Cited by 115Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

A model-based meta-analysis of 24 antihyperglycemic drugs for type 2 diabetes: comparison of treatment effects at therapeutic doses

Maloney, Alan, Rosenstock, Julio, Fonseca, Vivian·2019·Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Model-based meta-analysis was used to compare glycemic control, weight changes, and hypoglycemia risk across 24 antihyperglycemic drugs used to treat type 2 diabetes. Electronic searches identified 229 randomized controlled studies comprising 121,914 patients. To ensure fair and unbiased treatment comparisons, the analyses adjusted for important differences between studies, including duration of treatment, baseline glycated hemoglobin, and drug dosages. At the approved doses, glycemic control was typically greatest with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), and least with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. Weight loss was highly variable across GLP-1RAs but was similar across sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. Large weight increases were observed with sulfonylureas and thiazolidinediones. Hypoglycemia risk was highest with sulfonylureas, although gliclazide was notably lower. Hypoglycemia risk for DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors, and thiazolidinediones was generally very low but increased slightly for both GLP-1RAs and metformin. In summary, important differences between and within drug classes were identified.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpt.1307

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maloney, A., Rosenstock, J., & Fonseca, V.
Affiliations
  • Equation AB Halmstad Sweden
  • Dallas Diabetes Research Center (US)
  • Tulane University (US)
Corresponding author
Maloney, Alan
Venue
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-01-13
Volume
105
Issue
5
Pages
1213-1223
ISSN
  • 0009-9236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-6535
OpenAlex
W2901511101
Cited by
115
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 7
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, antidiabetic drugs, glycemic control, weight change, hypoglycemia risk, GLP-1 receptor agonists, DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors, sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, metformin, gliclazide, drug class comparison
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review