M. S., Krukowski, K., Paladini, M., Grue, K. A., Ureta, G., Rienecker, K. D. A., Walter, P., Stryker, M., & Rosi, S. (2022) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1073/pnas.2209427119 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“Spine necks are barriers that filter the electrical component of synaptic signals and amplify spine head depolarization, as well as limit the diffusion of intracellular messengers from the spine head into the dendrite (33, 34).”
BackgroundRajendran, K., Chellappan, D. R., Sankaranarayanan, S., Ramakrishnan, V., & Krishnan, U. M. (2020) · Neurochemistry International · doi:10.1016/j.neuint.2020.104890 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Parkins, E. V., & Groß, C. (2024) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0365-24.2024 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Regulation of dendritic spines in the amygdala following sleep deprivation
Rexrode, L., Tennin, M., Babu, J., Young, C., Bollavarapu, R., Lawson, L. A., Valeri, J., Pantazopoulos, H., & Gisabella, B. (2023) · Frontiers in Sleep · doi:10.3389/frsle.2023.1145203 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Spine neck diameter is reported to be a key indicator of synaptic transmission as narrow neck diameters impede molecular diffusion from the spine head to the dendrite (Noguchi et al., 2005; Adrian et al., 2014, 2017).”
BackgroundEditorial: Dendritic spines: from shape to function†
Heck, N., & Benavides‐Piccione, R. (2015) · Frontiers in Neuroanatomy · doi:10.3389/fnana.2015.00101 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Visualizing traumatic stress-induced structural plasticity in a medial amygdala pathway using mGRASP
Bartsch, C. J., Jacobs, J. T., Mojahed, N., Qasem, E., Smith, M. B., Caldwell, O., Aaflaq, S., & Nordman, J. C. (2023) · Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnmol.2023.1313635 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Gilles, J.-F., Mailly, P., Ferreira, T., Boudier, T., & Heck, N. (2024) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.146327.2 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Gest, A. M. M., Grenier, V., & Miller, E. W. (2024) · Bioelectricity · doi:10.1089/bioe.2023.0027 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“22 We adapted two chemical-genetic voltage sensing systems for use with FLIM and determination of values of membrane potential.”
Herbert, A. G. (2024) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2024.1445540 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Dynamics of Vesicles Driven Into Closed Constrictions by Molecular Motors
Park, Y., & Fai, T. G. (2020) · Bulletin of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1007/s11538-020-00820-0 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Many studies assume constant forces (Adrian et al. 2014; Kusters et al. 2014), but in reality, the forces generated by molecular motors are dependent on quantities such as the cargo velocity.”
BackgroundNanoscale imaging of the functional anatomy of the brain
Arizono, M., Bancelin, S., Bethge, P., Chéreau, R., Idziak, A., Inavalli, V. V. G. K., Pfeiffer, T., Tønnesen, J., & Nägerl, U. V. (2021) · e-Neuroforum · doi:10.1515/nf-2021-0004 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Gilles, J.-F., Mailly, P., Ferreira, T., Boudier, T., & Heck, N. (2024) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.146327.1 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Jones, S. K., Dalvi, M., Rha, J., Kim, S., Morris, K. J., Omotade, O. F., Moberg, K. H., Corbett, A. H., & Myers, K. R. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.10.08.331827 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“These spines function as discrete biochemical signaling centers and are one of the primary sites of information processing in the brain (Adrian et al., 2014; Chen & Sabatini, 2012; Svoboda et al., 1996).”
Ma, R., Kang, M., Kim, G. H., Kang, H., Lee, S., Yang, Y., Lee, H. J., Choi, S., Kim, S., Kim, S., et al. (2025) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003192 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“First, dendritic spines, with their narrow neck structure, play a crucial compartmen-talizing role in limiting the propagation of biochemical and electrical signals from synapses [38].”
Banerjee, A., Borgmann‐Winter, K. E., Ray, R., & Hahn, C.-G. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-801829-3.00016-1 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Escribano-Cadena, Y., Tendilla‐Beltrán, H., & Flores, G. (2025) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.07.041 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“…(LTP) promotes mature, mushroom-type spines, while long-term depression (LTD) leads to their loss and an increase in other types such as stubby (Gipson and Olive, 2017), which are involved in Ca 2 + signaling, which have cellular relevance beyond synaptic plasticity (Adrian et al., 2014).”
In vitro reconstitution demonstrates the amyloid-beta mediated myelin membrane deformationPreprint
Tiwari, A., Pradhan, S., Sannigrahi, A., Jha, S., Chattopadhyay, K., Biswas, M., & Saleem, M. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.08.13.456302 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Aggregation of Aβ-40 on the membrane surface might result in the creation of diffusion barriers that would reduce lipid diffusion(Adrian et al, 2014; De Franceschi et al, 2019; Shrivastava et al., 2017).”
BackgroundQuach, T., & Duchemin, A. (2025) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106212 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Calcium dynamics in small spaces: Lessons learned from modeling in dendritic spines
McCabe, K. J., Mesa, M. H., & Rangamani, P. (2025) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2025.09.038 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Small subcellular structures such as the dendritic spine could not historically be resolved morphologically by conventional light microscopy techniques because spine features are smaller than the diffraction limit (35).”
Trafficking proteins show limited differences in mobility across different postsynaptic spines
Mougios, N., Opazo, F., Rizzoli, S. O., & Reshetniak, S. (2023) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2023.105971 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Coarse-Grained Stochastic Model of Myosin-Driven Vesicles into Dendritic Spines
Park, Y., Singh, P., & Fai, T. G. (2022) · SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1137/21m1434180 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Several important questions remain open regarding the function of dendritic spine morphology and its homeostasis, including mechanisms of receptor transport to the postsynapse [2], determinants”
BackgroundGerrow, K., & Brown, C. E. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-803784-3.00003-2
Ma, R., Kang, M., Kim, G. H., Kang, H., Lee, S., Yang, Y., Lee, H. J., Choi, S., Kim, S., Kim, S., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.05.06.652352
WITHDRAWNPreprint
(2025) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/jy3st_v2
WITHDRAWNPreprint
(2025) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/jy3st_v4
WITHDRAWNPreprint
(2025) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/jy3st_v5
WITHDRAWNPreprint
(2025) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/jy3st_v7
Ma, R., Kim, U. S., Chung, Y., & Han, K. (2026) · Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsyn.2026.1963161
- Authors
- Adrian, M., Kusters, R., Wierenga, C. J., Storm, C., Hoogenraad, C. C., & Kapitein, L. C.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Kapitein, Lukas C.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2014-12-04
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 142-142
- ISSN
- 1662-5129 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4255500
- OpenAlex
- W2167869362
- Semantic Scholar
- c7febc7200da9f199450667a9d28386692220dc2
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 151
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 2.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Neuroanatomy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- dendritic spines, dendritic spine morphology, excitatory synapses, synaptic plasticity, cell surface receptors, biochemical signaling, synapse maintenance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-12.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-12.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review