The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Critical aspects of using bacterial cell viability assays with the fluorophores SYTO9 and propidium iodide
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Viability staining with SYTO9 and propidium iodide (PI) is a frequently used tool in microbiological studies. However, data generated by such routinely used method are often not critically evaluated for their accuracy. In this study we aim to investigate the critical aspects of this staining method using Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa as the model microorganisms for high throughput studies in microtiter plates. SYTO9 or PI was added alone or consecutively together to cells and the fluorescence intensities were measured using microplate reader and confocal laser scanning microscope. RESULTS: We found that staining of S. aureus cells with SYTO9 alone resulted in equal signal intensity for both live and dead cells, whereas staining of P. aeruginosa cells led to 18-fold stronger signal strength for dead cells than for live ones. After counterstaining with PI, the dead P. aeruginosa cells still exhibited stronger SYTO9 signal than the live cells. We also observed that SYTO9 signal showed strong bleaching effect and decreased dramatically over time. PI intensity of the culture increased linearly with the increase of dead cell numbers, however, the maximum intensities were rather weak compared to SYTO9 and background values. Thus, slight inaccuracy in measurement of PI signal could have significant effect on the outcome. CONCLUSIONS: When viability staining with SYTO9 and PI is performed, several factors need to be considered such as the bleaching effect of SYTO9, different binding affinity of SYTO9 to live and dead cells and background fluorescence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antiseptics and Disinfectants: Activity, Action, and Resistance
McDonnell, G., & Russell, A. D. (1999) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.12.1.147 · Cited by 4,780
Complex formation between ethidium bromide and nucleic acids
Waring, M. J. (1965) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(65)80096-1 · Cited by 1,512
Boulos, L., Prévost, M., Barbeau, B., Coallier, J., & Desjardins, R. (1999) · Journal of Microbiological Methods · doi:10.1016/s0167-7012(99)00048-2 · Cited by 1,125
Berney, M., Hammes, F., Bosshard, F., Weilenmann, H.-U., & Egli, T. (2007) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02750-06 · Cited by 924
Bacterial Viability and Culturability
Barer, M. R., & Harwood, C. R. (1999) · Advances in Microbial Physiology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2911(08)60166-6 · Cited by 376
Mechanism and use of the commercially available viability stain, Bac Light
Stocks, S. M. (2004) · Cytometry Part A · doi:10.1002/cyto.a.20069 · Cited by 369
On the Structural Stability and Solvent Denaturation of Proteins
Herskovits, T. T., Gadegbeku, B., & Jaillet, H. (1970) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)63111-4 · Cited by 350
Limits of propidium iodide as a cell viability indicator for environmental bacteria
Shi, L., Günther, S., Hübschmann, T., Wick, L. Y., Harms, H., & Müller, S. (2007) · Cytometry Part A · doi:10.1002/cyto.a.20402 · Cited by 275
Tawakoli, P. N., Al-Ahmad, A., Hoth-Hannig, W., Hannig, M., & Hannig, C. (2013) · Clinical Oral Investigations · doi:10.1007/s00784-012-0792-3 · Cited by 258
Grégori, G., Citterio, S., Ghiani, A., Labra, M., Sgorbati, S., Brown, S., & Denis, M. (2001) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.67.10.4662-4670.2001 · Cited by 246
Cited by
Propidium iodide staining underestimates viability of adherent bacterial cells
Rosenberg, M., Azevedo, N. F., & Ivask, A. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-42906-3 · Cited by 447
A biosynthetic pathway for a prominent class of microbiota-derived bile acids
Devlin, A. S., & Fischbach, M. A. (2015) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.1864 · Cited by 448
Mode-of-Action of Antimicrobial Peptides: Membrane Disruption vs. Intracellular Mechanisms
Benfield, A. H., & Henriques, S. T. (2020) · Frontiers in Medical Technology · doi:10.3389/fmedt.2020.610997 · Cited by 367
Foley, M. H., O’Flaherty, S., Allen, G., Rivera, A. J., Stewart, A. K., Barrangou, R., & Theriot, C. M. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2017709118 · Cited by 205
Foley, M. H., Walker, M. E., Stewart, A. K., O’Flaherty, S., Gentry, E. C., Patel, S., Beaty, V. V., Allen, G., Pan, M., Simpson, J. B., et al. (2023) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-023-01337-7 · Cited by 181
Metadata
- Authors
- Stiefel, P., Schmidt-Emrich, S., Maniura-Weber, K., & Ren, Q.
- Venue
- BMC Microbiology
- Published
- 2015-02-18
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 36-36
- ISSN
- 1471-2180 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070451836
- Cited by
- 710
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 24.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical aspects of using bacterial cell viability assays with the fluorophores SYTO9 and propidium iodide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12866-015-0376-x
- The paper
- Stiefel, P., Schmidt-Emrich, S., Maniura-Weber, K., & Ren, Q. (2015). Critical aspects of using bacterial cell viability assays with the fluorophores SYTO9 and propidium iodide. BMC Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-015-0376-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
