Cited by 84Sexual Differentiation and DisordersNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Persistence of attention to a novel conspecific: Some developmental variables in laboratory rats

Thor, D. H., Wainwright, K. L., Holloway, W. R.·1982·Developmental Psychobiology

Abstract

Persistence of social attention by male and female laboratory rats was examined following exposure to novel conspecifics. In Experiment I we compared performance of castrate females treated with a 10‐day regimen of testosterone propionate to that of intact males and castrate female controls. Testosterone significantly prolonged mean social investigation time. Castrate females treated with a relatively high dosage of testosterone failed to differ from intact males. In Experiment II we compared neonatally andorganized female castrates with castrate male and castrate female controls. Postnatal exposure to testosterone increased sensitivity of females to exogenous testosterone in maturity as measured by persistence of social investigation. In Experiment III we compared investigation time of intact and castrated males and females at 10‐day intervals from 40 to 80 days of age. Intact males investigated novel conspecifics significantly longer than other groups, with longest investigation times at 60 and 70 days of age. In Experiment IV we compared investigation times of 30‐day, 60‐day, and 200‐day‐old males. Sixty‐day‐old males investigated significantly longer than 30‐day‐old or 200‐day‐old groups, which failed to differ from each other. The combined results demonstrate a gender and aggregated effect of testosterone on persistence of social investigation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/dev.420150102

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thor, D. H., Wainwright, K. L., & Holloway, W. R.
Corresponding author
Thor, D. H.
Venue
Developmental Psychobiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1982-01
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
1-8
ISSN
  • 0012-1630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2302
OpenAlex
W2024764185
Cited by
84
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Psychobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
social investigation, social attention, testosterone, androgenization, castration, sex differences, age effects, social behavior development, laboratory rats
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Animals, Castration, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Male, Sex Factors, Social Behavior, Testosterone, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review