The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dose translation between laboratory animals and human in preclinical and clinical phases of drug development
Abstract
Preclinical Research & Development Appropriate translation and determination of the maximum recommended starting dose in human is a vital task in new drug development and research. Allometric scaling is the most frequently used approach for dose extrapolation based on normalization of dose‐to‐body surface area. Misinterpretation of allometric dose conversion and safety factor application can lead to major problems in calculating maximum recommended safe starting dose in first‐in‐human clinical trials. Therefore, dose translation always necessitates careful consideration of body surface area, pharmacological, physiological and anatomical factors, pharmacokinetic parameters, metabolic function, receptor, and life span. The concept of estimating the first‐in‐human dose, interspecies scaling between species and the factors influencing the dose escalation were reviewed. The pros and cons of various approaches to determine first‐in‐human dose including allometric scaling, pharmacokinetically guided approach, minimal anticipated biological effect level, pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic modeling, similar drug approach, and microdosing were explained. The five steps to estimate maximum recommended starting dose for human studies by scaling factor were elaborated. Few examples, illustrating the application of different approaches were also demonstrated along with concerns that may be considered while applying such methods. Furthermore, typical considerations in dose administration, dosing through diet, maximum absorbable dose, blood sampling, and anesthesia in animal species were discussed. In summary, this review may serve as a concise guide for predicting human equivalent dose from animal species for researchers involved in various phases of preclinical and early clinical drug development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Simple Practice Guide for Dose Conversion between Animals and Human
Nair, A., & Jacob, S. (2016) · Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy · doi:10.4103/0976-0105.177703 · Cited by 6,174
Self-citationDiehl, K., Hull, R., Morton, D., Pfister, R., Rabemampianina, Y., Smith, D., Vidal, J., & Vorstenbosch, C. V. D. (2001) · Journal of Applied Toxicology · doi:10.1002/jat.727 · Cited by 1,562
Blood sample collection in small laboratory animals
S, P., R, R., & R, K. (2010) · Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics · doi:10.4103/0976-500x.72350 · Cited by 1,070
Turner, P. V., Brabb, T., Pekow, C. A., & Vasbinder, M. A. (2011) · PubMed · Cited by 1,032
To Scale or Not to Scale: The Principles of Dose Extrapolation
Sharma, V., & McNeill, J. H. (2009) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00267.x · Cited by 544
Interpretation of Animal Dose and Human Equivalent Dose for Drug Development
Shin, J., Seol, I.-C., & Son, C. (2010) · Cited by 243
A general basis for quarter-power scaling in animals
Banavar, J. R., Moses, M. E., Brown, J. H., Damuth, J., Rinaldo, A., Sibly, R. M., & Maritan, A. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1009974107 · Cited by 212
Carbone, L., & Austin, J. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155001 · Cited by 191
Metabolic Scaling in Animals: Methods, Empirical Results, and Theoretical Explanations
White, C. R., & Kearney, M. R. (2014) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c110049 · Cited by 181
Comparisons of Diets Used in Animal Models of High-Fat Feeding
Warden, C. H., & Fisler, J. S. (2008) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2008.03.014 · Cited by 173
Cited by
Inositols: From Established Knowledge to Novel Approaches
Dinicola, S., Unfer, V., Facchinetti, F., Soulage, C. O., Greene, N. D., Bizzarri, M., Laganà, A. S., Chan, S.-Y., Bevilacqua, A., Pkhaladze, L., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms221910575 · Cited by 154
Xu, L., Zeng, X., Liu, Y., Wu, Z., Zheng, X., & Zhang, X. (2023) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125787 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Nair, A., Morsy, M. A., & Jacob, S.
- Venue
- Drug Development Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-10-21
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 373-382
- ISSN
- 0272-4391 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2299
- OpenAlex
- W2896249550
- Cited by
- 474
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 27.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dose translation between laboratory animals and human in preclinical and clinical phases of drug development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ddr.21461
- The paper
- Nair, A., Morsy, M. A., & Jacob, S. (2018). Dose translation between laboratory animals and human in preclinical and clinical phases of drug development. Drug Development Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddr.21461
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.