Cited by 1Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence ApplicationsAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Towards an AI biomedical scientist: Accelerating discoveries in neurodegenerative disease

Open access
Roberts, Kaleigh F., Landsness, Eric C., Reese, Justin, Elbert, Donald, Strobel, Gabrielle, Wu, Elizabeth, Chen, Yixin, Lai, Albert +27 more·2026·The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract

Despite major advances in Alzheimer's disease and related diseases (ADRD) research, the translation of discoveries into impactful clinical interventions remains slow. Overwhelming data complexity, fragmented knowledge, and prolonged research cycles hinder progress in understanding and treating neurodegenerative diseases. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a promising path forward, particularly when developed as a scientist-in-the-loop system that collaborates with researchers throughout the scientific discovery process. This paper introduces the concept of an AI Biomedical Scientist, an intelligent platform designed to support literature synthesis, hypothesis generation, experimental design, and data interpretation. This platform aims to function as a holistic scientific partner, integrating diverse biomedical data and expert reasoning to accelerate discovery. We review commercial and academic efforts and introduce targeted Minimum Viable Products (MVPs) needed for general biomedical research lab utilization of AI, such as robust and accurate tools for literature and data analysis, negative data models, and virtual peer review, with a longer-term vision of foundation models trained directly on biomedical datasets. In AD and neurodegeneration research, such tools are anticipated to deliver efficiency gains ranging from modest improvements in specific research tasks to potential multi-fold accelerations in discovery workflows as systems mature and scale. This review examines the technical foundations, challenges, and anticipated impacts of AI and aims to inform and engage researchers in utilizing these systems to transform biomedical discovery, starting with AD and extending to other complex conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100398

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. [17]Tu T. Fang Z. Cheng Z. Spasic S. Palepu A. Stankovic K.M. Genetic discovery enabled by A large language model [Internet] bioRxiv https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.11.09.566468v1 2023 · DOI
  2. [20]Kwa T. West B. Becker J. Deng A. Garcia K. Hasin M. Measuring AI ability to complete long tasks [Internet] arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.14499 2025 · arXiv
  3. [23]Shah C. From prompt engineering to prompt science with Human in the loop [Internet] arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.04122 2024 · arXiv
  4. [24]Naveed H. Khan A.U. Qiu S. Saqib M. Anwar S. Usman M. A comprehensive overview of large language models [Internet] arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.06435 2024 · arXiv
  5. [25]Pantha N. Ramasubramanian M. Gurung I. Maskey M. Ramachandran R. Challenges in guardrailing large language models for science [Internet] arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.08181 2024 · arXiv
  6. [29]Bolton E. Venigalla A. Yasunaga M. Hall D. Xiong B. Lee T. BioMedLM: a 2.7B parameter language model trained on biomedical text [Internet] arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.18421 2024 · arXiv
  7. [30]Saab K. Tu T. Weng W.H. Tanno R. Stutz D. Wulczyn E. Capabilities of Gemini models in medicine [Internet] arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.18416 2024 · arXiv
  8. [32]Gao Y. Xiong Y. Gao X. Jia K. Pan J. Bi Y. Retrieval-augmented generation for large language models: a survey [Internet] arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.10997 2024 · arXiv
  9. [33]Lewis P. Perez E. Piktus A. Petroni F. Karpukhin V. Goyal N. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2020 Curran Associates Inc. Red Hook, NY, USA 9459 9474 NIPS ’20
