Cited by 64Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchSleep and related disordersTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Mobile assessment of heightened skin conductance in posttraumatic stress disorder: H inrichs et al .

Open access
Hinrichs, Rebecca, Michopoulos, Vasiliki, Winters, Sterling, Rothbaum, Alex O., Rothbaum, Barbara O., Ressler, Kerry J., Jovanovic, Tanja·2017·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increased psychophysiological reactivity is a hallmark intermediate phenotype of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Individuals with PTSD exhibit greater skin conductance (SC) responses to trauma scripts than trauma survivors without PTSD. However, trauma scripts require time for development and cannot be easily used in a single visit. Thus, there is a need for a low-cost, easy-to-use, SC recording protocol for PTSD assessment. METHODS: Using a mobile device (eSense) connected to a portable tablet computer, we assessed SC reactivity to a standard trauma interview (STI) in 63 participants recruited from Grady Memorial Hospital in Atlanta, GA, approximately 1 year after trauma exposure. SC response (SCR) was calculated by subtracting the SC level (SCL) at the end of the baseline recording from the maximum SCL during the STI. RESULTS: SCL was significantly higher during the STI compared to baseline (P < .001), and individuals with PTSD showed significantly greater SCR than individuals without PTSD (P = .006). Logistic regression using SCR with PTSD diagnosis as the outcome showed an odds ratio of 1.76 (95% CI: 1.11-2.78). Lastly, higher SCR during the STI was also significantly associated with PTSD symptom total score controlling for demographics and trauma severity (b = 0.42, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrated feasibility of the use of a mobile device for assessing psychophysiological reactivity in those with PTSD. The use of this low-cost, easy-to-use mobile device to collect objective physiological data in concert with a STI can be easily disseminated in clinical and research settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.22610

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • New technological advances allow for low-burden measures of psychophysiology without need for specialized training.

    “These new technological advances allow for low-burden measures of psychophysiology without need for specialized training (Hinrichs et al., 2017).”

    From Physiological feelings (2019) · cites this paper as Hinrichs et al., 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hinrichs, R., Michopoulos, V., Winters, S., Rothbaum, A. O., Rothbaum, B. O., Ressler, K. J., & Jovanovic, T.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences; Emory University School of Medicine; Atlanta GA USA
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-02-21
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
502-507
ISSN
1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2589417566
Cited by
64
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Research and Woodruff Health Sciences IT Division (UL1 TR000424)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (R01 MH094757, K12 HD085850, R21 MH106902)
  • Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (HD085850)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH094757, MH106902)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, skin conductance response, psychophysiological reactivity, endophenotypes, PTSD symptom severity, trauma exposure
MeSH terms
Adult, Feasibility Studies, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review