Cited by 50Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTreatment of Major DepressionPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Long-term effectiveness of cognitive therapy in major depressive disorder

Open access
Hensley, Paula L., Nadiga, Deepa, Uhlenhuth, E.H.·2004·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

Cognitive therapy of depression, based on the cognitive theory of depression, is an established treatment for major depressive disorder. Although few clinicians expect acute treatment of depression with antidepressant medication to prevent long-term relapse of the illness, some practitioners of cognitive therapy report long-term effectiveness in preventing relapse after short-term treatment. We set out to reanalyze follow-up studies in the literature, using intent-to-treat principles to assess the long-term effects of acute treatment with cognitive therapy. From an initial reference list of 97 citations that met our search criteria (controlled clinical trials of cognitive therapy in depression with follow-up), we found five trials that met our inclusion criteria. This report reviews and reanalyzes these five trials, published between 1981 and 1992, which compare cognitive therapy and tricyclic antidepressant therapy. Overall, the evidence favors a longer-term effect for cognitive therapy over tricyclic antidepressants alone.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.20022

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cognitive behavioural therapy and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy have shown longer-lasting effects in preventing relapse in adults, some comparable to medication alone.

    “Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) (Fava 1998; Hensley 2004) and, more recently, mindfulnessbased cognitive therapy (MBCT), have shown longer-lasting effects (Ma 2004; Teasdale 2000), some of which are comparable to that achieved by medication alone (Segal 2010).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hensley, P. L., Nadiga, D., & Uhlenhuth, E. H.
Affiliations
University of New Mexico (US)
Corresponding author
Hensley, Paula L.
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Published
2004
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
1-7
ISSN
  • 1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6394
OpenAlex
W2059447225
Cited by
49
References
22
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
9.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
cognitive therapy, major depressive disorder, tricyclic antidepressants, acute treatment, follow-up study, cognitive theories of depression
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic, Combined Modality Therapy, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Patient Dropouts, Research Design, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review