The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Halogen Bonding: An Interim Discussion
Abstract
Halogen bonding is a noncovalent interaction that is receiving rapidly increasing attention because of its significance in biological systems and its importance in the design of new materials in a variety of areas, for example, electronics, nonlinear optical activity, and pharmaceuticals. The interactions can be understood in terms of electrostatics/polarization and dispersion; they involve a region of positive electrostatic potential on a covalently bonded halogen and a negative site, such as the lone pair of a Lewis base. The positive potential, labeled a σ hole, is on the extension of the covalent bond to the halogen, which accounts for the characteristic near‐linearity of halogen bonding. In many instances, the lateral sides of the halogen have negative electrostatic potentials, allowing it to also interact favorably with positive sites. In this discussion, after looking at some of the experimental observations of halogen bonding, we address the origins of σ holes, the factors that govern the magnitudes of their electrostatic potentials, and the properties of the resulting complexes with negative sites. The relationship of halogen and hydrogen bonding is examined. We also point out that σ‐hole interactions are not limited to halogens, but can also involve covalently bonded atoms of Groups IV–VI. Examples of applications in biological/medicinal chemistry and in crystal engineering are mentioned, taking note that halogen bonding can be “tuned” to fit various requirements, that is, strength of interaction, steric factors, and so forth.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Promotion of microtubule assembly in vitro by taxol
SCHIFF, P. B., FANT, J., & HORWITZ, S. B. (1979) · Nature · doi:10.1038/277665a0 · Cited by 3,600
Activating efficient phosphorescence from purely organic materials by crystal design
Bolton, O., Lee, K., Kim, H.-J., Lin, K. Y., & Kim, J. (2011) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.984 · Cited by 1,662
Cited by
The Bright Future of Unconventional σ/π‐Hole Interactions
Bauzá, A., Mooibroek, T. J., & Frontera, A. (2015) · ChemPhysChem · doi:10.1002/cphc.201500314 · Cited by 710
σ-Hole Bond vs π-Hole Bond: A Comparison Based on Halogen Bond
Wang, H., Wang, W., & Jin, W. J. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00527 · Cited by 631
Halogen Bonds: Benchmarks and Theoretical Analysis
Kozuch, S., & Martin, J. M. L. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct301064t · Cited by 553
Halogen Bond: Its Role beyond Drug–Target Binding Affinity for Drug Discovery and Development
Xu, Z., Yang, Z., Liu, Y., Lu, Y., Chen, K., & Zhu, W. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci400539q · Cited by 431
Metadata
- Authors
- Politzer, P., & Murray, J. S.
- Venue
- ChemPhysChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-01-09
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 278-294
- ISSN
- 1439-4235 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-7641
- OpenAlex
- W2096058748
- Cited by
- 689
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 65.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.