Cited by 87Neurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchRobotic Locomotion and ControlMotor Control and Adaptation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Central pattern generating networks in insect locomotion

Open access
Mantziaris, Charalampos, Bockemühl, Till, Büschges, Ansgar·2020·Developmental Neurobiology

Abstract

Central pattern generators (CPGs) are neural circuits that based on their connectivity can generate rhythmic and patterned output in the absence of rhythmic external inputs. This property makes CPGs crucial elements in the generation of many kinds of rhythmic motor behaviors in insects, such as flying, walking, swimming, or crawling. Arguably representing the most diverse group of animals, insects utilize at least one of these types of locomotion during one stage of their ontogenesis. Insects have been extensively used to study the neural basis of rhythmic motor behaviors, and particularly the structure and operation of CPGs involved in locomotion. Here, we review insect locomotion with regard to flying, walking, and crawling, and we discuss the contribution of central pattern generation to these three forms of locomotion. In each case, we compare and contrast the topology and structure of the CPGs, and we point out how these factors are involved in the generation of the respective motor pattern. We focus on the importance of sensory information for establishing a functional motor output and we indicate behavior‐specific adaptations. Furthermore, we report on the mechanisms underlying coordination between different body parts. Last but not least, by reviewing the state‐of‐the‐art knowledge concerning the role of CPGs in insect locomotion, we endeavor to create a common ground, upon which future research in the field of motor control in insects can build.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/dneu.22738

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Thousands of transgenic fly lines have been generated that allow investigators to repeatedly target sparse sets of neurons for optogenetic activation and recording.

    “Additionally, thousands of transgenic fly lines have been generated that allow investigators to repeatedly target sparse sets of neurons 40 for optogenetic activation 41 and recording 42 .”

    From NeuroMechFly v2: simulating embodied sensorimotor control in adult Drosophila (2024) · cites this paper as [40]

    The Conclusions and Future Prospects section reports around 1,000 transgenic D. melanogaster lines targeting specific ventral-nerve-cord cell types for anatomical and optogenetic studies. That supports targeted use of fly lines, but not the claim of multiple thousands or specifically sparse sets of neurons. In the citing sentence, recording has a separate citation and is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 136

