Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 237

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Detection of TiO2 nanoparticles in cells by flow cytometry

Open access
Zucker, R. M., Massaro, E. J., Sanders, K. M., Degn, L. L., Boyes, W. K.·2010·Cytometry Part A

Abstract

Evaluation of the potential hazard of man‐made nanomaterials has been hampered by a limited ability to observe and measure nanoparticles in cells. In this study, different concentrations of TiO 2 nanoparticles were suspended in cell culture medium. The suspension was then sonicated and characterized by dynamic light scattering and microscopy. Cultured human‐derived retinal pigment epithelial cells (ARPE‐19) were incubated with TiO 2 nanoparticles at 0, 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, 10, and 30 μg/ml for 24 hours. Cellular reactions to nanoparticles were evaluated using flow cytometry and dark field microscopy. A FACSCalibur™ flow cytometer was used to measure changes in light scatter after nanoparticle incubation. Both the side scatter and forward scatter changed substantially in response to the TiO 2. From 0.1 to 30 μg/ml TiO 2, the side scatter increased sequentially while the forward scatter decreased, presumably due to substantial light reflection by the TiO 2 particles. Based on the parameters of morphology and the calcein‐AM/propidium iodide viability assay, TiO 2 concentrations below 30 μg/ml TiO 2 caused minimal cytotoxicity. Microscopic analysis was done on the same cells using an E‐800 Nikon microscope containing a xenon light source and special dark field objectives. At the lowest concentrations of TiO 2 (0.1–0.3 μg/ml), the flow cytometer could detect as few as 5–10 nanoparticles per cell due to intense light scattering by TiO 2. Rings of concentrated nanoparticles were observed around the nuclei in the vicinity of the endoplasmic reticulum at higher concentrations. These data suggest that the uptake of nanoparticles within cells can be monitored with flow cytometry and confirmed by dark field microscopy. This approach may help fulfill a critical need for the scientific community to assess the relationship between nanoparticle dose and cellular toxicity Such experiments could potentially be performed more quickly and easily using the flow cytometer to measure both nanoparticle uptake and cellular health. Published 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cyto.a.20927

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 237

Metadata

Authors
Zucker, R. M., Massaro, E. J., Sanders, K. M., Degn, L. L., & Boyes, W. K.
Venue
Cytometry Part A
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-06-25
Volume
77A
Issue
7
Pages
677-685
ISSN
  • 1552-4922 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4930
OpenAlex
W2069467605
Cited by
237
References
0
FWCI
5.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of TiO2 nanoparticles in cells by flow cytometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cyto.a.20927
The paper
Zucker, R. M., Massaro, E. J., Sanders, K. M., Degn, L. L., & Boyes, W. K. (2010). Detection of TiO2 nanoparticles in cells by flow cytometry. Cytometry Part A. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.20927

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.