The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Iteratively reweighted least squares minimization for sparse recovery
Open accessAbstract
Under certain conditions (known as the restricted isometry property, or RIP) on the m×N matrix Φ (where m<N), vectors x∈ ℝNthat are sparse (i.e., have most of their entries equal to 0) can be recovered exactly from y:= Φ x even though Φ−1(y) is typically an (N−m)—dimensional hyperplane; in addition,x is then equal to the element in Φ−1(y) of minimal 𝓁 1‐norm. This minimal element can be identified via linear programming algorithms. We study an alternative method of determining x, as the limit of an iteratively reweighted least squares(IRLS) algorithm. The main step of this IRLS finds, for a given weight vector w, the element in Φ−1(y) with smallest 𝓁 2(w)‐norm. If x(n)is the solution at iteration step n, then the new weight w(n)is defined by w:= [|x|2+ ε]−1/2,i= 1, …,N, for a decreasing sequence of adaptively defined εn; this updated weight is then used to obtain x(n+ 1)and the process is repeated. We prove that when Φ satisfies the RIP conditions, the sequence x(n)converges for all y, regardless of whether Φ−1(y) contains a sparse vector. If there is a sparse vector in Φ−1(y), then the limit is this sparse vector, and when x(n)is sufficiently close to the limit, the remaining steps of the algorithm converge exponentially fast (linear convergence in the terminology of numerical optimization). The same algorithm with the “heavier” weight w= [|x|2+ ε]−1+τ/2,i= 1, …,N, where 0 < τ < 1, can recover sparse solutions as well; more importantly, we show its local convergence is superlinear and approaches a quadratic rate for τ approaching 0. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Exact Reconstruction of Sparse Signals via Nonconvex Minimization
Chartrand, R. (2007) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/lsp.2007.898300 · Cited by 1,277
Cited by
Majorization-Minimization Algorithms in Signal Processing, Communications, and Machine Learning
Sun, Y., Babu, P., & Palomar, D. P. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2016.2601299 · Cited by 1,820
Beyond Nyquist: Efficient Sampling of Sparse Bandlimited Signals
Tropp, J. A., Laska, J. N., Duarte, M. F., Romberg, J. K., & Baraniuk, R. G. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2009.2034811 · Cited by 1,089
Robust guided image filtering using Nonconvex potentials
Ham, B., Cho, M., & Ponce, J. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2017.2669034 · Cited by 219
Simultaneous Multiple Rotation Averaging Using Lagrangian Duality
Fredriksson, J., & Olsson, C. (2013) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37431-9_19 · Cited by 77
St-Jean, S., Coupé, P., & Descoteaux, M. (2016) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.02.010 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Daubechies, I., DeVore, R., Fornasier, M., & Güntürk, C. S.
- Venue
- Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-10-19
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-38
- ISSN
- 0010-3640 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0312
- OpenAlex
- W2119883478
- Cited by
- 1,295
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 47.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Iteratively reweighted least squares minimization for sparse recovery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cpa.20303
- The paper
- Daubechies, I., DeVore, R., Fornasier, M., & Güntürk, C. S. (2010). Iteratively reweighted least squares minimization for sparse recovery. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.20303
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.