Cited by 23Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

NODDI in gray matter is a sensitive marker of aging and early AD changes

Open access
Yu, Xi, Przybelski, Scott A., Reid, Robert I., Lesnick, Timothy G., Raghavan, Sheelakumari, Graff‐Radford, Jonathan, Lowe, Val J., Kantarci, Kejal +4 more·2024·Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Age‐related and Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia–related neurodegeneration impact brain health. While morphometric measures from T1‐weighted scans are established biomarkers, they may be less sensitive to earlier changes. Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI), offering biologically meaningful interpretation of tissue microstructure, may be an advanced brain health biomarker. METHODS: We contrasted regional gray matter NODDI and morphometric evaluations concerning their correlation with (1) age, (2) clinical diagnosis stage, and (3) tau pathology as assessed by AV1451 positron emission tomography. RESULTS: Our study hypothesizes that NODDI measures are more sensitive to aging and early AD changes than morphometric measures. One NODDI output, free water fraction (FWF), showed higher sensitivity to age‐related changes, generally better effect sizes in separating mild cognitively impaired from cognitively unimpaired participants, and stronger associations with regional tau deposition than morphometric measures. DISCUSSION: These findings underscore NODDI's utility in capturing early neurodegenerative changes and enhancing our understanding of aging and AD. Highlights: Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging can serve as an effective brain health biomarker for aging and early Alzheimer's disease (AD). Free water fraction has higher sensitivity to normal brain aging. Free water fraction has stronger associations with early AD and regional tau deposition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/dad2.12627

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. [1]Bethlehem RAI, Seidlitz J, White SR, et al. Brain charts for the human lifespan. Nature. 2022; 604(7906): 525‐ 533. 35388223 PMC9021021
  2. [2]Bakkour A, Morris JC, Wolk DA, Dickerson BC. The effects of aging and Alzheimer's disease on cerebral cortical anatomy: specificity and differential relationships with cognition. Neuroimage. 2013; 76: 332‐ 344. 23507382 PMC4098706
  3. [3]Fjell AM, McEvoy L, Holland D, Dale AM, Walhovd KB. Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging I. What is normal in normal aging? Effects of aging, amyloid and Alzheimer's disease on the cerebral cortex and the hippocampus. Prog Neurobiol. 2014; 117: 20‐ 40. 24548606 PMC4343307
  4. [4]Hwang G, Abdulkadir A, Erus G, et al. Disentangling Alzheimer's disease neurodegeneration from typical brain ageing using machine learning. Brain Commun. 2022; 4(3): fcac117. 35611306 PMC9123890
  5. [5]Neth BJ, Graff‐Radford J, Mielke MM, et al. Relationship between risk factors and brain reserve in late middle age: implications for cognitive aging. Front Aging Neurosci. 2019; 11: 355. 31998113 PMC6962238
  6. [6]Walhovd KB, Lovden M, Fjell AM. Timing of lifespan influences on brain and cognition. Trends Cogn Sci. 2023; 27(10): 901‐ 915. 37563042
  7. [7]Sullivan EV, Pfefferbaum A. Diffusion tensor imaging and aging. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006; 30(6): 749‐ 761. 16887187
  8. [8]Salminen LE, Conturo TE, Laidlaw DH, et al. Regional age differences in gray matter diffusivity among healthy older adults. Brain Imaging Behav. 2016; 10(1): 203‐ 211. 25864197 PMC4601925
  9. [11]Merluzzi AP, Dean DC 3rd, Adluru N, et al. Age‐dependent differences in brain tissue microstructure assessed with neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging. Neurobiol Aging. 2016; 43: 79‐ 88. 27255817 PMC4893194
  10. [12]Venkatesh A, Stark SM, Stark CEL, Bennett IJ. Age‐ and memory‐ related differences in hippocampal gray matter integrity are better captured by NODDI compared to single‐tensor diffusion imaging. Neurobiol Aging. 2020; 96: 12‐ 21. 32905951 PMC7722017
  11. [13]Radhakrishnan H, Stark SM, Stark CEL. Microstructural alterations in hippocampal subfields mediate age‐related memory decline in humans. Front Aging Neurosci. 2020; 12: 94. 32327992 PMC7161377
