An ecological approach to language development: An alternative functionalism
Abstract
I argue for a new functionalist approach to language development, an ecological approach. A realist orientation is used that locates the causes of language development neither in the child nor in the language environment but in the functioning of perceptual systems that detect language-world relationships and use them to guide attention and action. The theory requires no concept of innateness, thus avoiding problems inherent in either the innate ideas or the genes-as-causal-programs explanations of the source of structure in language. An ecological explanation of language is discussed in relation to concepts and language, language as representation, problems in early word learning, metaphor, and syntactic development. Finally, problems incurred in using the idea of innateness are summarized: History prior to the chosen beginning point is ignored, data on organism-environment mutuality are not collected, and the explanation claims no effect of learning, which cannot be tested empirically.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a strong and varied research tradition of bringing the physical approach into contact with the social approach.
“There is a strong and varied research tradition of bringing the physical approach into contact with the social approach (Dent, 1990;Hodges & Baron, 1992;Raczaszek-Leonardi, 2009;Schmidt, 2007;Szokolszky & Read, 2018).”
From Productive pluralism: The coming of age of ecological psychology. (2024) · cites this paper as Dent, 1990
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 116 · Cited by 94
- Authors
- Dent, C. H.
- Affiliations
- Miami University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dent, Cathy H.
- Venue
- Developmental Psychobiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-11
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 679-703
- ISSN
- 0012-1630 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2302
- OpenAlex
- W2049378583
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 116
- Citations by year
- 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 6.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Developmental Psychobiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Keywords
- language development, ecological approach, functionalism, innateness, perceptual systems, early word learning, metaphor, syntactic development
- MeSH terms
- Child Language, Child, Preschool, Communication, Humans, Infant, Instinct, Language Development, Semantics, Social Environment, Speech Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
