The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cathinone derivatives: A review of their chemistry, pharmacology and toxicology
Abstract
The purpose of this review is to evaluate what is currently known about the pharmacology of cathinone derivatives. Cathinone is the principal active constituent of khat responsible for the stimulant effects that have led khat to be known as a ‘natural amphetamine’. Synthetic derivatives have been abused for their amphetamine‐like stimulant effects, most notably methylone, methcathinone (ephedrone), and 4‐methlymethcathinone (mephedrone). To date, cathinone and methcathinone have been studied most, demonstrating amphetamine‐like effects in a range of in vitro and in vivo investigations, albeit less potently than amphetamines. In humans, cathinone derivatives are usually administered orally, and in some cases by insufflation. Methcathinone has a longer history of abuse, being produced from readily available starting materials, and administered by injection. Mephedrone has become the best publicised cathinone derivative, amid considerable media and public concern about its legal status, its ready availability, and reports of serious toxicity and deaths following its use. As a consequence, there has been a clampdown on cathinone derivatives, dramatically changing their legal status in a number of countries. However, little objective evidence‐based comparative experiments have been conducted to date between these compounds and their related amphetamines in order to make clear risk judgements. Such assessments have largely been predictive in nature, based on their structural similarity to amphetamines. It can be assumed that, despite their illegal status, cathinone‐related compounds will continue to be prevalent drugs of abuse for the foreseeable future. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McCann, U. D., Wong, D. F., Yokoi, F., Villemagne, V., Dannals, R. F., & Ricaurte, G. A. (1998) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.18-20-08417.1998 · Cited by 602
Ellison, G. (2002) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0924-977x(02)00020-2 · Cited by 92
Cited by
The clinical challenges of synthetic cathinones
Schifano, F., Napoletano, F., Arillotta, D., Zangani, C., Gilgar, L., Guirguis, A., Corkery, J. M., & Vento, A. (2020) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bcp.14132 · Cited by 73
Emergence and properties of spice and bath salts: a medicinal chemistry perspective
Lewin, A. H., Seltzman, H. H., Carroll, F. I., Mascarella, S. W., & Reddy, P. A. (2014) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2013.09.026 · Cited by 72
Widmann, M., Apondi, B., Musau, A., Warsame, A. H., Isse, M., Mutiso, V., Veltrup, C., Ndetei, D., & Odenwald, M. (2017) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-017-1368-y · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Kelly, J. P.
- Venue
- Drug Testing and Analysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 7-8
- Pages
- 439-453
- ISSN
- 1942-7603 (ISSN-L)
- 1942-7611
- OpenAlex
- W1977213360
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 36.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.