  12. [14]Colgan N, Siow B, O'Callaghan JM, et al. Application of neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) to a tau pathology model of Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage. 2016; 125: 739‐ 744. 26505297 PMC4692518
  13. [15]Samudra N, Lane‐Donovan C, VandeVrede L, Boxer AL. Tau pathology in neurodegenerative disease: disease mechanisms and therapeutic avenues. J Clin Invest. 2023; 133(12): e168553. 37317972 PMC10266783
  14. [16]Roberts RO, Geda YE, Knopman DS, et al. The Mayo Clinic Study of Aging: design and sampling, participation, baseline measures and sample characteristics. Neuroepidemiology. 2008; 30(1): 58‐ 69. 18259084 PMC2821441
  15. [17]St Sauver JL, Grossardt BR, Yawn BP, et al. Data resource profile: the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) medical records‐linkage system. Int J Epidemiol. 2012; 41(6): 1614‐ 1624. 23159830 PMC3535751
  16. [18]Petersen RC, Roberts RO, Knopman DS, et al. Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment is higher in men. The Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. Neurology. 2010; 75(10): 889‐ 897. 20820000 PMC2938972
  17. [19]Schwarz CG, Gunter JL, Wiste HJ, et al. A large‐scale comparison of cortical thickness and volume methods for measuring Alzheimer's disease severity. Neuroimage Clin. 2016; 11: 802‐ 812. 28050342 PMC5187496
  18. [20]Raghavan S, Reid RI, Przybelski SA, et al. Diffusion models reveal white matter microstructural changes with ageing, pathology and cognition. Brain Commun. 2021; 3(2): fcab106. 34136811 PMC8202149
  19. [21]Veraart J, Novikov DS, Christiaens D, Ades‐Aron B, Sijbers J, Fieremans E. Denoising of diffusion MRI using random matrix theory. Neuroimage. 2016; 142: 394‐ 406. 27523449 PMC5159209
  20. [22]Andersson JLR, Sotiropoulos SN. An integrated approach to correction for off‐resonance effects and subject movement in diffusion MR imaging. Neuroimage. 2016; 125: 1063‐ 1078. 26481672 PMC4692656
  21. [23]Kellner E, Dhital B, Kiselev VG, Reisert M. Gibbs‐ringing artifact removal based on local subvoxel‐shifts. Magn Reson Med. 2016; 76(5): 1574‐ 1581. 26745823
  22. [24]Koay CG, Ozarslan E, Basser PJ. A signal transformational framework for breaking the noise floor and its applications in MRI. J Magn Reson. 2009; 197(2): 108‐ 119. 19138540 PMC2765718
  23. [25]Jack CR Jr, Wiste HJ, Weigand SD, et al. Defining imaging biomarker cut points for brain aging and Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2017; 13(3): 205‐ 216. 27697430 PMC5344738
  24. [26]Hu Y, Kirmess KM, Meyer MR, et al. Assessment of a plasma amyloid probability score to estimate amyloid positron emission tomography findings among adults with cognitive impairment. JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(4): e228392. 35446396 PMC9024390
  25. [27]Tian J, Raghavan S, Reid RI, et al. White matter degeneration pathways associated with tau deposition in Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2023; 100(22): e2269‐ e2278. 37068958 PMC10259272
  26. [28]Jack CR Jr, Wiste HJ, Therneau TM, et al. Associations of amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration biomarker profiles with rates of memory decline among individuals without dementia. JAMA. 2019; 321(23): 2316‐ 2325. 31211344 PMC6582267
  27. [29]Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini‐mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12(3): 189‐ 198. 1202204
  28. [31]Goel P, Chakrabarti S, Goel K, Bhutani K, Chopra T, Bali S. Neuronal cell death mechanisms in Alzheimer's disease: an insight. Front Mol Neurosci. 2022; 15: 937133. 36090249 PMC9454331
  29. [32]Castelli V, Benedetti E, Antonosante A, et al. Neuronal cells rearrangement during aging and neurodegenerative disease: metabolism, oxidative stress and organelles dynamic. Front Mol Neurosci. 2019; 12: 132. 31191244 PMC6546816
  30. [34]Flynn SW, Lang DJ, Mackay AL, et al. Abnormalities of myelination in schizophrenia detected in vivo with MRI, and post‐mortem with analysis of oligodendrocyte proteins. Mol Psychiatry. 2003; 8(9): 811‐ 820. 12931208
