The DOI matches its Crossref record; 136 of the 136 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unraveling the Reaction Mechanisms Governing Methanol‐to‐Olefins Catalysis by Theory and Experiment
Abstract
The conversion of methanol to olefins (MTO) over a heterogeneous nanoporous catalyst material is a highly complex process involving a cascade of elementary reactions. The elucidation of the reaction mechanisms leading to either the desired production of ethene and/or propene or undesired deactivation has challenged researchers for many decades. Clearly, catalyst choice, in particular topology and acidity, as well as the specific process conditions determine the overall MTO activity and selectivity; however, the subtle balances between these factors remain not fully understood. In this review, an overview of proposed reaction mechanisms for the MTO process is given, focusing on the archetypal MTO catalysts, H‐ZSM‐5 and H‐SAPO‐34. The presence of organic species, that is, the so‐called hydrocarbon pool, in the inorganic framework forms the starting point for the majority of the mechanistic routes. The combination of theory and experiment enables a detailed description of reaction mechanisms and corresponding reaction intermediates. The identification of such intermediates occurs by different spectroscopic techniques, for which theory and experiment also complement each other. Depending on the catalyst topology, reaction mechanisms proposed thus far involve aromatic or aliphatic intermediates. Ab initio simulations taking into account the zeolitic environment can nowadays be used to obtain reliable reaction barriers and chemical kinetics of individual reactions. As a result, computational chemistry and by extension computational spectroscopy have matured to the level at which reliable theoretical data can be obtained, supplying information that is very hard to acquire experimentally. Special emphasis is given to theoretical developments that open new perspectives and possibilities that aid to unravel a process as complex as methanol conversion over an acidic porous material.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S., & Krieg, H. (2010) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3382344 · Cited by 59,686
Zhao, Y., & Truhlar, D. G. (2008) · Theoretical Chemistry Accounts · doi:10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x · Cited by 30,302
Long-range corrected hybrid density functionals with damped atom–atom dispersion corrections
Chai, J.-D., & Head-Gordon, M. (2008) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b810189b · Cited by 14,648
Laio, A., & Parrinello, M. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.202427399 · Cited by 5,626
Grimme, S. (2004) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20078 · Cited by 5,221
Inorganic Solid Acids and Their Use in Acid-Catalyzed Hydrocarbon Reactions
Corma, A. (1995) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr00035a006 · Cited by 3,184
Beyond Oil and Gas: The Methanol Economy
Olah, G. A. (2005) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200462121 · Cited by 2,431
Goerigk, L., & Grimme, S. (2011) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c0cp02984j · Cited by 2,004
T RANSITION P ATH S AMPLING : Throwing Ropes Over Rough Mountain Passes, in the Dark
Bolhuis, P. G., Chandler, D., Dellago, C., & Geissler, P. L. (2002) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.53.082301.113146 · Cited by 1,972
Olsbye, U., Svelle, S., Bjørgen, M., Beato, P., Janssens, T. V. W., Joensen, F., Bordiga, S., & Lillerud, K. P. (2012) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201103657 · Cited by 1,802
Cited by
New Stories of Zeolite Structures: Their Descriptions, Determinations, Predictions, and Evaluations
Li, Y., & Yu, J. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500010r · Cited by 603
Advances in theory and their application within the field of zeolite chemistry
Van Speybroeck, V., Hemelsoet, K., Joos, L., Waroquier, M., Bell, R. G., & Catlow, C. R. A. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00029g · Cited by 516
Self-citationZaera, F. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00905 · Cited by 425
Halogen-Mediated Conversion of Hydrocarbons to Commodities
Lin, R., Amrute, A. P., & Pérez-Ramírez, J. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00551 · Cited by 384
Confinement effects and acid strength in zeolites
Grifoni, E., Piccini, G., Lercher, J. A., Glezakou, V.-A., Rousseau, R., & Parrinello, M. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22936-0 · Cited by 203
Metadata
- Authors
- Hemelsoet, K., Van der Mynsbrugge, J., De Wispelaere, K., Waroquier, M., & Van Speybroeck, V.
- Venue
- ChemPhysChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-04-17
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1526-1545
- ISSN
- 1439-4235 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-7641
- OpenAlex
- W2041785117
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 136
- FWCI
- 14.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unraveling the Reaction Mechanisms Governing Methanol‐to‐Olefins Catalysis by Theory and Experiment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cphc.201201023
- The paper
- Hemelsoet, K., Van der Mynsbrugge, J., De Wispelaere, K., Waroquier, M., & Van Speybroeck, V. (2013). Unraveling the Reaction Mechanisms Governing Methanol‐to‐Olefins Catalysis by Theory and Experiment. ChemPhysChem. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201201023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.