Variability in estimation of suprathreshold small color differences
Abstract
Intraobserver and interobserver variability in perceptual small color difference evaluation are known but are rarely analyzed phenomena. They raise the question if humans are equipped to make reliable and uniform estimates of this kind. Data from two recent well‐controlled studies show that intraobserver and, particularly, interobserver variability are surprisingly large. The use of a gray reference scale in place of a single gray reference pair has a small normative effect on the estimate. A large interobserver variability in the estimated magnitude of chromatic differences compared with achromatic reference pairs remains, with an average ratio between largest and smallest estimate of over 3:1 and ratios for individual observers and sample pairs ranging up to 28:1. No correlation was found between the reliability of judgment and the judged magnitude of difference: highly reliable observer groups are not more consistent. Relative reliability of estimate was found inversely related to magnitude of perceived difference. Consequences of these results for the development of improved color difference formulas are discussed. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Col Res Appl, 34, 367–374, 2009
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Gilchrist, A. (2006) · Scientific American Mind · doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0606-42 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Hypnotic suggestion reduces conflict in the human brain
Raz, A., Fan, J., & Posner, M. I. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0503064102 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Gilchrist, A. (2006) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195187168.001.0001 · Cited by 162
Wyszecki, G., & Fielder, G. H. (1971) · Journal of the Optical Society of America · doi:10.1364/josa.61.001501 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Witt, K. (1987) · Color Research & Application · doi:10.1002/col.5080120306 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Mangine, H. N. (2005) · OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network) · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Cárdenas, L. M., Hinks, D., Shamey, R., et al. (2006) · Conference on Colour in Graphics Imaging and Vision · doi:10.2352/cgiv.2006.3.1.art00070 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Lee SG, Assessment of color difference formulae using a comprehensive visual data set around one CIE blue color center, Color Res Appl
Cited by
Still being checked.
- Authors
- Kuehni, R. G.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina System (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kuehni, Rolf G.
- Venue
- Color Research & Application
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-08-05
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 367-374
- ISSN
- 0361-2317 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6378
- OpenAlex
- W1979336836
- Semantic Scholar
- 36e36e8fe7517a6ba44e2e7b0ffddd495df3f9b2
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Color Research & Application (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Color Science and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Color perception and design
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- color difference perception, interobserver variability, intraobserver variability, observer reliability, color difference formula
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review