Cited by 99Global Educational Policies and ReformsEducational Theory and Curriculum StudiesTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

‘Complete freedom to choose within limits’ – teachers’ views of curricular autonomy, agency and control in Estonia, Finland and Germany

Erss, Maria·2018·The Curriculum Journal

Abstract

To examine different approaches to teacher autonomy in nation‐states, three countries were selected for a comparative study: Estonia, Finland and Germany. The emphasis of the study lies on the subjective perceptions of upper secondary school teachers (n = 33 semi‐structured interviews) regarding their curricular autonomy and experiences of being controlled by the system. The article discusses different concepts of teacher autonomy and agency theoretically and concludes that they are partly overlapping, but not the same. Agency can be understood as the realistic actualization of autonomy within the constraints of the teaching profession, while autonomy is, in theory, more liberating, focusing on self‐directedness, capacity for autonomous action and freedom from control. The data analysis showed that the expectations of teachers as to the amount of desired autonomy varied greatly. While the Finnish teachers in the study perceived control over teachers’ work to be unnecessary, due to their high professionalism, the Estonian and German teachers did not advocate absence of control, instead preferring to ‘have complete freedom to choose within limits.’

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09585176.2018.1445514

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

  • The role of beliefs in teacher agency

    Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325 · Cited by 1,318 · cited 5× · see citing works

    “Although there are various definitions of teacher agency, they all seem to have one central idea in common: developing teachers’ capacity for professional action at their own discretion, in order to enhance student learning (Biesta et al., 2015; Goodson, 2003; Nieveen, 2011; Pyh€alt€ o, Pietarinen, & Soini, 2012).”
    BackgroundInfluential

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Erss, M.
Affiliations
Tallinn University (EE)
Corresponding author
Erss, Maria
Venue
The Curriculum Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-04-03
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
238-256
ISSN
  • 0958-5176 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-3704
OpenAlex
W2791693177
Cited by
99
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1
FWCI
32.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Curriculum Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
European Social Fund (30.1-9.1/756)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
teacher autonomy, curriculum autonomy, teacher agency, teacher control, upper secondary school teachers, teacher perceptions, professionalism, comparative education, Estonia, Finland, Germany

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review