Cited by 134Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

DTI analyses and clinical applications in Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
Oishi, Kenichi, Mielke, Michelle M., Albert, Marilyn, Lyketsos, Constantine G., Mori, Susumu·2011·Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract

DTI is one of the most effective MR tools for the investigation of the brain anatomy. In addition to the gray matter, histopathological studies indicate that white matter is also a good target for both the early diagnosis of AD and for monitoring disease progression, which motivates us to use DTI to study AD patients in vivo. There are already a large amount of studies reporting significant differences between AD patients and controls, as well as to predict progression of disease in symptomatic non-demented individuals. Application of these findings in clinical practice remains to be demonstrated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-2011-0007

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The caudate putamen (CPu) was similar in size to the overall hippocampus and little FC alteration in the 3xTg-AD model was suspected in comparison to the known hippocampal alterations.

    “The CPu was used as a FC control for SBA analysis as it was similar in size to the overall hippocampus and little FC alteration in the 3xTg-AD model was suspected in comparison to the known hippocampal alterations (Oddo et al., 2003; Oishi et al., 2011; Shah et al., 2016, 2018).”

    From Early stage alterations in white matter and decreased functional interhemispheric hippocampal connectivity in the 3xTg mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. (2019) · cites this paper as Oishi et al., 2011

    In “WHAT IS THE POTENTIAL OF DTI TO EVALUATE THE AD BRAIN?” (page not available), the paper reports hippocampal abnormalities in Alzheimer’s disease. It does not address CPu size, its use as a functional-connectivity control, or expected connectivity changes in the 3xTg-AD model. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has demonstrated increased mean diffusivity (MD) associated with the hippocampus and gray matter atrophy in AD patients.

    “Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has demonstrated increased medial diffusivity (MD) associated with the hippocampus and gray matter (GM) atrophy in AD patients (Oishi et al., 2011).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [6]Pajevic S Pierpaoli C Color schemes to represent the orientation of anisotropic tissues from diffusion tensor data: application to white matter fiber tract mapping in the human brain Magn Reson Med 1999 42 526 540 10467297
  2. [55]Xue R van Zijl PC Crain BJ Solaiyappan M Mori S In vivo three-dimensional reconstruction of rat brain axonal projections by diffusion tensor imaging Magn Reson Med 1999 42 1123 1127 10571934
  3. [65]Zhang H Yushkevich PA Alexander DC Gee JC Deformable registration of diffusion tensorMRimages with explicit orientation optimization Med Image Anal 2006 10 764 785 16899392

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oishi, K., Mielke, M. M., Albert, M., Lyketsos, C. G., & Mori, S.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Kennedy Krieger Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Oishi, Kenichi
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Published
2011-10-04
Volume
26
Issue
s3
Pages
287-296
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W1556823089
Cited by
134
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG020012, R21AG033774, R01-AG20012, P50AG005146)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (P01EB00195)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P41RR015241, U24RR021382)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
diffusion tensor imaging, Alzheimer's disease
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review