Cited by 102Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchResearch Data Management Practices

The AD Knowledge Portal: A Repository for Multi‐Omic Data on Alzheimer's Disease and Aging

Open access
Greenwood, Anna K., Montgomery, Kelsey S., Kauer, Nicole, Woo, Kara H., Leanza, Zoe J., Poehlman, William L., Gockley, Jake, Sieberts, Solveig K. +5 more·2020·Current Protocols in Human Genetics

Abstract

The AD Knowledge Portal (adknowledgeportal.org) is a public data repository that shares data and other resources generated by multiple collaborative research programs focused on aging, dementia, and Alzheimer's disease (AD). In this article, we highlight how to use the Portal to discover and download genomic variant and transcriptomic data from the same individuals. First, we show how to use the web interface to browse and search for data of interest using relevant file annotations. We demonstrate how to learn more about the context surrounding the data, including diagnostic criteria and methodological details about sample preparation and data analysis. We present two primary ways to download data—using a web interface, and using a programmatic method that provides access using the command line. Finally, we show how to merge separate sources of metadata into a comprehensive file that contains factors and covariates necessary in downstream analyses. © 2020 The Authors. Basic Protocol 1: Find and download files associated with a selected study Basic Protocol 2: Download files in bulk using the command line client Basic Protocol 3: Working with file annotations and metadata

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cphg.105

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MR1 gene expression is elevated in brain tissue of AD patients, specifically in the temporal cortex, parahippocampal gyrus, and superior temporal gyrus, normalized to age of death.

    “Having found that MR1 gene expression is elevated in the brain tissue of AD patients by mining the Agora database”

    From Control of the temporal development of Alzheimer’s disease pathology by the MR1/MAIT cell axis (2023) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Introduction describes the AD Knowledge Portal as a repository containing transcriptomic data from human brain samples, but it reports no MR1 expression result. Searches of our copy for MR1, Agora, the named brain regions, and age-of-death normalization found no passage addressing the claimed elevation. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Friend, S., & Norman, T. (2013). Metcalfe's law and the biology information commons. Nature Biotechnology, 31, 297– 303. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2555. 23563423 · DOI
  2. Hodes, R. J., & Buckholtz, N. (2016). Accelerating medicines partnership: Alzheimer's disease (AMP‐AD) knowledge portal aids Alzheimer's drug discovery through open data sharing, Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets, 20, 389– 391. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2016.1135132. 26853544 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greenwood, A. K., Montgomery, K. S., Kauer, N., Woo, K. H., Leanza, Z. J., Poehlman, W. L., Gockley, J., Sieberts, S. K., Bradic, L., Logsdon, B. A., Peters, M. A., Omberg, L., & Mangravite, L. M.
Affiliations
  • Sage Bionetworks (US)
  • Sage Bionetworks Seattle Washington
Corresponding author
Mangravite, Lara M.
Venue
Current Protocols in Human Genetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-10-21
Volume
108
Issue
1
Pages
e105-e105
ISSN
  • 1934-8258 (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-8266
OpenAlex
W3093800747
Cited by
102
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4
FWCI
6.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Protocols in Human Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institute on Aging (U24AG061340, U01AG046139, U01AG046152, U01AG046161, U01AG046170, R01AG046171, R01AG046174, RF1AG051556, RF1AG051633, RF1AG051504, RF1AG051550, R01NS096730, P50AG016574, R37AG027924)
  • Cure Alzheimer's Fund
  • Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, aging, dementia, genomic variant data, transcriptomic data, data download, web interface
MeSH terms
Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Humans, Software, Information Storage and Retrieval, Internet, Genomics, Databases, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review