The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Communication in corporate environmental reports
Abstract
Since the beginning of the 1990s the number of companies producing environmental reports has increased considerably, a rise that now has reached a plateau. Some critics claim environmental reports are merely an exercise in public relations. This study describes the ascent of and the motives behind corporate environmental reporting and examines the extent to which the messages communicated in environmental reports correlate with the messages contained in corresponding annual reports and actual corporate behaviour. The indicated praxis of steering attention away from environmental problems—a by‐pass solution—can involve providing contradictory information to various stakeholders. This article looks into third‐party verification impacts on the credibility of environmental reports and calls for stricter reporting rules. The paper also discusses how eco‐efficiency and sustainability demands placed on the scope of environmental reporting could enhance the sustainability of this reporting phenomenon, by for example doing away with merely limiting reports to company‐judicial borders. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97 · Cited by 13,365
Cited by
Shared producer and consumer responsibility — Theory and practice
Lenzen, M., Murray, J., Sack, F., & Wiedmann, T. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.05.018 · Cited by 656
Perrini, F., & Tencati, A. (2006) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.538 · Cited by 578
Corporate social responsibility disclosure and market value: Family versus nonfamily firms
Nekhili, M., Nagati, H., Chtioui, T., & Rebolledo, C. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.04.001 · Cited by 377
The Global Reporting Initiative and corporate sustainability reporting in Swedish companies
Hedberg, C., & von Malmborg, F. (2003) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.38 · Cited by 334
Hofer, C., Cantor, D. E., & Dai, J. (2012) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2011.06.002 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Cerin, P.
- Venue
- Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-02-22
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 46-65
- ISSN
- 1535-3958 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3966
- OpenAlex
- W2116447460
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Communication in corporate environmental reports. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/csr.6
- The paper
- Cerin, P. (2002). Communication in corporate environmental reports. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.