The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimization of Hydrothermal Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass in the Bioethanol Production Process
Open accessAbstract
The natural resistance to enzymatic deconstruction exhibited by lignocellulosic materials has designated pretreatment as a key step in the biological conversion of biomass to ethanol. Hydrothermal pretreatment in pure water represents a challenging approach because it is a method with low operational costs and does not involve the use of organic solvents, difficult to handle chemicals, and “external” liquid or solid catalysts. In the present work, a systematic study has been performed to optimize the hydrothermal treatment of lignocellulosic biomass (beech wood) with the aim of maximizing the enzymatic digestibility of cellulose in the treated solids and obtaining a liquid side product that could also be utilized for the production of ethanol or valuable chemicals. Hydrothermal treatment experiments were conducted in a batch‐mode, high‐pressure reactor under autogeneous pressure at varying temperature (130–220 °C) and time (15–180 min) regimes, and at a liquid‐to‐solid ratio (LSR) of 15. The intensification of the process was expressed by the severity factor, log Ro. The major changes induced in the solid biomass were the dissolution/removal of hemicellulose to the process liquid and the partial removal and relocation of lignin on the external surface of biomass particles in the form of recondensed droplets. The above structural changes led to a 2.5‐fold increase in surface area and total pore volume of the pretreated biomass solids. The enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose to glucose increased from less than 7 wt % for the parent biomass to as high as 70 wt % for the treated solids. Maximum xylan recovery (60 wt %) in the hydrothermal process liquid was observed at about 80 wt % hemicellulose removal; this was accomplished by moderate treatment severities (log Ro=3.8–4.1). At higher severities (log Ro=4.7), xylose degradation products, mainly furfural and formic acid, were the predominant chemicals formed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice
Anastas, P. T., & Warner, J. C. (1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 8,599
Bozell, J. J., & Petersen, G. R. (2010) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/b922014c · Cited by 4,566
Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass
Hendriks, A. T. W. M., & Zeeman, G. (2009) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2008.05.027 · Cited by 3,794
Park, S., Baker, J. O., Himmel, M. E., Parilla, P. A., & Johnson, D. K. (2010) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/1754-6834-3-10 · Cited by 3,395
Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition
Palmqvist, E., & Hahn-Hägerdal, B. (2000) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/s0960-8524(99)00161-3 · Cited by 2,521
Liquid‐Phase Catalytic Processing of Biomass‐Derived Oxygenated Hydrocarbons to Fuels and Chemicals
Chheda, J. N., Huber, G. W., & Dumesic, J. A. (2007) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200604274 · Cited by 2,342
Production of liquid biofuels from renewable resources
Nigam, P. S., & Singh, A. (2011) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2010.01.003 · Cited by 2,156
Trends in biotechnological production of fuel ethanol from different feedstocks
Sánchez, Ó. J., & Cardona, C. A. (2008) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.11.013 · Cited by 1,826
Bio-ethanol – the fuel of tomorrow from the residues of today
Hahn-Hägerdal, B., Galbe, M., Gorwa-Grauslund, M. F., Lidén, G., & Zacchi, G. (2006) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.10.004 · Cited by 1,513
An overview of second generation biofuel technologies
Sims, R. E. H., Mabee, W., Saddler, J. N., & Taylor, M. (2010) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.046 · Cited by 1,497
Cited by
Sun, D., Lv, Z.-W., Rao, J., Tian, R., Sun, S.-N., & Peng, F. (2022) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.119050 · Cited by 269
Usman, M., Chen, H., Chen, K., Ren, S., Clark, J. H., Fan, J., Luo, G., & Zhang, S. (2019) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c8gc03957g · Cited by 229
Bioethanol from macroalgae: Prospects and challenges
Ramachandra, T. V., & Hebbale, D. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109479 · Cited by 184
Song, B., Lin, R., Lam, C. H., Wu, H., Tsui, T.-H., & Yu, Y. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110370 · Cited by 186
Hydrothermal liquefaction of lignin to aromatic chemicals: impact of lignin structure
Cao, Y., Zhang, C., Tsang, D. C. W., Fan, J., Clark, J. H., & Zhang, S. (2020) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.0c01617 · Cited by 128
Cao, Y., Chen, S. S., Tsang, D. C. W., Clark, J. H., Budarin, V. L., Hu, C., Wu, K. C.-W., & Zhang, S. (2020) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c9gc03553b · Cited by 76
Masri, M. A., Younes, S., Haack, M., Qoura, F., Mehlmer, N., & Brück, T. (2018) · Energy Technology · doi:10.1002/ente.201700604 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Nitsos, C. K., Matis, K. A., & Triantafyllidis, K. S.
- Venue
- ChemSusChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-11-23
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 110-122
- ISSN
- 1864-5631 (ISSN-L)
- 1864-564X
- OpenAlex
- W2144702632
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 80
- FWCI
- 10.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.