  1. 10.1152/jn.01271.2003 · DOI
  2. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5202-06.2007 · DOI
  3. 10.1002/cne.901720303 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.08.002 · DOI
  5. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0907-07.2007 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2010.03.015 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06694.x · DOI
  8. 10.1007/s00359-002-0279-9 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S0165-0173(98)00006-X · DOI
  10. Bässler U., 1983, Motor output of the denervated thoracic ventral nerve cord in the stick insect Carausius morosus, Journal of Experimental Biology, 105, 127, 10.1242/jeb.105.1.127 · DOI
  11. 10.1152/jn.1998.79.1.361 · DOI
  12. 10.1242/jeb.146720 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.017 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.cub.2012.07.048 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/0022-1910(94)00113-U · DOI
  16. 10.1098/rspb.1911.0077 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3155-08.2009 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0065-2806(01)28011-4 · DOI
  19. 10.1152/jn.00637.2002 · DOI
  20. Burns M. D., 1973, The control of walking in orthoptera. I. Leg movements in normal walking, Journal of Experimental Biology, 58, 45, 10.1242/jeb.58.1.45 · DOI
  21. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198523444.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1002/neu.480270405 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/S0006-8993(97)01370-X · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.06.028 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/S0065-2806(07)34004-6 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/BF00192718 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03312.x · DOI
  28. Büschges A., 1991, Adaptive modifications in the flight system of the locust after the removal of wing proprioceptors, Journal of Experimental Biology, 157, 313, 10.1242/jeb.157.1.313 · DOI
  29. 10.1002/neu.480230106 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/neu.480230105 · DOI
  31. Büschges A., 1995, Rhythmic patterns in the thoracic nerve cord of the stick insect induced by pilocarpine, The Journal of Experimental Biology, 198, 435, 10.1242/jeb.198.2.435 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.029 · DOI
  33. 10.1152/jn.1999.81.2.959 · DOI
  34. 10.1073/pnas.2535546100 · DOI
  35. 10.1002/neu.1042 · DOI
  36. 10.1002/neu.480220204 · DOI
  37. 10.1186/s13064-018-0103-z · DOI
  38. 10.1016/0022-1910(95)00032-P · DOI
  39. 10.1242/jeb.112805 · DOI
  40. 10.1007/s00422-011-0446-6 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/s10827-010-0300-1 · DOI
  42. 10.1242/bio.018705 · DOI
  43. 10.1242/jeb.110.1.35 · DOI
  44. 10.1242/jeb.121.1.115 · DOI
  45. 10.1007/BF00605017 · DOI
  46. 10.1152/jn.2001.85.1.341 · DOI
  47. Fischer H., 2002, The locust tegula: Kinematic parameters and activity pattern during the wing stroke, Journal of Experimental Biology, 205, 1531, 10.1242/jeb.205.11.1531 · DOI
  48. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4749-05.2006 · DOI
  49. Frye M. A., 2001, Effects of stretch receptor ablation on the optomotor control of lift in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta, The Journal of Experimental Biology, 204, 3683, 10.1242/jeb.204.21.3683 · DOI
  50. Fuchs E., 2011, Intersegmental coordination of cockroach locomotion: Adaptive control of centrally coupled pattern generator circuits, Frontiers in Neural Circuits, 4, 125
  51. Full R. J., 1991, Mechanics of a rapid running insect: Two‐, four‐ and six‐legged locomotion, Journal of Experimental Biology, 156, 215, 10.1242/jeb.156.1.215 · DOI
  52. 10.7554/eLife.13253 · DOI
  53. 10.1038/193498a0 · DOI
  54. 10.3389/fncom.2013.00024 · DOI
  55. 10.1371/journal.pone.0202822 · DOI
  56. 10.1007/BF00693548 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Graham D., 1985, Influence of coxa‐thorax joint receptors on retractor motor output during walking in Carausius morosus, Journal of Experimental Biology, 114, 131, 10.1242/jeb.114.1.131 · DOI
  58. 10.1104/pp.55.2.247 · DOI
  59. 10.1007/BF00235671 · DOI
  60. 10.1038/srep30806 · DOI
  61. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0222-12.2012 · DOI
  62. 10.1152/jn.1999.81.4.1856 · DOI
  63. 10.1002/9781118873397.ch2 · DOI
  64. 10.1007/BF00603663 · DOI
  65. 10.1007/BF00611589 · DOI
  66. 10.1016/j.mcn.2007.04.001 · DOI
  67. Hughes G. M., 1952, The co‐ordination of insect movements. I. The walking movements of insects, Journal of Experimental Biology, 29, 267, 10.1242/jeb.29.2.267 · DOI
  68. 10.1371/journal.pone.0136660 · DOI
  69. 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011592 · DOI
  70. 10.1152/jn.1996.76.5.3178 · DOI
  71. 10.1007/s10158-002-0019-4 · DOI
  72. 10.1146/annurev-neuro-072116-031558 · DOI
  73. 10.3389/fncir.2016.00112 · DOI
  74. 10.2174/1381612822666161208120835 · DOI
  75. 10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.026 · DOI
  76. 10.1152/jn.00493.2005 · DOI
  77. 10.1152/jn.00321.2017 · DOI
