Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 474

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dose translation between laboratory animals and human in preclinical and clinical phases of drug development

Nair, Anroop, Morsy, Mohamed Aly, Jacob, Shery·2018·Drug Development Research

Abstract

Preclinical Research & Development Appropriate translation and determination of the maximum recommended starting dose in human is a vital task in new drug development and research. Allometric scaling is the most frequently used approach for dose extrapolation based on normalization of dose‐to‐body surface area. Misinterpretation of allometric dose conversion and safety factor application can lead to major problems in calculating maximum recommended safe starting dose in first‐in‐human clinical trials. Therefore, dose translation always necessitates careful consideration of body surface area, pharmacological, physiological and anatomical factors, pharmacokinetic parameters, metabolic function, receptor, and life span. The concept of estimating the first‐in‐human dose, interspecies scaling between species and the factors influencing the dose escalation were reviewed. The pros and cons of various approaches to determine first‐in‐human dose including allometric scaling, pharmacokinetically guided approach, minimal anticipated biological effect level, pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic modeling, similar drug approach, and microdosing were explained. The five steps to estimate maximum recommended starting dose for human studies by scaling factor were elaborated. Few examples, illustrating the application of different approaches were also demonstrated along with concerns that may be considered while applying such methods. Furthermore, typical considerations in dose administration, dosing through diet, maximum absorbable dose, blood sampling, and anesthesia in animal species were discussed. In summary, this review may serve as a concise guide for predicting human equivalent dose from animal species for researchers involved in various phases of preclinical and early clinical drug development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ddr.21461

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 474

Metadata

Authors
Nair, A., Morsy, M. A., & Jacob, S.
Venue
Drug Development Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-10-21
Volume
79
Issue
8
Pages
373-382
ISSN
  • 0272-4391 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2299
OpenAlex
W2896249550
Cited by
474
References
25
FWCI
27.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dose translation between laboratory animals and human in preclinical and clinical phases of drug development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ddr.21461
The paper
Nair, A., Morsy, M. A., & Jacob, S. (2018). Dose translation between laboratory animals and human in preclinical and clinical phases of drug development. Drug Development Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddr.21461

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.