Cited by 9Doping in SportsForensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisPharmacological Effects and Assays

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identification of the designer steroid Androsta‐3,5‐diene‐7,17‐dione in a dietary supplement

Abstract

A liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry (LC–MS) screen for known anabolic‐androgenic steroids in a dietary supplement product marketed for “performance enhancement” detected an unknown compound having steroid‐like spectral characteristics. The compound was isolated using high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC–UV) coupled with an analytical scale fraction collector. After the compound was isolated, it was then characterized using gas chromatography with simultaneous Fourier Transform infrared detection and mass spectrometry (GC–FT–IR–MS), liquid chromatography–high resolution accurate mass–mass spectrometry (LC–HRAM–MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The steroid had an accurate mass of m/z 285.1847 (error−0.57 ppm) for the protonated species [M + H]+, corresponding to a molecular formula of C 19 H 24 O 2. Based on the GC–FT–IR–MS data, NMR data, and accurate mass, the compound was identified as androsta‐3,5‐diene‐7,17‐dione. Although this is not the first reported identification of this designer steroid in a dietary supplement, the data provided adds information for identification of this compound not previously reported. This compound was subsequently detected in another dietary supplement product, which contained three additional active ingredients.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/dta.2589

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Agbenyefia P, 2014, Cholestatic jaundice with the use of Methylstenbolone and Dymethazine, designer steroids found in super DMZ Rx 2.0 “nutritional supplement”: a case report, J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep, 2, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 9

Metadata

Authors
Lorenz, L. M., Toomey, V. M., Lanzarotta, A. C., Flurer, R. A., & Falconer, T. M.
Affiliations
United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
Corresponding author
Lorenz, Lisa M.
Venue
Drug Testing and Analysis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-05-03
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
1109-1115
ISSN
  • 1942-7603 (ISSN-L)
  • 1942-7611
OpenAlex
W2924990831
Cited by
9
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug Testing and Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Doping in Sports
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Pharmacological Effects and Assays
Keywords
designer steroids, anabolic steroids, dietary supplements, steroid identification, molecular formula determination, NMR characterization
MeSH terms
Androstadienes, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Designer Drugs, Substance Abuse Detection, Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review