  10. [34]Han H. Wang Y. Shomer H. Guo K. Ding J. Lei Y. Retrieval-augmented generation with graphs (GraphRAG) [Internet] arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.00309 2025 · arXiv
  11. [35]Nisa U. Shirazi M. Saip M.A. Pozi M.S.M. Agentic AI: the age of reasoning—A review J Autom Intell [Internet] 2025 Aug 28 [cited 2025 Oct 6]Available from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949855425000516
  12. [41]McMahan B. Moore E. Ramage D. Hampson S. Arcas B.A. Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics [Internet]. PMLR 2017 1273 1282 [cited 2025 Oct 6]Available from https://proceedings.mlr.press/v54/mcmahan17a.html
  13. [44]Zhang F. Kreuter D. Chen Y. Dittmer S. Tull S. Shadbahr T. Recent methodological advances in federated learning for healthcare Patterns [Internet] 5 6 2024 June 14 [cited 2025 Oct 6]Available from https://www.cell.com/patterns/abstract/S2666-3899(24)00131-4 PMC11240178 39005485
  14. [45]Xu T. Feng J. Melendez J. Roberts K. Cai D. Zhu M. Addressing accuracy and hallucination of LLMs in Alzheimer’s disease research through knowledge graphs [Internet] arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.21238 2025 · arXiv
  15. [46]Skarlinski M.D. Cox S. Laurent J.M. Braza J.D. Hinks M. Hammerling M.J. Language agents achieve superhuman synthesis of scientific knowledge [Internet] arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.13740 2024 · arXiv
  16. [47]Pu K. Feng K.J.K. Grossman T. Hope T. Mishra B.D. Latzke M. IdeaSynth: iterative research idea development through evolving and composing idea facets with literature-grounded feedback Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems [Internet] 2025 1 31 [cited 2025 July 18]Available from http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.04025 · arXiv
  17. [48]Lu C. Lu C. Lange R.T. Foerster J. Clune J. Ha D. The AI scientist: towards fully automated open-ended scientific discovery [Internet] arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.06292 2024 · arXiv
  18. [49]Wei J. Yang Y. Zhang X. Chen Y. Zhuang X. Gao Z. From AI for science to agentic science: a survey on autonomous scientific discovery [Internet] arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.14111 2025 · arXiv
  19. [50]Gottweis J. Weng W.H. Daryin A. Tu T. Palepu A. Sirkovic P. Towards an AI co-scientist [Internet] arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.18864 2025 · arXiv
  20. [51]Ghareeb A.E. Chang B. Mitchener L. Yiu A. Szostkiewicz C.J. Laurent J.M. Robin: a multi-agent system for automating scientific discovery [Internet] arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.13400 2025 PMC13346116 42156546 · arXiv
  21. [52]Lahiri A.K. Hu Q.V. AlzheimerRAG: multimodal retrieval augmented generation for clinical use cases using PubMed articles [Internet] arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.16701 2025 · arXiv
  22. [53]Naumov V. Zagirova D. Lin S. Xie Y. Gou W. Urban A. DORA AI scientist: multi-agent virtual research team for scientific exploration discovery and automated report generation [Internet] bioRxiv https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.03.06.641840v1 2025 · DOI
  23. [55]Swanson K. Wu W. Bulaong N.L. Pak J.E. Zou J. The Virtual Lab of AI agents designs new SARS-CoV-2 nanobodies Nature 2025 1 3 July 29 40730228
  24. [57]Istrate A.M. Milletari F. Castrotorres F. Tomczak J.M. Torkar M. Li D. rbio1-training scientific reasoning LLMs with biological world models as soft verifiers [Internet] bioRxiv https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.08.18.670981v2 2025 · DOI
  25. [58]Chai J. Tang S. Ye R. Du Y. Zhu X. Zhou M. SciMaster: towards general-purpose scientific AI agents, part I X-Master Found: Can We Lead Humanity 19s Last Exam? [Internet] 2025 arXiv[cited 2025 Aug 29]Available from http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.05241 · arXiv
  26. [60]Roohani Y. Lee A. Huang Q. Vora J. Steinhart Z. Huang K. BioDiscoveryAgent: an AI agent for designing genetic perturbation experiments [Internet] arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17631 2025 · arXiv
