Cited by 219Image and Signal Denoising MethodsImage Enhancement TechniquesAdvanced Image Processing Techniques

Robust guided image filtering using Nonconvex potentials

Open access
Ham, Bumsub, Cho, Minsu, Ponce, Jean·2018·IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

Abstract

Filtering images using a guidance signal, a process called guided or joint image filtering, has been used in various tasks in computer vision and computational photography, particularly for noise reduction and joint upsampling. This uses an additional guidance signal as a structure prior, and transfers the structure of the guidance signal to an input image, restoring noisy or altered image structure. The main drawbacks of such a data-dependent framework are that it does not consider structural differences between guidance and input images, and that it is not robust to outliers. We propose a novel SD (for static/dynamic) filter to address these problems in a unified framework, and jointly leverage structural information from guidance and input images. Guided image filtering is formulated as a nonconvex optimization problem, which is solved by the majorize-minimization algorithm. The proposed algorithm converges quickly while guaranteeing a local minimum. The SD filter effectively controls the underlying image structure at different scales, and can handle a variety of types of data from different sensors. It is robust to outliers and other artifacts such as gradient reversal and global intensity shift, and has good edge-preserving smoothing properties. We demonstrate the flexibility and effectiveness of the proposed SD filter in a variety of applications, including depth upsampling, scale-space filtering, texture removal, flash/non-flash denoising, and RGB/NIR denoising.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpami.2017.2669034

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ham, B., Cho, M., & Ponce, J.
Affiliations
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • Pohang University of Science and Technology (KR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Published
2018-01-01
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
192-207
ISSN
  • 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-9292
OpenAlex
W2291143146
Cited by
219
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 5
FWCI
9.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Open Access System for Information Sharing (Pohang University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Institute for Information & communications Technology Promotion (IITP)
  • Korea government (MSIP) (2016-0- 00197)
  • Development of the high-precision natural 3D view generation technology using smart-car multi sensors and deep learning
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Enhancement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
Keywords
guided filter, non-convex optimization, outlier robustness, image denoising, scale-space filtering, texture removal, edge-preserving smoothing, structure prior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review