Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Reconstitution of the rat olfactory epithelium after methyl bromide‐induced lesion

Schwob, James E., Youngentob, Steven L., Mezza, Renee C.·1995·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

The olfactory epithelium and its neuronal population are known to have a substantial capacity to recover after either direct injury or damage to the olfactory nerve. However, the mechanisms underlying that capacity for recovery, and indeed the limits on the recovery process, are not well understood. The aim of this study is to describe in detail the way in which the olfactory epithelium reconstitutes after direct injury. Adult male rats were exposed to 330 ppm methyl bromide (MeBr) gas for a single 6—hour period. The exposure destroys all of the neurons and sustentacular cells in over 95% of the olfactory epithelium of food‐restricted rats and in over 90% of the epithelium in ad‐libitum‐fed rats of the same weight, yet substantial recovery of the olfactory epithelium occurs. In response to the lesion, cellular proliferation increases markedly beginning between 24 and 48 hours, peaks at 1 week, and persists at levels higher than the control level for more than 4 weeks after MeBr exposure. Even though proliferation accelerates promptly, the beginning of neuronal reconstitution is delayed; only few immature neurons are observed 3 days after the lesion, yet they reappear in large numbers by the end of the first week. The first mature neurons emerge between 7 and 14 days after lesion and increase to near normal numbers by 4–6 weeks. In association with the restoration of neuronal population, basal cell proliferation returns to control levels between 4 and 6 weeks after damage. Likewise, sustentacular cells, identifiable by anticytokeratin 18 labeling, reappear rapidly and reform a distinct lamina in the superficial aspect of the epithelium. They closely resemble their counterparts in control epithelium with regard to disposition and shape by 3 weeks after lesion and with regard to expression of olfactory‐specific cytochrome P450s by 8 weeks. Thus, most areas of the epithelium are restored to a near normal appearance and cellular composition by the end of 8 weeks, suggesting that the MeBr paradigm for lesioning epithelium offers significant advantages over techniques such as Triton X‐100 or ZnSO 4 irrigation. However, not all measures of epithelial status are normal even at 8 weeks. Immature neurons remain slightly more numerous than normal at this time. Furthermore, some areas of the olfactory epithelium do not recover after MeBr lesion and are replaced by respiratory epithelium. By documenting the events and the extent of olfactory epithelial reconstitution after direct injury, the present results serve as a foundation for future studies designed to identify the mechanisms underlying epithelial recovery and the difference between areas of epithelium that reconstitute fully after lesion and those where the recovery process fails. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.903590103

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 267

Metadata

Authors
Schwob, J. E., Youngentob, S. L., & Mezza, R. C.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-08-14
Volume
359
Issue
1
Pages
15-37
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2061051147
Cited by
267
References
0
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reconstitution of the rat olfactory epithelium after methyl bromide‐induced lesion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.903590103
The paper
Schwob, J. E., Youngentob, S. L., & Mezza, R. C. (1995). Reconstitution of the rat olfactory epithelium after methyl bromide‐induced lesion. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903590103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.