Cited by 109Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFuel Cells and Related MaterialsCatalytic Processes in Materials Science

Mechanisms for Enhanced Performance of Platinum‐Based Electrocatalysts in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells

Su, Liang, Jia, Wenzhao, Li, Chang‐Ming, Lei, Yu·2014·ChemSusChem

Abstract

As a new generation of power sources, fuel cells have shown great promise for application in transportation. However, the expensive catalyst materials, especially the cathode catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), severely limit the widespread commercialization of fuel cells. Therefore, this review article focuses on platinum (Pt)‐based electrocatalysts for ORR with better catalytic performance and lower cost. Major breakthroughs in the improvement of activity and durability of electrocatalysts are discussed. Specifically, on one hand, the enhanced activity of Pt has been achieved through crystallographic control, ligand effect, or geometric effect; on the other hand, improved durability of Pt‐based cathode catalysts has been realized by means of the incorporation of another noble metal or the morphological control of nanostructures. Furthermore, based on these improvement mechanisms, rationally designed Pt‐based nanoparticles are summarized in terms of different synthetic strategies such as wet‐chemical synthesis, Pt‐skin catalysts, electrochemically dealloyed nanomaterials, and Pt‐monolayer deposition. These nanoparticulate electrocatalysts show greatly enhanced catalytic performance towards ORR, aiming not only to outperform the commercial Pt/C, but also to exceed the US Department of Energy 2015 technical target ($30/kW and 5000 h).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cssc.201300823

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Su, L., Jia, W., Li, C., & Lei, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Chang‐Ming
  • Lei, Yu
Venue
ChemSusChem
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-01-21
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
361-378
ISSN
  • 1864-5631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1864-564X
OpenAlex
W2123572612
Cited by
109
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ChemSusChem (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Keywords
platinum electrocatalysts, oxygen reduction reaction, proton exchange membrane fuel cells, cathode catalysts, catalyst stability, crystallographic control, ligand effects, geometry effects, bimetallic catalysts, nanocatalysts, wet chemical synthesis, catalyst cost reduction
MeSH terms
Catalysis, Electrochemistry, Membranes, Artificial, Platinum, Electric Power Supplies, Protons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review