The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Performance of dynamic load balancing algorithms for unstructured mesh calculations
Abstract
If a finite element mesh has a sufficiently regular structure, it is easy to decide in advance how to distribute the mesh among the processors of a distributed‐memory parallel processor, but if the mesh is unstructured the problem becomes much more difficult. The distribution should be made so that each processor has approximately equal work to do, and such that communication overhead is minimized. If the mesh is solution‐adaptive, i.e. the mesh and hence the load‐balancing problem change discretely during execution of the code, then it is most efficient to decide the optimal mesh distribution in parallel. In this paper three parallel algorithms, orthogonal recursive bisection (ORB), eigenvector recursive bisection (ERB) and a simple parallelization of simulated annealing (SA) have been implemented for load balancing a dynamic unstructured triangular mesh on 16 processors of an NCUBE machine. The test problem is a solution‐adaptive Laplace solver, with an initial mesh of 280 elements, refined in seven stages to 5772 elements. We present execution times for the solver resulting from the mesh distributions using the three algorithms, as well as results on imbalance, communication traffic and element migration. The load‐balancing itself is fastest with ORB, but a very long run of SA produces a saving of 21% in the execution time of the Laplace solver. ERB is only a little slower than ORB, and yet produces a mesh distribution whose execution time is 15% faster than ORB.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505
Wu, F. Y. (1982) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.54.235 · Cited by 3,570
Cited by
A multilevel algorithm for partitioning graphs
Hendrickson, B., & Leland, R. (1995) · Proceedings of the 1995 ACM/IEEE conference on Supercomputing (CDROM) - Supercomputing '95 · doi:10.1145/224170.224228 · Cited by 1,069
Barnard, S. T., & Simon, H. D. (1994) · Concurrency: Practice and Experience · doi:10.1002/cpe.4330060203 · Cited by 488
Some applications of Laplace eigenvalues of graphs
Mohar, B. (1997) · Graph Symmetry · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-8937-6_6 · Cited by 422
Spectral partitioning works: planar graphs and finite element meshes
Spielman, D. A., & Teng, S.-H. (1996) · Proceedings of 37th Conference on Foundations of Computer Science · doi:10.1109/sfcs.1996.548468 · Cited by 393
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, R. D.
- Venue
- Concurrency: Practice and Experience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-10
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 457-481
- ISSN
- 1040-3108 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9128
- OpenAlex
- W2096159022
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 28.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance of dynamic load balancing algorithms for unstructured mesh calculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cpe.4330030502
- The paper
- Williams, R. D. (1991). Performance of dynamic load balancing algorithms for unstructured mesh calculations. Concurrency: Practice and Experience. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.4330030502
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.