  27. [61]Ding N. Qu S. Xie L. Li Y. Liu Z. Zhang K. Automating exploratory proteomics research via language models [Internet] arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.03743 2024 · arXiv
  28. [62]Jin R. Zhang Z. Wang M. Cong L. STELLA: self-evolving LLM agent for biomedical research [Internet] arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.02004 2025 · arXiv
  29. [77]Saunders S. Gregory S. Clement M.H.S. Birck C. der Geyten S van Ritchie C.W The European Prevention of Alzheimer’s Dementia Programme: an Innovative Medicines Initiative-funded partnership to facilitate secondary prevention of Alzheimer’s disease dementia Front Neurol [Internet] 2022 13 Nov 22 [cited 2025 Aug 29]Available from https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neurology/articles/10.3389/fneur.2022.1051543/full PMC9723139 36484017 · DOI
  30. [83]Cai Y. Zhou J. Scott P.W. Tian Q. Wanigatunga A.A. Lipsitz L. Physical activity complexity, cognition, and risk of cognitive impairment and dementia in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging Alzheimers Dement (N Y) 11 2 2025 e70077 PMC11982518 40225241
  31. [89]Nilforooshan R., Barnaghi P. The RESILIENT dataset: multimodal monitoring of ageing-related comorbidities and cognitive decline [Internet]. Zenodo; 2025 [cited 2025 Aug 29]. Available from: https://zenodo.org/records/16755408. PMC12546717 41125650
  32. [96]Lau O. Golder S. Comparison of elicit AI and traditional literature searching in evidence syntheses using four case studies Cochrane Evid Synth Methods 3 6 2025 e70050 Nov PMC12483133 41035533
  33. [97]Wang Z. Cao L. Jin Q. Chan J. Wan N. Afzali B. A foundation model for human-AI collaboration in medical literature mining [Internet] arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.16255 2025 PMC12460617 40993125 · arXiv
  34. [99]Qi B. Zhang K. Tian K. Li H. Chen Z.R. Zeng S. Large language models as biomedical hypothesis generators: a comprehensive evaluation [Internet] arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.08940 2024 · arXiv
  35. [101]Gabriel I. Manzini A. Keeling G. Hendricks L.A. Rieser V. Iqbal H. The ethics of advanced AI assistants [Internet] arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.16244 2024 · arXiv
  36. [102]Tang X. Jin Q. Zhu K. Yuan T. Zhang Y. Zhou W. Risks of AI scientists: prioritizing safeguarding over autonomy [Internet] arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.04247 2025 PMC12446425 40968279 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roberts, K. F., Landsness, E. C., Reese, J., Elbert, D., Strobel, G., Wu, E., Chen, Y., Lai, A., Abrams, Z. B., Zhu, M., Melendez, J., Koutarapu, S., Song, S., Chen, Y., Lazar, R., Barnaghi, P., Crary, J. F., Sardi, S. P., Voss, M. D., Krishnan, R., Schwartz, J. W., Mallon, R., Jimenez-Maggiora, G. A., Wang, C., Sandmann, T., Bose, N., Phatak, M., Wittenberg, G., Kevrekidis, Y. G., Mitchell, C. S., Mitchener, L., Raj, T., Foschini, L., Moore, G. J., & Bateman, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Alzforum (US)
  • Booz Allen Hamilton (United States) (US)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Sanofi (United States) (US)
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • Denali Therapeutics (United States) (US)
  • Sage Bionetworks (US)
  • Johnson & Johnson (United States) (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • Future House, Inc. (US)
  • Gates Ventures (US)
Corresponding author
Bateman, Randall J.
Venue
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
100398
ISSN
2274-5807 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4416832596
Cited by
1
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1r35gm152245-01)
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG066514, U19AG065169)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35 GM152245)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS133365)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
neurodegenerative diseases, Alzheimer's disease and related dementias, literature synthesis, hypothesis generation, experimental design, data interpretation, foundation models, biomedical data integration, research acceleration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review