The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Limits of propidium iodide as a cell viability indicator for environmental bacteria
Abstract
Background: Viability measurements of individual bacteria are applied in various scopes of research and industry using approaches where propidium iodide (PI) serves as dead cell indicator. The reliability of PI uptake as a cell viability indicator for dead (PI permeable) and viable (PI impermeable) bacteria was tested using two soil bacteria, the gram−Sphingomonas sp. LB126 and the gram+Mycobacterium frederiksbergense LB501T. Methods: Bacterial proliferation activities observed viaDAPI and Hoechst 33342 staining were linked to the energy charge and the proportion of dead cells as obtained by diOC 6 (3)‐staining and PI‐uptake, respectively. Calibration and verification experiments were performed using batch cultures grown on different substrates. Results: PI uptake depended on the physiological state of the bacterial cells. Unexpectedly, up to 40% of both strains were stained by PI during early exponential growth on glucose when compared to 2–5% of cells in the early stationary phase of growth. Conclusions: The results question the utility of PI as a universal indicator for the viability of (environmental) bacteria. It rather appears that in addition to nonviable cells, PI also stains growing cells of Sphingomonas sp. and M. frederiksbergense during a short period of their life cycle. © 2007 International Society for Analytical Cytology
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stiefel, P., Schmidt-Emrich, S., Maniura-Weber, K., & Ren, Q. (2015) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/s12866-015-0376-x · Cited by 710
Microbial Biofilms in the Food Industry—A Comprehensive Review
Carrascosa, C., Raheem, D., Ramos, F., Saraiva, A., & Raposo, A. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18042014 · Cited by 459
Propidium iodide staining underestimates viability of adherent bacterial cells
Rosenberg, M., Azevedo, N. F., & Ivask, A. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-42906-3 · Cited by 447
de Calignon, A., Spires-Jones, T. L., Pitstick, R., Carlson, G. A., & Hyman, B. T. (2009) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1097/nen.0b013e3181a9fc66 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Shi, L., Günther, S., Hübschmann, T., Wick, L. Y., Harms, H., & Müller, S.
- Venue
- Cytometry Part A
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-04-09
- Volume
- 71A
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 592-598
- ISSN
- 1552-4922 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4930
- OpenAlex
- W2080228586
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Limits of propidium iodide as a cell viability indicator for environmental bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cyto.a.20402
- The paper
- Shi, L., Günther, S., Hübschmann, T., Wick, L. Y., Harms, H., & Müller, S. (2007). Limits of propidium iodide as a cell viability indicator for environmental bacteria. Cytometry Part A. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.20402
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.