  31. [35]Kolasinski J, Stagg CJ, Chance SA, et al. A combined post‐mortem magnetic resonance imaging and quantitative histological study of multiple sclerosis pathology. Brain. 2012; 135(10): 2938‐ 2951. Pt. 23065787 PMC3470716
  32. [36]Cao M, Luo Y, Wu Z, Wu K, Li X. Abnormal neurite density and orientation dispersion in frontal lobe link to elevated hyperactive/impulsive behaviours in young adults with traumatic brain injury. Brain Commun. 2022; 4(1): fcac011. 35187485 PMC8853727
  33. [38]Fu X, Shrestha S, Sun M, et al. Microstructural white matter alterations in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: study based on neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI). Clin Neuroradiol. 2020; 30(3): 569‐ 579. 31175374
  34. [39]Gozdas E, Fingerhut H, Dacorro L, Bruno JL, Hosseini SMH. Neurite imaging reveals widespread alterations in gray and white matter neurite morphology in healthy aging and amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Cereb Cortex. 2021; 31(12): 5570‐ 5578. 34313731 PMC8568001
  35. [40]Andica C, Kamagata K, Kirino E, et al. Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging reveals white matter microstructural alterations in adults with autism. Mol Autism. 2021; 12(1): 48. 34193257 PMC8247240
  36. [41]Nazeri A, Chakravarty MM, Rotenberg DJ, et al. Functional consequences of neurite orientation dispersion and density in humans across the adult lifespan. J Neurosci. 2015; 35(4): 1753‐ 1762. 25632148 PMC4308611
  37. [42]Ferreira D, Nordberg A, Westman E. Biological subtypes of Alzheimer disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Neurology. 2020; 94(10): 436‐ 448. 32047067 PMC7238917
  38. [43]Yu L, Boyle PA, Dawe RJ, Bennett DA, Arfanakis K, Schneider JA. Contribution of TDP and hippocampal sclerosis to hippocampal volume loss in older‐old persons. Neurology. 2020; 94(2): e142‐ e152. 31757868 PMC6988988
  39. [44]de Flores R, Wisse LEM, Das SR, et al. Contribution of mixed pathology to medial temporal lobe atrophy in Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2020; 16(6): 843‐ 852. 32323446 PMC7715004
  40. [45]Ringman JM, O'Neill J, Geschwind D, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging in preclinical and presymptomatic carriers of familial Alzheimer's disease mutations. Brain. 2007; 130: 1767‐ 1776. 17522104
  41. [46]Kantarci K, Petersen RC, Boeve BF, et al. DWI predicts future progression to Alzheimer disease in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Neurology. 2005; 64(5): 902‐ 904. 15753434 PMC2771335
  42. [48]Vogt NM, Hunt JF, Adluru N, et al. Cortical microstructural alterations in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease dementia. Cereb Cortex. 2020; 30(5): 2948‐ 2960. 31833550 PMC7197091
  43. [49]Weston PSJ, Coath W, Harris MJ, et al. Cortical tau is associated with microstructural imaging biomarkers of neurite density and dendritic complexity in Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2023; 19(6): 2750‐ 2754. 36932979 PMC10614698
  44. [50]Lee P, Kim HR, Jeong Y. Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging I. Detection of gray matter microstructural changes in Alzheimer's disease continuum using fiber orientation. BMC Neurol. 2020; 20(1): 362. 33008321 PMC7532608

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, X., Przybelski, S. A., Reid, R. I., Lesnick, T. G., Raghavan, S., Graff‐Radford, J., Lowe, V. J., Kantarci, K., Knopman, D. S., Petersen, R. C., Jack, C. R., & Vemuri, P.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Vemuri, Prashanthi
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-07
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
e12627-e12627
ISSN
2352-8729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401090831
Cited by
23
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13
FWCI
5.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (U01 AG006786, R01 AG056366, R01 AG034676, R37 AG011378, R01 AG041851, R01 NS097495, P30 AG062677, RF1 AG069052)
  • GHR Foundation
  • Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
NODDI, gray matter microstructure, brain aging, early Alzheimer's disease, free water fraction, tau pathology, mild cognitive impairment, neurodegeneration biomarkers, T1-weighted imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review