The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Critical Look at Direct Catalytic Hydrogenation of Carbon Dioxide to Olefins
Open accessAbstract
One of the main initiatives for fighting climate change is to use carbon dioxide as a resource instead of waste. In this respect, thermocatalytic carbon dioxide hydrogenation to high‐added‐value chemicals is a promising process. Among the products of this reaction (alcohols, alkanes, olefins, or aromatics), light olefins are interesting because they are building blocks for making polymers, as well as other important chemicals. Olefins are mainly produced from fossil fuel sources, but the increasing demand of plastics boosts the need to develop more sustainable synthetic routes. This review gives a critical overview of the most recent achievements in direct carbon dioxide hydrogenation to light olefins, which can take place through two competitive routes: the modified Fischer–Tropsch synthesis and methanol‐mediated synthesis. Both routes are compared in terms of catalyst development, reaction performance, and reaction mechanisms. Furthermore, practical aspects of the commercialization of this reaction, such as renewable hydrogen production and carbon dioxide capture, compression, and transport, are discussed. It is concluded that, to date, the catalysts used in the carbon dioxide hydrogenation reaction give a wide product distribution, which reduces the specific selectivity to lower olefins. More efforts are needed to reach better control of the C/H surface ratio and interactions within the functionalities of the catalyst, as well as understanding the reaction mechanism and avoiding deactivation. Renewable H 2 production and carbon dioxide capture and transport technologies are being developed, although they are currently still too expensive for industrial application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Recent advances in catalytic hydrogenation of carbon dioxide
Wang, W., Wang, S., Ma, X., & Gong, J. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c1cs15008a · Cited by 3,316
Direct Capture of CO2 from Ambient Air
Sanz-Pérez, E. S., Murdock, C. R., Didas, S. A., & Jones, C. W. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00173 · Cited by 2,406
What Should We Make with CO2 and How Can We Make It?
Bushuyev, O. S., De Luna, P., Dinh, C. T., Tao, L., Saur, G., van de Lagemaat, J., Kelley, S. O., & Sargent, E. H. (2018) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2017.09.003 · Cited by 1,593
Cuéllar-Franca, R. M., & Azapagic, A. (2015) · Journal of CO2 Utilization · doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2014.12.001 · Cited by 1,571
Control of zeolite framework flexibility and pore topology for separation of ethane and ethylene
Bereciartua, P. J., Cantín, Á., Corma, A., Jordá, J. L., Palomino, M., Rey, F., Valencia, S., Corcoran, E. W., Kortunov, P., Ravikovitch, P. I., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao0092 · Cited by 460
Electrons to Reactors Multiscale Modeling: Catalytic CO Oxidation over RuO2
Sutton, J. E., Lorenzi, J. M., Krogel, J. T., Xiong, Q., Pannala, S., Matera, S., & Savara, A. (2018) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.8b00713 · Cited by 46
Cited by
Highly Active ZnO-ZrO2 Aerogels Integrated with H-ZSM-5 for Aromatics Synthesis from Carbon Dioxide
Zhou, C., Shi, J., Zhou, W., Cheng, K., Zhang, Q., Kang, J., & Wang, Y. (2020) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.9b04309 · Cited by 361
Applications of Zeolites to C1 Chemistry: Recent Advances, Challenges, and Opportunities
Zhang, Q., Yu, J., & Corma, A. (2020) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202002927 · Cited by 316
Xu, Y., Zhai, P., Deng, Y., Xie, J., Liu, X., Wang, S., & Ma, D. (2020) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202009620 · Cited by 258
Impacts of the Catalyst Structures on CO2 Activation on Catalyst Surfaces
Etim, U. J., Zhang, C., & Zhong, Z. (2021) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano11123265 · Cited by 175
Metadata
- Authors
- Ronda‐Lloret, M., Rothenberg, G., & Shiju, N. R.
- Venue
- ChemSusChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-08-07
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 3896-3914
- ISSN
- 1864-5631 (ISSN-L)
- 1864-564X
- OpenAlex
- W2965654673
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 4.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.