The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolutionary conservation and divergence of the segmentation process in arthropods
Open accessAbstract
A fundamental characteristic of the arthropod body plan is its organization in metameric units along the anterior–posterior axis. The segmental organization is laid down during early embryogenesis. Our view on arthropod segmentation is still strongly influenced by the huge amount of data available from the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster (the Drosophila paradigm). However, the simultaneous formation of the segments in Drosophila is a derived mode of segmentation. Successive terminal addition of segments from a posteriorly localized presegmental zone is the ancestral mode of arthropod segmentation. This review focuses on the evolutionary conservation and divergence of the genetic mechanisms of segmentation within arthropods. The more downstream levels of the segmentation gene network (e.g., segment polarity genes) appear to be more conserved than the more upstream levels (gap genes, Notch/Delta signaling). Surprisingly, the basally branched arthropod groups also show similarities to mechanisms used in vertebrate somitogenesis. Furthermore, it has become clear that the activation of pair rule gene orthologs is a key step in the segmentation of all arthropods. Important findings of conserved and diverged aspects of segmentation from the last few years now allow us to draw an evolutionary scenario on how the mechanisms of segmentation could have evolved and led to the present mechanisms seen in various insect groups including dipterans like Drosophila. Developmental Dynamics 236:1379–1391, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals
Aguinaldo, A. M. A., Turbeville, J. M., Linford, L. S., Rivera, M. C., Garey, J. R., Raff, R. A., & Lake, J. A. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387489a0 · Cited by 1,609
A Complex Oscillating Network of Signaling Genes Underlies the Mouse Segmentation Clock
Dequéant, M.-L., Glynn, E., Gaudenz, K., Wahl, M., Chen, J., Mushegian, A., & Pourquié, O. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1133141 · Cited by 460
Cox, R. T., Kirkpatrick, C., & Peifer, M. (1996) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.134.1.133 · Cited by 300 · cited 2×
“However, armadillo is also involved in cell adhesion (Cox et al., 1996); one, therefore, has to be very”
Background
Cited by
Choe, C. P., & Brown, S. J. (2009) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.10.037 · Cited by 46
The mouth, the anus, and the blastopore—open questions about questionable openings
Hejnol, A., & Martindale, M. Q. (2009) · Animal Evolution · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199549429.003.0004 · Cited by 37
Genomic, phylogenetic, and cell biological insights into metazoan origins
Nichols, S. A., Dayel, M. J., & King, N. (2009) · Animal Evolution · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199549429.003.0003 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Damen, W. G. M.
- Venue
- Developmental Dynamics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-04-17
- Volume
- 236
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1379-1391
- ISSN
- 1058-8388 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0177
- OpenAlex
- W2053850816
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolutionary conservation and divergence of the segmentation process in arthropods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/dvdy.21157
- The paper
- Damen, W. G. M. (2007). Evolutionary conservation and divergence of the segmentation process in arthropods. Developmental Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.21157
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.