‘Complete freedom to choose within limits’ – teachers’ views of curricular autonomy, agency and control in Estonia, Finland and Germany
Abstract
To examine different approaches to teacher autonomy in nation‐states, three countries were selected for a comparative study: Estonia, Finland and Germany. The emphasis of the study lies on the subjective perceptions of upper secondary school teachers (n = 33 semi‐structured interviews) regarding their curricular autonomy and experiences of being controlled by the system. The article discusses different concepts of teacher autonomy and agency theoretically and concludes that they are partly overlapping, but not the same. Agency can be understood as the realistic actualization of autonomy within the constraints of the teaching profession, while autonomy is, in theory, more liberating, focusing on self‐directedness, capacity for autonomous action and freedom from control. The data analysis showed that the expectations of teachers as to the amount of desired autonomy varied greatly. While the Finnish teachers in the study perceived control over teachers’ work to be unnecessary, due to their high professionalism, the Estonian and German teachers did not advocate absence of control, instead preferring to ‘have complete freedom to choose within limits.’
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Much recent research which considers teacher agency has drawn on the ecological approach articulated by Priestley et al. (2015).
“Much recent research (e.g.Erss, 2018;Leijen et al., 2020) which considers teacher agency has drawn on the ecological approach articulated by Priestley et al. (2015).”
From Space as a lens for teacher agency: A case study of three beginning teachers in England, <scp>UK</scp> (2024) · cites this paper as Erss, 2018
Cites
The role of beliefs in teacher agency
Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325 · Cited by 1,318 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Although there are various definitions of teacher agency, they all seem to have one central idea in common: developing teachers’ capacity for professional action at their own discretion, in order to enhance student learning (Biesta et al., 2015; Goodson, 2003; Nieveen, 2011; Pyh€alt€ o, Pietarinen, & Soini, 2012).”
BackgroundInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lennert da Silva, A. L., & Mølstad, C. E. (2020) · The Curriculum Journal · doi:10.1002/curj.3 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
“In contrast, teacher agency focuses on the capacity for professional action given the resources and limitations of their working environment (Erss, 2018).”
BackgroundInfluentialRushton, E. A. C., & Bird, A. (2024) · The Curriculum Journal · doi:10.1002/curj.224 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“Much recent research (e.g. Erss, 2018; Leijen et al., 2020) which considers teacher agency has drawn on the ecological approach articulated by Priestley et al. (2015).”
Background
- Authors
- Erss, M.
- Affiliations
- Tallinn University (EE)
- Corresponding author
- Erss, Maria
- ORCID
- Erss, Maria
- Venue
- The Curriculum Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-04-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 238-256
- ISSN
- 0958-5176 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2791693177
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 32.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Curriculum Journal (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- European Social Fund (30.1-9.1/756)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Keywords
- teacher autonomy, curriculum autonomy, teacher agency, teacher control, upper secondary school teachers, teacher perceptions, professionalism, comparative education, Estonia, Finland, Germany
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review