Cited by 292Corporate Social Responsibility ReportingMining and Resource ManagementEnvironmental and Social Impact Assessments

Sustainability reporting among mining corporations: a constructive critique of the GRI approach

Open access
Fonseca, Alberto, McAllister, Mary Louise, Fitzpatrick, Patricia·2014·Journal of Cleaner Production

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.050

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 65 · Cited by 292

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [26]26. Fitzpatrick, P., Fonseca, A., McAllister, M.L., 2011. From the Whitehorse mining initiative towards sustainable mining. Journal of Cleaner Production 19, 376e384.
  2. [48]48. Hart, C., 1998. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Imagination. SAGE Publications, London.
  3. [67]67. Matthews, M., Pearce, R., Chapman, J., 2004. Sustainability Reporting by the Mining Industry: compared with the Requirements of the GRI, Minerals Council of Australia 2004 Inaugural Sustainable Development Conference, Melbourne.
  4. [87]87. Rio Tinto, 2007. Access to Resources, People, Land, Capital: Rio Tinto 2006 Sustainable Development Review. Rio Tinto, London.
  5. [90]90. min. Schertenleib, R., 2000. The Bellagio Principles and a household centered approach in environmental sanitation, Ecological Sanitation Symposium. gtz, pp. 52e58.

Authors
Fonseca, A., McAllister, M. L., & Fitzpatrick, P.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (BR)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • The University of Winnipeg (CA)
Corresponding author
Fonseca, Alberto
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
84
Pages
70-83
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031014310
Cited by
292
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 6
FWCI
32.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion)
  • Repository of Samara University (Samara National Research University) (submittedVersion)
  • ENPUIR (National Pedagogical Dragomanov University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Mining and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
Keywords
sustainability reporting, mining companies, Global Reporting Initiative, GRI framework, scenario development, legacy effects, corporate social responsibility, environmental performance evaluation, standardized reporting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review