Repeated ecological and life cycle transitions make salamanders an ideal model for evolution and development
Open accessAbstract
Observations on the ontogeny and diversity of salamanders provided some of the earliest evidence that shifts in developmental trajectories have made a substantial contribution to the evolution of animal forms. Since the dawn of evo‐devo there have been major advances in understanding developmental mechanisms, phylogenetic relationships, evolutionary models, and an appreciation for the impact of ecology on patterns of development (eco‐evo‐devo). Molecular phylogenetic analyses have converged on strong support for the majority of branches in the Salamander Tree of Life, which includes 764 described species. Ancestral reconstructions reveal repeated transitions between life cycle modes and ecologies. The salamander fossil record is scant, but key Mesozoic species support the antiquity of life cycle transitions in some families. Colonization of diverse habitats has promoted phenotypic diversification and sometimes convergence when similar environments have been independently invaded. However, unrelated lineages may follow different developmental pathways to arrive at convergent phenotypes. This article summarizes ecological and endocrine‐based causes of life cycle transitions in salamanders, as well as consequences to body size, genome size, and skeletal structure. Salamanders offer a rich source of comparisons for understanding how the evolution of developmental patterns has led to phenotypic diversification following shifts to new adaptive zones.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Greater environmental stability is likely the main explanation for the latitudinal pattern, resulting in less pressure for energetically expensive morphological change across seasons.
“Although many environmental attributes vary with latitude, greater environmental stability is likely the main explanation here, resulting in less pressure for energetically expensive morphological change across the seasons”
From The neoteny goldilocks zone: The evolution of neoteny in <i>Ambystoma</i> (2024) · cites this paper as Bonett et al., 2022
In most metamorphic amphibians, development is dependent on changing seasons, triggered by changing temperature, day length or rainfall.
“In most metamorphic amphibians, including many mole salamanders, development is dependent on the changing seasons, triggered by changing temperature, day length or rainfall”
From The neoteny goldilocks zone: The evolution of neoteny in <i>Ambystoma</i> (2024) · cites this paper as Bonett et al., 2022
Cites
The origins of genome complexity
Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1089370 · Cited by 1,698 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The neoteny goldilocks zone: The evolution of neoteny in <i>Ambystoma</i>
Lyons, T. A., & Arbuckle, K. (2024) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.11240 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Although many environmental attributes vary with latitude, greater environmental stability is likely the main explanation here, resulting in less pressure for energetically expensive morphological change across the seasons (Bonett et al., 2022 ; Teeri & Stowe, 1976 ).”
BackgroundInfluential
- Authors
- Bonett, R. M., Ledbetter, N. M., Hess, A. J., Herrboldt, M. A., & Denoël, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Tulsa (US)
- University of Liège (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Bonett, Ronald M.
- Venue
- Developmental Dynamics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-06-02
- Volume
- 251
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 957-972
- ISSN
- 1058-8388 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0177
- OpenAlex
- W3162458313
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Developmental Dynamics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Directorate for Biological Sciences (DEB 1050322, DEB 1840987)
- Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS (J.0008.13, J.0112.16, T.0070.19)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Keywords
- salamanders, life cycle transitions, evolutionary developmental biology, eco-evo-devo, developmental trajectories, ancestral state reconstruction, habitat colonization, phenotypic convergence, body size, genome size, skeleton, adaptive zones, phenotypic diversification
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biological Evolution, Fossils, Life Cycle Stages, Phylogeny, Caudata, Urodela
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review