Cited by 84Autophagy in Disease and TherapyDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationCell Adhesion Molecules Research

Developmental expression of LC3α and β: Absence of fibronectin or autophagy phenotype in LC3β knockout mice

Cann, Gordon M., Guignabert, Christophe, Ying, Lihua, Deshpande, Niru, Bekker, Janine M., Wang, Lingli, Zhou, Bin, Rabinovitch, Marlene·2008·Developmental Dynamics

Abstract

Murine light chain 3 (LC3) exists as two isoforms, LC3alpha and beta: LC3beta is an RNA-binding protein that enhances fibronectin (FN) mRNA translation, and is also a marker of autophagy. We report embryonic expression patterns for LC3alpha and LC3beta, with some overlap but notable differences in the brain, and in tissues of non-neuronal origin. LC3beta knockout (-/-) mice develop normally without a compensatory increase in LC3alpha. LC3beta-/- embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) exhibit reduced FN synthesis but maintain wild type (WT) levels of FN protein. No significant changes in proteins associated with FN turnover, i.e., caveolin-1, LRP-1, or matrix metalloproteinases were identified. Autophagosomes form in amino acid-starved LC3beta-/-MEFs, and Caesarean-delivered pups survive as long as WT pups without an increase in LC3-related proteins linked to autophagy. These results suggest novel compensatory mechanisms for loss of LC3beta, ensuring proper FN accumulation and autophagy during fetal and neonatal life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/dvdy.21392

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 84

Authors
Cann, G. M., Guignabert, C., Ying, L., Deshpande, N., Bekker, J. M., Wang, L., Zhou, B., & Rabinovitch, M.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Rabinovitch, Marlene
Venue
Developmental Dynamics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-12-10
Volume
237
Issue
1
Pages
187-195
ISSN
  • 1058-8388 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0177
OpenAlex
W2092070727
Cited by
84
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Dynamics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hl074186-17)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01-HL074186)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Cell Adhesion Molecules Research
Keywords
fibronectin, autophagy, embryonic development, knockout mice, embryonic fibroblasts, caveolin-1, LRP1, matrix metalloproteinases, autophagosomes, amino acid starvation, compensatory mechanisms, fetal and neonatal development, brain
MeSH terms
Animals, Autophagy, Cells, Cultured, Fibroblasts, Fibronectins, Humans, Mesoderm, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Nervous System, Phenotype, Blotting, Western, Survival Analysis, In Situ Hybridization, Mice, Knockout, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Protein Isoforms, Matrix Metalloproteinases, Caveolin 1, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review