Cited by 345Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesLong-Term Effects of COVID-19SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research

Anosmia in COVID-19: Underlying Mechanisms and Assessment of an Olfactory Route to Brain Infection

Open access
Butowt, Rafal, von Bartheld, Christopher S.·2021·The Neuroscientist

Abstract

In recent months it has emerged that the novel coronavirus—responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic—causes reduction of smell and taste in a large fraction of patients. The chemosensory deficits are often the earliest, and sometimes the only signs in otherwise asymptomatic carriers of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The reasons for the surprisingly early and specific chemosensory dysfunction in COVID-19 are now beginning to be elucidated. In this hypothesis review, we discuss implications of the recent finding that the prevalence of smell and taste dysfunction in COVID-19 patients differs between populations, possibly because of differences in the spike protein of different virus strains or because of differences in the host proteins that enable virus entry, thus modifying infectivity. We review recent progress in defining underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms of the virus-induced anosmia, with a focus on the emerging crucial role of sustentacular cells in the olfactory epithelium. We critically examine the current evidence whether and how the SARS-CoV-2 virus can follow a route from the olfactory epithelium in the nose to the brain to achieve brain infection, and we discuss the prospects for using the smell and taste dysfunctions seen in COVID-19 as an early and rapid diagnostic screening tool.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1073858420956905

Cites

151 of 152 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chemosensory deficits in COVID-19 are often short-lived, with most symptoms resolving in 7-10 days, and sense of smell often returning slightly earlier than taste.

    “Such chemosensory deficits experienced in COVID‐19 are often short‐lived, with most symptoms resolving in 7‐10 days, with sense of smell often returning slightly earlier than taste.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Dos Santos NPC, Khayat AS, Rodrigues JCG, Pinto P, de Araujo GS, Pastana LF, and others. 2020. TMPRSS2 variants and their susceptibility to COVID-19: focus in East Asian and European populations. MedRxiv Preprint. 10.1101/2020.06.09.20126680 [DOI] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  2. Nampoothiri S, Sauve S, Ternier G, Fernandois D, Coelho C, Imbernon M, and others. 2020. The hypothalamus as a hub for putative SARS-CoV-2 brain infection. bioRxiv preprint. doi: 10.1101/2020.06.08.139329 [DOI] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  3. Sato T, Ueha R, Goto T, Yamauchi A, Kondo K, Yamasoba T. 2020. Expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 proteins in the upper and lower aerodigestive tracts of rats. Preprint bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2020.05.14.097204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  4. Walsh-Messinger J, Sahar K, Manis H, Kaye R, Cecchi G, Meyer P, and others. 2020. Standardized testing demonstrates altered odor detection sensitivity and hedonics in asymptomatic college students as SARS-CoV-2 emerged locally. Preprint medRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2020.06.17.20106302 [DOI] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Butowt, R., & von Bartheld, C. S.
Affiliations
  • Department of Molecular Cell Genetics, L. Rydygier Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland
  • Center of Biomedical Research Excellence in Cell Biology, Reno School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA
Venue
The Neuroscientist
Published
2020-09-11
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
582-603
ISSN
  • 1073-8584 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4098
OpenAlex
W3084613638
Cited by
345
References
143
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 97 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 8 · 2018: 2
FWCI
23.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Neuroscientist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • national institutes of health (GM103554)
  • Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika w Toruniu (Excellence Initiative -Research University ID-UB)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Keywords
anosmia, COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, olfactory dysfunction, taste disorders, olfactory epithelium, sustentacular cells, asymptomatic carriers
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Anosmia, Animals, Brain, Humans, Nasal Mucosa, Smell, Olfactory Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review