The characteristics of obsessional thinking: Difficulty demonstrating the obvious?
Abstract
Clinical observations suggest that attention to detail, indecision, and doubt, are reliably associated with obsessive‐compulsive disorder and obsessional personality disorder. Several experimental investigations have sought to demonstrate the cognitive substrates of these clinical features. Category formation, decision making, and mnestic impairment have been the principal foci of academic interest. A critical review of this literature suggests that results are inconsistent, attributable to mood, or undemonstrated in clinical populations. Further work correcting for previous methodological weaknesses is necessary. Suggestions are made with respect to new areas worthy of investigation. The administration of neuropsychological tests of frontal lobe functioning to obsessional patients is recommended. Further, investigations of ‘epistemological sense’ are recommended. Finally, a new treatment strategy for compulsive checkers—inspired by the mnestic deficit hypothesis—is described. Continued investigation of the cognitive substrates of obsessional illness is considered to be a worthwhile endeavour. Such investigations extend the remit of cognitive clinical psychology, compliment advances in biological psychiatry, and suggest novel treatment interventions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
According to the cognitive model of OCD, emotional processing theory, and Wells' metacognitive model, dysfunctional beliefs play an important role in the development and maintenance of OCD.
“According to the cognitive model of OCD [6–8], emotional processing theory [9], and Wells’ metacognitive model [10–12], dysfunctional beliefs play an important role in the development as well as maintenance of OCD.”
From Metacognitive Training for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (2020) · cites this paper as [8]
The importance of targeting dysfunctional (meta-)cognitive beliefs, biases and dysfunctional coping strategies in the treatment of OCD has already been demonstrated.
“The importance of targeting dysfunctional (meta-)cognitive beliefs, biases as well as dysfunctional coping strategies in the treatment of OCD has already been demonstrated [6–8, 10–12].”
From Metacognitive Training for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (2020) · cites this paper as [8]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 115 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- Tallis, F.
- Affiliations
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Tallis, Frank
- ORCID
- Tallis, Frank
- Venue
- Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-04
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24-39
- ISSN
- 1063-3995 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0879
- OpenAlex
- W2048976938
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 115
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- obsessive-compulsive disorder, indecision, doubt, attention to detail, category formation, decision-making, frontal lobe function, compulsive checking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review