The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polar Group and Defect Engineering in a Metal–Organic Framework: Synergistic Promotion of Carbon Dioxide Sorption and Conversion
Abstract
A sulfone‐functionalized metal–organic framework (MOF), USTC‐253, has been synthesized that exhibits a much higher CO 2 uptake capacity (168–182 %) than the corresponding unfurnished MOFs. The introduction of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) during the synthesis of USTC‐253 affords defect‐containing USTC‐253‐TFA with exposed metal centers, which has an increased CO 2 uptake (167 %) compared to pristine USTC‐253. USTC‐253‐TFA exhibits a very high ideal adsorption solution theory selectivity (S=75) to CO 2 over N 2 at 298 K. In addition, USTC‐253‐TFA demonstrates good catalytic activity and recyclability in the cycloaddition of CO 2 and epoxide at room temperature under 1 bar CO 2 pressure as a result of the presence of Lewis and Brønsted acid sites, which were evaluated by diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy with a CO probe molecule. We propose that the CO 2 adsorption capability has a positive correlation with the catalytic performance toward CO 2 conversion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Horike, S., Shimomura, S., & Kitagawa, S. (2009) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.444 · Cited by 2,486
Shaikh, A.-A. G., & Sivaram, S. (1996) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr950067i · Cited by 1,381
Cited by
Carbon capture and conversion using metal–organic frameworks and MOF-based materials
Ding, M., Flaig, R. W., Jiang, H.-L., & Yaghi, O. M. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00829a · Cited by 2,616
Self-citationMultifunctional metal–organic framework catalysts: synergistic catalysis and tandem reactions
Huang, Y.-B., Liang, J., Wang, X.-S., & Cao, R. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00250a · Cited by 1,908
Metal–organic frameworks meet metal nanoparticles: synergistic effect for enhanced catalysis
Yang, Q., Xu, Q., & Jiang, H.-L. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00724d · Cited by 1,892
Self-citationThe chemistry of metal–organic frameworks for CO2 capture, regeneration and conversion
Trickett, C. A., Helal, A., Al-Maythalony, B. A., Yamani, Z. H., Cordova, K. E., & Yaghi, O. M. (2017) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2017.45 · Cited by 1,524
Liu, J., & Wöll, C. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00315c · Cited by 698
Liang, J., Huang, Y.-B., & Cao, R. (2019) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2017.11.013 · Cited by 444
Cui, W.-G., Zhang, G.-Y., Hu, T.-L., & Bu, X.-H. (2019) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2019.02.001 · Cited by 406
Defects in Metal–Organic Frameworks: Challenge or Opportunity?
Sholl, D. S., & Lively, R. P. (2015) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01135 · Cited by 357
Zhang, G., Wei, G., Liu, Z., Oliver, S. R. J., & Fei, H. (2016) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02511 · Cited by 217
Formation of CX Bonds in CO2 Chemical Fixation Catalyzed by Metal−Organic Frameworks
Hou, S., Dong, J., & Zhao, B. (2020) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201806163 · Cited by 142
Zhao, X., Chang, G., Xu, H., Yao, Y., Dong, D., Yang, S., Tian, G., & Yang, X. (2024) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.3c18885 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, Z., Wang, H., Hu, Y., Lu, J., & Jiang, H.
- Venue
- ChemSusChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-02-04
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 878-885
- ISSN
- 1864-5631 (ISSN-L)
- 1864-564X
- OpenAlex
- W2163383153
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
