The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Central pattern generating networks in insect locomotion
Open accessAbstract
Central pattern generators (CPGs) are neural circuits that based on their connectivity can generate rhythmic and patterned output in the absence of rhythmic external inputs. This property makes CPGs crucial elements in the generation of many kinds of rhythmic motor behaviors in insects, such as flying, walking, swimming, or crawling. Arguably representing the most diverse group of animals, insects utilize at least one of these types of locomotion during one stage of their ontogenesis. Insects have been extensively used to study the neural basis of rhythmic motor behaviors, and particularly the structure and operation of CPGs involved in locomotion. Here, we review insect locomotion with regard to flying, walking, and crawling, and we discuss the contribution of central pattern generation to these three forms of locomotion. In each case, we compare and contrast the topology and structure of the CPGs, and we point out how these factors are involved in the generation of the respective motor pattern. We focus on the importance of sensory information for establishing a functional motor output and we indicate behavior‐specific adaptations. Furthermore, we report on the mechanisms underlying coordination between different body parts. Last but not least, by reviewing the state‐of‐the‐art knowledge concerning the role of CPGs in insect locomotion, we endeavor to create a common ground, upon which future research in the field of motor control in insects can build.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Thousands of transgenic fly lines have been generated that allow investigators to repeatedly target sparse sets of neurons for optogenetic activation and recording.
“Additionally, thousands of transgenic fly lines have been generated that allow investigators to repeatedly target sparse sets of neurons 40 for optogenetic activation 41 and recording 42 .”
From NeuroMechFly v2: simulating embodied sensorimotor control in adult Drosophila (2024) · cites this paper as [40]
The Conclusions and Future Prospects section reports around 1,000 transgenic D. melanogaster lines targeting specific ventral-nerve-cord cell types for anatomical and optogenetic studies. That supports targeted use of fly lines, but not the claim of multiple thousands or specifically sparse sets of neurons. In the citing sentence, recording has a separate citation and is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bidaye, S. S., Bockemühl, T., & Büschges, A. (2018) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00658.2017 · Cited by 152 · cited 3×
“…also help us unravel the neural basis of motor flexibility, that is, the known task-dependent flexibility in locomotor pattern generation (e.g., Bidaye et al., 2018; Ritzmann & Büschges, 2007), best exemplified by the modulation in leg kinematics of a walking animal, when changing heading,…”
BackgroundInfluentialDevelopment of central pattern generating circuits
Marder, E., & Rehm, K. J. (2005) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2005.01.011 · Cited by 116
Radnikow, G., & Bässler, U. (1991) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.157.1.87 · Cited by 61
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 136
- 10.1152/jn.01271.2003 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5202-06.2007 · DOI
- 10.1002/cne.901720303 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.08.002 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0907-07.2007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2010.03.015 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06694.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s00359-002-0279-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0165-0173(98)00006-X · DOI
- Bässler U., 1983, Motor output of the denervated thoracic ventral nerve cord in the stick insect Carausius morosus, Journal of Experimental Biology, 105, 127, 10.1242/jeb.105.1.127 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.1998.79.1.361 · DOI
- 10.1242/jeb.146720 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.017 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2012.07.048 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-1910(94)00113-U · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.1911.0077 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3155-08.2009 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0065-2806(01)28011-4 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.00637.2002 · DOI
- Burns M. D., 1973, The control of walking in orthoptera. I. Leg movements in normal walking, Journal of Experimental Biology, 58, 45, 10.1242/jeb.58.1.45 · DOI
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198523444.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/neu.480270405 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0006-8993(97)01370-X · DOI
- 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.06.028 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0065-2806(07)34004-6 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00192718 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03312.x · DOI
- Büschges A., 1991, Adaptive modifications in the flight system of the locust after the removal of wing proprioceptors, Journal of Experimental Biology, 157, 313, 10.1242/jeb.157.1.313 · DOI
- 10.1002/neu.480230106 · DOI
- 10.1002/neu.480230105 · DOI
- Büschges A., 1995, Rhythmic patterns in the thoracic nerve cord of the stick insect induced by pilocarpine, The Journal of Experimental Biology, 198, 435, 10.1242/jeb.198.2.435 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.029 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.1999.81.2.959 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2535546100 · DOI
- 10.1002/neu.1042 · DOI
- 10.1002/neu.480220204 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13064-018-0103-z · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-1910(95)00032-P · DOI
- 10.1242/jeb.112805 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00422-011-0446-6 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10827-010-0300-1 · DOI
- 10.1242/bio.018705 · DOI
- 10.1242/jeb.110.1.35 · DOI
- 10.1242/jeb.121.1.115 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00605017 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.2001.85.1.341 · DOI
- Fischer H., 2002, The locust tegula: Kinematic parameters and activity pattern during the wing stroke, Journal of Experimental Biology, 205, 1531, 10.1242/jeb.205.11.1531 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4749-05.2006 · DOI
- Frye M. A., 2001, Effects of stretch receptor ablation on the optomotor control of lift in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta, The Journal of Experimental Biology, 204, 3683, 10.1242/jeb.204.21.3683 · DOI
- Fuchs E., 2011, Intersegmental coordination of cockroach locomotion: Adaptive control of centrally coupled pattern generator circuits, Frontiers in Neural Circuits, 4, 125
- Full R. J., 1991, Mechanics of a rapid running insect: Two‐, four‐ and six‐legged locomotion, Journal of Experimental Biology, 156, 215, 10.1242/jeb.156.1.215 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.13253 · DOI
- 10.1038/193498a0 · DOI
- 10.3389/fncom.2013.00024 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0202822 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00693548 · DOI · Paper page
- Graham D., 1985, Influence of coxa‐thorax joint receptors on retractor motor output during walking in Carausius morosus, Journal of Experimental Biology, 114, 131, 10.1242/jeb.114.1.131 · DOI
