The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Poly peak parser: Method and software for identification of unknown indels using sanger sequencing of polymerase chain reaction products
Open accessAbstract
Background: Genome editing techniques, including ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR, have created a need to rapidly screen many F1 individuals to identify carriers of indels and determine the sequences of the mutations. Current techniques require multiple clones of the targeted region to be sequenced for each individual, which is inefficient when many individuals must be analyzed. Direct Sanger sequencing of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplified region surrounding the target site is efficient, but Sanger sequencing genomes heterozygous for an indel results in a string of “double peaks” due to the mismatched region. Results: To facilitate indel identification, we developed an online tool called Poly Peak Parser (available at http://yost.genetics.utah.edu/software.php) that is able to separate chromatogram data containing ambiguous base calls into wild‐type and mutant allele sequences. This tool allows the nature of the indel to be determined from a single sequencing run per individual performed directly on a PCR product spanning the targeted site, without cloning. Conclusions: The method and algorithm described here facilitate rapid identification and sequence characterization of heterozygous mutant carriers generated by genome editing. Although designed for screening F1 individuals, this tool can also be used to identify heterozygous indels in many contexts. Developmental Dynamics 243:1632–1636, 2014. © 2014 The Authors. Developmental Dynamics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Anatomists
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system
Hwang, W. Y., Fu, Y., Reyon, D., Maeder, M. L., Tsai, S. Q., Sander, J. D., Peterson, R. T., Yeh, J.-R. J., & Joung, J. K. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2501 · Cited by 2,937
TALENs: A widely applicable technology for targeted genome editing
Joung, J. K., & Sander, J. D. (2013) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3486 · Cited by 1,650 · cited 3×
“…including Zinc-finger Nucleases (ZFN) (Bibikova et al., 2002; Gupta et al., 2012), Transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALEN) (Joung and Sander, 2013; Miller et al., 2011; Zu et al., 2013) and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) (Hwang et al.,…”
BackgroundTargeted Chromosomal Cleavage and Mutagenesis in Drosophila Using Zinc-Finger Nucleases
Bibikova, M., Golic, M., Golic, K. G., & Carroll, D. (2002) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/161.3.1169 · Cited by 860
Cited by
Easy quantitative assessment of genome editing by sequence trace decomposition
Brinkman, E. K., Chen, T., Amendola, M., & van Steensel, B. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku936 · Cited by 2,390
Kosicki, M., Tomberg, K., & Bradley, A. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4192 · Cited by 1,883
Efficient introduction of specific homozygous and heterozygous mutations using CRISPR/Cas9
Paquet, D., Kwart, D., Chen, A., Sproul, A., Jacob, S., Teo, S., Olsen, K. M., Gregg, A., Noggle, S., & Tessier-Lavigne, M. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17664 · Cited by 951
EditR: A Method to Quantify Base Editing from Sanger Sequencing
Kluesner, M. G., Nedveck, D. A., Lahr, W. S., Garbe, J. R., Abrahante, J. E., Webber, B. R., & Moriarity, B. S. (2018) · The CRISPR Journal · doi:10.1089/crispr.2018.0014 · Cited by 565
Schiml, S., Fauser, F., & Puchta, H. (2014) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.12704 · Cited by 342
Metadata
- Authors
- Hill, J. T., Demarest, B. L., Bisgrove, B. W., Su, Y., Smith, M., & Yost, H. J.
- Venue
- Developmental Dynamics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-09-30
- Volume
- 243
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1632-1636
- ISSN
- 1058-8388 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0177
- OpenAlex
- W1508404210
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Poly peak parser: Method and software for identification of unknown indels using sanger sequencing of polymerase chain reaction products. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/dvdy.24183
- The paper
- Hill, J. T., Demarest, B. L., Bisgrove, B. W., Su, Y., Smith, M., & Yost, H. J. (2014). Poly peak parser: Method and software for identification of unknown indels using sanger sequencing of polymerase chain reaction products. Developmental Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.24183
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.