Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 204

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Overcharging in Colloids: Beyond the Poisson–Boltzmann Approach

Quesada‐Pérez, Manuel, González‐Tovar, Enrique, Martín‐Molina, Alberto, Lozada‐Cassou, Marcelo, Hidalgo‐Álvarez, Roque·2003·ChemPhysChem

Abstract

A broad range of manufactured products and biological fluids are colloids. The ability to understand and control the processes (of scientific, technological and industrial interest) in which such colloids are involved relies upon a precise knowledge of the electrical double layer. The traditional approach to describing this ion cloud around colloidal particles has been the Gouy–Chapman model, developed on the basis of the Poisson–Boltzmann equation. Since the early 1980s, however, more sophisticated theoretical treatments have revealed both quantitative and qualitative deficiencies in the Poisson–Boltzmann theory, particularly at high ionic strengths and/or high surface charge densities. This review deals with these novel approaches, which are mostly computer simulations and approximate integral equation theories based on the so‐called primitive model. Special attention is paid to phenomena that cannot be accounted for by the classic theory as a result of neglecting ion size correlations, such as overcharging, namely, the counterion concentration in the immediate neighborhood of the surface is so large that the particle surface is overcompensated. Other illustrative examples are the nonmonotonic behavior of the electrostatic potential and attractive interactions between equally charged surfaces. These predictions are certainly remarkable and, on paper, they can have an effect on experimentally measurable quantities (for instance, electrophoretic mobility). Even so, these new approaches have scarcely been applied in practice. Thus a critical survey on the relevance of ion size correlation in real systems is also included. Overcharging of macroions can also be brought about by adsorption of oppositely charged polyelectrolytes. Noteworthy examples and theoretical approaches for them are also briefly reviewed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cphc.200390040

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 204

Metadata

Authors
Quesada‐Pérez, M., González‐Tovar, E., Martín‐Molina, A., Lozada‐Cassou, M., & Hidalgo‐Álvarez, R.
Venue
ChemPhysChem
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-03-11
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
234-248
ISSN
  • 1439-4235 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-7641
OpenAlex
W1972505880
Cited by
204
References
1
FWCI
7.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overcharging in Colloids: Beyond the Poisson–Boltzmann Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cphc.200390040
The paper
Quesada‐Pérez, M., González‐Tovar, E., Martín‐Molina, A., Lozada‐Cassou, M., & Hidalgo‐Álvarez, R. (2003). Overcharging in Colloids: Beyond the Poisson–Boltzmann Approach. ChemPhysChem. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.200390040

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.