Cited by 21Color Science and ApplicationsColor perception and designVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Variability in estimation of suprathreshold small color differences

Kuehni, Rolf G.·2009·Color Research & Application

Abstract

Intraobserver and interobserver variability in perceptual small color difference evaluation are known but are rarely analyzed phenomena. They raise the question if humans are equipped to make reliable and uniform estimates of this kind. Data from two recent well‐controlled studies show that intraobserver and, particularly, interobserver variability are surprisingly large. The use of a gray reference scale in place of a single gray reference pair has a small normative effect on the estimate. A large interobserver variability in the estimated magnitude of chromatic differences compared with achromatic reference pairs remains, with an average ratio between largest and smallest estimate of over 3:1 and ratios for individual observers and sample pairs ranging up to 28:1. No correlation was found between the reliability of judgment and the judged magnitude of difference: highly reliable observer groups are not more consistent. Relative reliability of estimate was found inversely related to magnitude of perceived difference. Consequences of these results for the development of improved color difference formulas are discussed. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Col Res Appl, 34, 367–374, 2009

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/col.20522

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lee SG, Assessment of color difference formulae using a comprehensive visual data set around one CIE blue color center, Color Res Appl

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Kuehni, R. G.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina System (US)
Corresponding author
Kuehni, Rolf G.
Venue
Color Research & Application
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-08-05
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
367-374
ISSN
  • 0361-2317 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6378
OpenAlex
W1979336836
Cited by
21
References
7
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Color Research & Application (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Color Science and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Color perception and design
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
color difference perception, interobserver variability, intraobserver variability, observer reliability, color difference formula

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review