  78. 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00581-4 · DOI
  79. Mendes C. S., 2013, Quantification of gait parameters in freely walking wild type and sensory deprived Drosophila melanogaster, eLife, 2, e00231, 10.7554/eLife.00231 · DOI · Paper page
  80. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-04-01109.2003 · DOI
  81. Metallo C., 2015, Orientation‐dependent changes in single motor neuron activity during adaptive soft‐bodied locomotion, BBE, 85, 47
  82. Minegishi R., 2019, Living Machines, 334
  83. 10.1007/BF00610671 · DOI
  84. 10.1242/jeb.173856 · DOI
  85. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2019.02.003 · DOI
  86. Neumann L., 1985, Insect locomotion, 149
  87. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524052.001.0001 · DOI
  88. 10.1007/BF00355656 · DOI
  89. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0089-09.2009 · DOI
  90. Pearson K. G., 1972, Central programming and reflex control of walking in the cockroach, Journal of Experimental Biology, 56, 173, 10.1242/jeb.56.1.173 · DOI
  91. 10.1007/978-1-4615-9492-5_10 · DOI
  92. Pearson K. G., 1970, Discharge patterns of coxal levator and depressor motoneurones of the cockroach, Periplaneta americana, The Journal of Experimental Biology, 52, 139, 10.1242/jeb.52.1.139 · DOI
  93. Pearson K. G., 1990, Influence of input from the forewing stretch receptors on motoneurones in flying locusts, Journal of Experimental Biology, 151, 317, 10.1242/jeb.151.1.317 · DOI
  94. 10.1152/jn.1983.49.5.1168 · DOI
  95. 10.1007/BF00214661 · DOI
  96. Pearson K. G., 1988, Connections of hindwing tegulae with flight neurones in the locust, Locusta migratoria, Journal of Experimental Biology, 135, 381, 10.1242/jeb.135.1.381 · DOI
  97. Pflüger H. J., 2004, Report of the 93rd Dahlem workshop on microcircuits: The interface between neurons and global brain function
  98. 10.1152/physiol.00002.2011 · DOI
  99. 10.1152/jn.00731.2015 · DOI
  100. 10.1016/0006-8993(91)90477-D · DOI
  101. 10.1152/jn.1991.66.5.1522 · DOI
  102. Reye D. N., 1987, Projections of the wing stretch receptors to central flight neurons in the locust, Journal of Neuroscience, 7, 2476
  103. 10.1007/BF01342705 · DOI
  104. 10.1371/journal.pone.0062899 · DOI
  105. 10.1016/j.conb.2008.01.001 · DOI
  106. 10.1002/cne.902150104 · DOI
  107. 10.1152/jn.1985.53.1.110 · DOI
  108. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-10-03929.1988 · DOI
  109. 10.1007/BF00225805 · DOI
  110. 10.1146/annurev.ento.50.071803.130404 · DOI · Paper page
  111. 10.1007/BF00604052 · DOI
  112. 10.1152/jn.1993.69.5.1583 · DOI · Paper page
  113. 10.1152/jn.1994.72.6.2771 · DOI
  114. 10.1007/BF00612994 · DOI
  115. 10.1242/jeb.023507 · DOI
  116. 10.1007/s003590050030 · DOI
  117. 10.1007/BF00606089 · DOI
  118. 10.1038/416174a · DOI
  119. Szczecinski N. S. &Quinn R. D.(2017).MantisBot changes stepping speed by entraining CPGs to positive velocity feedback. InM.Mangan M.Cutkosky A.Mura P.Verschure T.Prescott &N.Lepora(Eds.) Biomimetic and Biohybrid Systems. Living Machines (2017). Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol.10384(pp.440–452).Cham:Springer. · DOI
  120. 10.1098/rsif.2011.0339 · DOI
  121. 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32834cd78e · DOI
  122. 10.2307/25066590 · DOI
  123. 10.1016/j.cub.2016.06.070 · DOI · Paper page
  124. 10.1242/jeb.025783 · DOI
  125. 10.1111/brv.12073 · DOI
  126. 10.1007/BF00612701 · DOI
  127. 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2010.05.018 · DOI
  128. 10.1007/BF00695406 · DOI
  129. Wendler G., 1966, The co‐ordination of walking movements in arthropods, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, 20, 229
  130. Wilson D. M., 1961, The central nervous control of flight in a locust, Journal of Experimental Biology, 38, 471, 10.1242/jeb.38.2.471 · DOI
  131. 10.1146/annurev.en.11.010166.000535 · DOI
  132. 10.1152/jn.1997.78.3.1276 · DOI
  133. 10.1152/jn.1988.59.6.1831 · DOI
  134. 10.1007/BF00613800 · DOI
  135. 10.1242/jeb.078139 · DOI · Paper page
  136. 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.06.031 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mantziaris, C., Bockemühl, T., & Büschges, A.
Affiliations
University of Cologne (DE)
Corresponding author
Büschges, Ansgar
Venue
Developmental Neurobiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-01
Volume
80
Issue
1-2
Pages
16-30
ISSN
  • 1932-8451 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-846X
OpenAlex
W3010437603
Cited by
87
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Neurobiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Bu857, DFG‐RTG 1960)
  • Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotic Locomotion and Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
central pattern generator, insect locomotion, insect flight, walking, crawling, swimming, sensory feedback, interlimb coordination, motor control, ontogeny
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Insecta, Locomotion, Central Pattern Generators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review