Cited by 63Global Educational Policies and ReformsTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesEducation Pedagogy and Practices

Teacher autonomy and teacher agency: a comparative study in Brazilian and Norwegian lower secondary education

Open access
Lennert da Silva, Ana Lucia, Mølstad, Christina Elde·2020·The Curriculum Journal

Abstract

Teacher autonomy and teacher agency are positively related to teachers’ motivation and engagement in teaching. This paper combines the concepts of teacher autonomy and teacher agency to study how Brazilian and Norwegian lower secondary teachers respond to an accountability system marked by a centralised outcomes‐based curriculum and testing. Teacher autonomy concerns the relations between teachers’ scope of action and the state’s role in providing resources and regulations that extend or constrain this scope of action. Teacher agency refers to teachers’ professional action based on their perceptions and experiences of their scope of action as they navigate accountability to respond to educational dilemmas at hand. The findings show that teachers navigate policies in a variety of forms to fit their needs and beliefs and those of their students. Brazilian teachers have a constrained scope of action and possibilities for achieving agency in comparison with their Norwegian counterparts. Norwegian teachers also have their individual autonomy constrained by extended state control over the curriculum and testing. However, the practice of collective work opens up for the exercise of agency because of the possibility of reflection and collective construction of teaching plans and strategies that frame and legitimise teaching work.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/curj.3

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As similar accountability-focused policies have begun to be implemented beyond anglophone contexts including Norway and Brazil, the findings from this study of teacher agency may have relevance for teacher educators and researchers working within higher levels of regulatory control.

    “As similar accountability-focused policies have begun to be implemented (although perhaps to a lesser extent) beyond anglophone contexts including for example Norway (Mausethagen et al., 2021) and Brazil (Lennert da Silva & Mølstad, 2020), the findings from this study of teacher agency may have relevance for teacher educators and researchers working within higher levels of regulatory control.”

    From Space as a lens for teacher agency: A case study of three beginning teachers in England, <scp>UK</scp> (2024) · cites this paper as Lennert da Silva & Mølstad, 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lennert da Silva, A. L., & Mølstad, C. E.
Affiliations
  • Høgskolen i Innlandet Norway
  • University of Inland Norway (NO)
Venue
The Curriculum Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-01-03
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
115-131
ISSN
  • 0958-5176 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-3704
OpenAlex
W2997864054
Cited by
63
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
25.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Curriculum Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Pedagogy and Practices
Keywords
teacher autonomy, teacher agency, educational accountability, lower secondary education, testing, scope of action, state control of education, teacher collaboration, teacher motivation, Brazil, Norway, comparative education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review