Cited by 21Colorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionAI in cancer detectionArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Artificial intelligence in colonoscopy: A review on the current status

Open access
Larsen, Solveig Linnea Veen, Mori, Yuichi·2022·DEN Open

Abstract

Artificial intelligence has become an increasingly hot topic in the last several years, and it has also gained its way into the medical field. In recent years, the application of artificial intelligence in the gastroenterology field has been of increasing interest, particularly in the colonoscopy setting. Novel technologies such as deep neural networks have enabled real‐time computer‐aided polyp detection and diagnosis during colonoscopy. This might lead to increased performance of endoscopists as well as potentially reducing the costs of unnecessary polypectomies of hyperplastic polyps. Newly published prospective trials studying computer‐aided detection showed that the assistance of artificial intelligence significantly increased the detection of polyps and non‐advanced adenomas approximately by 10%, while three tandem randomized control trials proved that the adenoma miss rate was significantly reduced (e.g., 13.8% vs. 36.7% in one Japanese multicenter trial). Promising results have also been shown in prospective single‐arm trials on computer‐aided polyp diagnosis, but the evidence is insufficient to reach a conclusion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/deo2.109

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies on CADx systems for colonoscopy focused on assessing the performances of AI against the accuracy of physicians or against criteria established by gastroenterology societies for implementing the technology in a clinical setting.

    “Previous studies on cadx systems for colonoscopy focused on assessing the performances of ai against the accuracy of physicians19,20,27–30, or against the criteria established by gastroenterology societies for implementing the technology in a clinical setting31–34.”

    From Experimental evidence of effective human–AI collaboration in medical decision-making (2022) · cites this paper as [20]

    The ‘Computer-aided polyp diagnosis’ section (page unavailable) reports a comparison of CADx accuracy with observers’ diagnoses and describes a study assessing whether CADx met the NPV ≥ 90% threshold for a diagnose-and-leave strategy. It does not identify that threshold as a criterion established by a gastroenterology society or describe it as a general criterion for clinical implementation. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Larsen, S. L. V., & Mori, Y.
Affiliations
Oslo University Hospital (NO)
Corresponding author
Mori, Yuichi
Venue
DEN Open
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-03-23
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
e109-e109
ISSN
2692-4609 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220704330
Cited by
21
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • DEN Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence, colonoscopy, computer-aided detection, polyp detection, adenoma detection rate, deep neural network, hyperplastic polyps, polypectomy, endoscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review