Cited by 659Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryAdvanced Drug Delivery SystemsLipid Membrane Structure and Behavior

Liposome application: problems and prospects.

Barenholz, Yechezkel·2001·Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1359-0294(00)00090-x

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barenholz, Y.
Affiliations
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Barenholz, Yechezkel
Venue
Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-02
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
66-77
ISSN
1359-0294 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980422006
Cited by
659
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 32
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
Israel Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
Keywords
liposomes, steric stabilization, lipoplexes, cationic liposomes, controlled drug release, drug loading, blood-brain barrier, skin permeation, active targeting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review