The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A shift in priority in diabetic foot care and research: 75% of foot ulcers are preventable
Open accessAbstract
Diabetic foot ulceration poses a heavy burden on the patient and the healthcare system, but prevention thereof receives little attention. For every euro spent on ulcer prevention, ten are spent on ulcer healing, and for every randomized controlled trial conducted on prevention, ten are conducted on healing. In this article, we argue that a shift in priorities is needed. For the prevention of a first foot ulcer, we need more insight into the effect of interventions and practices already applied globally in many settings. This requires systematic recording of interventions and outcomes, and well‐designed randomized controlled trials that include analysis of cost‐effectiveness. After healing of a foot ulcer, the risk of recurrence is high. For the prevention of a recurrent foot ulcer, home monitoring of foot temperature, pressure‐relieving therapeutic footwear, and certain surgical interventions prove to be effective. The median effect size found in a total of 23 studies on these interventions is large, over 60%, and further increases when patients are adherent to treatment. These interventions should be investigated for efficacy as a state‐of‐the‐art integrated foot care approach, where attempts are made to assure treatment adherence. Effect sizes of 75–80% may be expected. If such state‐of‐the‐art integrated foot care is implemented, the majority of problems with foot ulcer recurrence in diabetes can be resolved. It is therefore time to act and to set a new target in diabetic foot care. This target is to reduce foot ulcer incidence with at least 75%. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrence
Armstrong, D. G., Boulton, A. J. M., & Bus, S. A. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1615439 · Cited by 4,376
Self-citationGuidelines on the prevention of foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update)
Bus, S. A., Lavery, L. A., Monteiro‐Soares, M., Rasmussen, A., Raspovic, A., Sacco, I. C. N., van Netten, J. J., & on behalf of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (2020) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.3269 · Cited by 517
Self-citationPrevention of foot ulcers in the at‐risk patient with diabetes: a systematic review
van Netten, J. J., Price, P. E., Lavery, L. A., Monteiro‐Soares, M., Rasmussen, A., Jubiz, Y., Bus, S. A., & on behalf of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) (2016) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.2701 · Cited by 422
Self-citationGuidelines on the prevention of foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2023 update)
Bus, S. A., Sacco, I. C. N., Monteiro‐Soares, M., Raspovic, A., Paton, J., Rasmussen, A., Lavery, L. A., & van Netten, J. J. (2024) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.3651 · Cited by 279
Self-citationThe role of pressure offloading on diabetic foot ulcer healing and prevention of recurrence.
Bus, S. A. (2016) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000002686 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Bus, S. A., & van Netten, J. J.
- Venue
- Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 195-200
- ISSN
- 1520-7552 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-7560
- OpenAlex
- W2293527914
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A shift in priority in diabetic foot care and research: 75% of foot ulcers are preventable. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/dmrr.2738
- The paper
- Bus, S. A., & van Netten, J. J. (2016). A shift in priority in diabetic foot care and research: 75% of foot ulcers are preventable. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.2738
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.