Using developmental cognitive neuroscience to study behavioral and attentional control
Abstract
Adult cognitive neuroscience employs a wide variety of techniques to investigate a broad range of behavioral and cognitive functions. One prominent area of study is that of executive control, complemented by a smaller but growing literature exploring the developmental cognitive neuroscience of executive control. To date this approach has often compared children with specific developmental disorders, such as ADHD and ASD, with typically developing controls. Whilst these comparisons have done much to advance our understanding of the neural markers that underpin behavioral difficulties at specific time‐points in development, we contend that they should leave developmental cognitive neuroscientists wanting. Studying the neural correlates of typical changes in executive control in their own right can reveal how different neural mechanisms characteristic of the adult end‐state emerge, and it can therefore inform the adult cognitive neuroscience of executive control itself. The current review addresses the extent to which developmentalists and adult cognitive neuroscientists have tapped this common ground. Some very elegant investigations illustrate how seemingly common processes in adulthood present as separable in childhood, on the basis of their distinctive developmental trajectories. These demonstrations have implications not only for an understanding of changing behavior from infancy through childhood and adolescence into adulthood, but, moreover, for our grasp of the adult end‐state per se. We contend that, if used appropriately, developmental cognitive neuroscience could enable us to construct a more mechanistic account of executive control. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Dev Psychobiol 51: 107–118, 2009
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research on cognitive control development reports both increases and decreases in PFC activity, with patterns differing by subregion and task.
“Overall, the literature on neurodevelopmental underpinnings of cognitive control shows bidirectional, complex patterns – both increases and decreases in PFC activations that vary across subregions and tasks – that should be interpreted with caution [8,54-56].”
From Arrested development? Reconsidering dual-systems models of brain function in adolescence and disorders (2012) · cites this paper as [54]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 91 · Cited by 82
- Authors
- Astle, D. E., & Scerif, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Astle, Duncan E.
- Venue
- Developmental Psychobiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-10-30
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 107-118
- ISSN
- 0012-1630 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2302
- OpenAlex
- W1994721492
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 91
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 0.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Developmental Psychobiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (079326/Z/06/Z)
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/F025505/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Keywords
- executive function, attentional control, developmental cognitive neuroscience, typical development, neural correlates, developmental trajectories, adolescence, childhood, behavioral control
- MeSH terms
- Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Brain, Child, Developmental Disabilities, Cognition Disorders, Corpus Striatum, Electroencephalography, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Nerve Net, Neurosciences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review