Cited by 21Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPain Management and Placebo Effect

A CLINICIAN-ADMINISTERED SEVERITY RATING SCALE FOR ILLNESS ANXIETY: DEVELOPMENT, RELIABILITY, AND VALIDITY OF THE H-YBOCS-M: Research Article: Development of the Hypochondriasis-YBOCS-Modified

Open access
Skritskaya, Natalia A., Carson-Wong, Amanda R., Moeller, James R., Shen, Sa, Barsky, Arthur J., Fallon, Brian A.·2012·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinician-administered measures to assess severity of illness anxiety and response to treatment are few. The authors evaluated a modified version of the hypochondriasis-Y-BOCS (H-YBOCS-M), a 19-item, semistructured, clinician-administered instrument designed to rate severity of illness-related thoughts, behaviors, and avoidance. METHODS: The scale was administered to 195 treatment-seeking adults with DSM-IV hypochondriasis. Test-retest reliability was assessed in a subsample of 20 patients. Interrater reliability was assessed by 27 interviews independently rated by four raters. Sensitivity to change was evaluated in a subsample of 149 patients. Convergent and discriminant validity was examined by comparing H-YBOCS-M scores to other measures administered. Item clustering was examined with confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses. RESULTS: The H-YBOCS-M demonstrated good internal consistency, interrater and test-retest reliability, and sensitivity to symptom change with treatment. Construct validity was supported by significant higher correlations with scores on other measures of hypochondriasis than with nonhypochondriacal measures. Improvement over time in response to treatment correlated with improvement both on measures of hypochondriasis and on measures of somatization, depression, anxiety, and functional status. Confirmatory factor analysis did not show adequate fit for a three-factor model. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a five-factor solution with the first two factors consistent with the separation of the H-YBOCS-M items into the subscales of illness-related avoidance and compulsions. CONCLUSIONS: H-YBOCS-M appears to be valid, reliable, and appropriate as an outcome measure for treatment studies of illness anxiety. Study results highlight "avoidance" as a key feature of illness anxiety-with potentially important nosologic and treatment implications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.21949

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [10]Kellner R Abridged Manual of the Illness Attitude Scales (Mimeographed) Albuquerque, NM University of New Mexico Press 1987
  2. [25]Spielberger CD Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y) Palo Alto, CA Consulting Psychologists Press 1983

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skritskaya, N. A., Carson-Wong, A. R., Moeller, J. R., Shen, S., Barsky, A. J., & Fallon, B. A.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Skritskaya, Natalia A.
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Published
2012-04-13
Volume
29
Issue
7
Pages
652-664
ISSN
1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1960303646
Cited by
21
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH071456, R01MH071688)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
fear of illness, health anxiety, severity rating scale, somatization, treatment outcome measures, sensitivity to change, factor structure
MeSH terms
Adult, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Hypochondriasis, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review