The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How credible are mining corporations' sustainability reports? a critical analysis of external assurance under the requirements of the international council on mining and metals
Abstract
Member companies of the International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM) have committed to publish externally assured sustainability reports. This paper evaluates the quality of assurance provided to those companies by analyzing the extent to which a sample of their assurance statements met minimum recommended contents. It also seeks to understand the implications of the recently launched ICMM Assurance Procedure. Nine out of the sixteen companies hired assurance in the period analyzed. Their statements mirrored several quality problems highlighted in previous studies. The extensive scope limitations and diversity of verification criteria employed by assurors indicate that mining companies had significant control over the practice. The Assurance Procedure might bring more consistency and breadth to the verification process. The extent to which it will contribute to increased trust in reported information will depend on several factors, including how assurors may interpret the procedure's requirements. Directions for further research are discussed. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.005 · Cited by 1,775
The determinants of business contribution to the 2030 Agenda: Introducing the SDG Reporting Score
Pizzi, S., Rosati, F., & Venturelli, A. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2628 · Cited by 426
Sustainability reporting among mining corporations: a constructive critique of the GRI approach
Fonseca, A., McAllister, M. L., & Fitzpatrick, P. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.050 · Cited by 292
Self-citationdel Mar Alonso‐Almeida, M., Llach, J., & Marimon, F. (2014) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.1318 · Cited by 274
True transparency or mere decoupling? The study of selective disclosure in sustainability reporting
Roszkowska-Menkes, M., Aluchna, M., & Kamiński, B. (2024) · Critical Perspectives on Accounting · doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2023.102700 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Fonseca, A.
- Venue
- Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 355-370
- ISSN
- 1535-3958 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3966
- OpenAlex
- W2027485008
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How credible are mining corporations' sustainability reports? a critical analysis of external assurance under the requirements of the international council on mining and metals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/csr.230
- The paper
- Fonseca, A. (2010). How credible are mining corporations' sustainability reports? a critical analysis of external assurance under the requirements of the international council on mining and metals. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.230
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.