- 10.1104/pp.55.2.247 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00235671 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep30806 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0222-12.2012 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.1999.81.4.1856 · DOI
- 10.1002/9781118873397.ch2 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00603663 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00611589 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mcn.2007.04.001 · DOI
- Hughes G. M., 1952, The co‐ordination of insect movements. I. The walking movements of insects, Journal of Experimental Biology, 29, 267, 10.1242/jeb.29.2.267 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0136660 · DOI
- 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011592 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.1996.76.5.3178 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10158-002-0019-4 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-neuro-072116-031558 · DOI
- 10.3389/fncir.2016.00112 · DOI
- 10.2174/1381612822666161208120835 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.026 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.00493.2005 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.00321.2017 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00581-4 · DOI
- Mendes C. S., 2013, Quantification of gait parameters in freely walking wild type and sensory deprived Drosophila melanogaster, eLife, 2, e00231, 10.7554/eLife.00231 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-04-01109.2003 · DOI
- Metallo C., 2015, Orientation‐dependent changes in single motor neuron activity during adaptive soft‐bodied locomotion, BBE, 85, 47
- Minegishi R., 2019, Living Machines, 334
- 10.1007/BF00610671 · DOI
- 10.1242/jeb.173856 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2019.02.003 · DOI
- Neumann L., 1985, Insect locomotion, 149
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524052.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00355656 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0089-09.2009 · DOI
- Pearson K. G., 1972, Central programming and reflex control of walking in the cockroach, Journal of Experimental Biology, 56, 173, 10.1242/jeb.56.1.173 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4615-9492-5_10 · DOI
- Pearson K. G., 1970, Discharge patterns of coxal levator and depressor motoneurones of the cockroach, Periplaneta americana, The Journal of Experimental Biology, 52, 139, 10.1242/jeb.52.1.139 · DOI
- Pearson K. G., 1990, Influence of input from the forewing stretch receptors on motoneurones in flying locusts, Journal of Experimental Biology, 151, 317, 10.1242/jeb.151.1.317 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.1983.49.5.1168 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00214661 · DOI
- Pearson K. G., 1988, Connections of hindwing tegulae with flight neurones in the locust, Locusta migratoria, Journal of Experimental Biology, 135, 381, 10.1242/jeb.135.1.381 · DOI
- Pflüger H. J., 2004, Report of the 93rd Dahlem workshop on microcircuits: The interface between neurons and global brain function
- 10.1152/physiol.00002.2011 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.00731.2015 · DOI
- 10.1016/0006-8993(91)90477-D · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.1991.66.5.1522 · DOI
- Reye D. N., 1987, Projections of the wing stretch receptors to central flight neurons in the locust, Journal of Neuroscience, 7, 2476
- 10.1007/BF01342705 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0062899 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.conb.2008.01.001 · DOI
- 10.1002/cne.902150104 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.1985.53.1.110 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-10-03929.1988 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00225805 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.ento.50.071803.130404 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF00604052 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.1993.69.5.1583 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1152/jn.1994.72.6.2771 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00612994 · DOI
- 10.1242/jeb.023507 · DOI
- 10.1007/s003590050030 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00606089 · DOI
- 10.1038/416174a · DOI
- Szczecinski N. S. &Quinn R. D.(2017).MantisBot changes stepping speed by entraining CPGs to positive velocity feedback. InM.Mangan M.Cutkosky A.Mura P.Verschure T.Prescott &N.Lepora(Eds.) Biomimetic and Biohybrid Systems. Living Machines (2017). Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol.10384(pp.440–452).Cham:Springer. · DOI
- 10.1098/rsif.2011.0339 · DOI
- 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32834cd78e · DOI
- 10.2307/25066590 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2016.06.070 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1242/jeb.025783 · DOI
- 10.1111/brv.12073 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00612701 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2010.05.018 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00695406 · DOI
- Wendler G., 1966, The co‐ordination of walking movements in arthropods, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, 20, 229
- Wilson D. M., 1961, The central nervous control of flight in a locust, Journal of Experimental Biology, 38, 471, 10.1242/jeb.38.2.471 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.en.11.010166.000535 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.1997.78.3.1276 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.1988.59.6.1831 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00613800 · DOI
- 10.1242/jeb.078139 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.06.031 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
NeuroMechFly, a neuromechanical model of adult Drosophila melanogaster
Lobato-Rios, V., Ramalingasetty, S. T., Özdil, P. G., Arreguit, J., Ijspeert, A. J., & Ramdya, P. (2022) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-022-01466-7 · Cited by 88
Ijspeert, A. J., & Daley, M. A. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.245784 · Cited by 79
NeuroMechFly v2: simulating embodied sensorimotor control in adult Drosophila
Wang-Chen, S., Stimpfling, V. A., Lam, T. K. C., Özdil, P. G., Genoud, L., Hurtak, F., & Ramdya, P. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02497-y · Cited by 43
“CPGs are neural circuits that generate rhythmic outputs without receiving rhythmic input 40 .”
Metadata
- Authors
- Mantziaris, C., Bockemühl, T., & Büschges, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Cologne (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Büschges, Ansgar
- Venue
- Developmental Neurobiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 16-30
- ISSN
- 1932-8451 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-846X
- OpenAlex
- W3010437603
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6
- FWCI
- 1.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Developmental Neurobiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Bu857, DFG‐RTG 1960)
- Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotic Locomotion and Control
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- central pattern generator, insect locomotion, insect flight, walking, crawling, swimming, sensory feedback, interlimb coordination, motor control, ontogeny
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Behavior, Animal, Insecta, Locomotion, Central Pattern Generators
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review