The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Colorimetric and photometric properties of a 2° fundamental observer
Abstract
The availability of tables with standardized data on the properties of a normal visual visual observer has been a great help in scientific communication. For daily practice these data, going back to the 1920s, still suffice. For basic science they show shortocmings, however. The present paper gives new and extended tables which are intended to be complementary to, rather than to compete with, the old CIE tables.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Spectral sensitivity of human cone photoreceptors
Schnapf, J. L., Kraft, T. W., & Baylor, D. A. (1987) · Nature · doi:10.1038/325439a0 · Cited by 342
Fabrication of Transmission Color Filters Using Silicon Subwavelength Gratings on Quartz Substrates
Kanamori, Y., Shimono, M., & Hane, K. (2006) · IEEE Photonics Technology Letters · doi:10.1109/lpt.2006.883208 · Cited by 179
Metadata
- Authors
- Vos, J. J.
- Venue
- Color Research & Application
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1978-09
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 125-128
- ISSN
- 0361-2317 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6378
- OpenAlex
- W2119907838
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Colorimetric and photometric properties of a 2° fundamental observer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/col.5080030309
- The paper
- Vos, J. J. (1978). Colorimetric and photometric properties of a 2° fundamental observer. Color Research & Application. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.5080030309
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
