Cited by 38Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationAmphibian and Reptile BiologyEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Repeated ecological and life cycle transitions make salamanders an ideal model for evolution and development

Open access
Bonett, Ronald M., Ledbetter, Nicholus M., Hess, Alexander J., Herrboldt, Madison A., Denoël, Mathieu·2022·Developmental Dynamics

Abstract

Observations on the ontogeny and diversity of salamanders provided some of the earliest evidence that shifts in developmental trajectories have made a substantial contribution to the evolution of animal forms. Since the dawn of evo‐devo there have been major advances in understanding developmental mechanisms, phylogenetic relationships, evolutionary models, and an appreciation for the impact of ecology on patterns of development (eco‐evo‐devo). Molecular phylogenetic analyses have converged on strong support for the majority of branches in the Salamander Tree of Life, which includes 764 described species. Ancestral reconstructions reveal repeated transitions between life cycle modes and ecologies. The salamander fossil record is scant, but key Mesozoic species support the antiquity of life cycle transitions in some families. Colonization of diverse habitats has promoted phenotypic diversification and sometimes convergence when similar environments have been independently invaded. However, unrelated lineages may follow different developmental pathways to arrive at convergent phenotypes. This article summarizes ecological and endocrine‐based causes of life cycle transitions in salamanders, as well as consequences to body size, genome size, and skeletal structure. Salamanders offer a rich source of comparisons for understanding how the evolution of developmental patterns has led to phenotypic diversification following shifts to new adaptive zones.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/dvdy.373

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Greater environmental stability is likely the main explanation for the latitudinal pattern, resulting in less pressure for energetically expensive morphological change across seasons.

    “Although many environmental attributes vary with latitude, greater environmental stability is likely the main explanation here, resulting in less pressure for energetically expensive morphological change across the seasons”

    From The neoteny goldilocks zone: The evolution of neoteny in <i>Ambystoma</i> (2024) · cites this paper as Bonett et al., 2022

  • In most metamorphic amphibians, development is dependent on changing seasons, triggered by changing temperature, day length or rainfall.

    “In most metamorphic amphibians, including many mole salamanders, development is dependent on the changing seasons, triggered by changing temperature, day length or rainfall”

    From The neoteny goldilocks zone: The evolution of neoteny in <i>Ambystoma</i> (2024) · cites this paper as Bonett et al., 2022

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bonett, R. M., Ledbetter, N. M., Hess, A. J., Herrboldt, M. A., & Denoël, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Tulsa (US)
  • University of Liège (BE)
Corresponding author
Bonett, Ronald M.
Venue
Developmental Dynamics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-06-02
Volume
251
Issue
6
Pages
957-972
ISSN
  • 1058-8388 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0177
OpenAlex
W3162458313
Cited by
38
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Dynamics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences (DEB 1050322, DEB 1840987)
  • Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS (J.0008.13, J.0112.16, T.0070.19)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
salamanders, life cycle transitions, evolutionary developmental biology, eco-evo-devo, developmental trajectories, ancestral state reconstruction, habitat colonization, phenotypic convergence, body size, genome size, skeleton, adaptive zones, phenotypic diversification
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Evolution, Fossils, Life Cycle Stages, Phylogeny, Caudata, Urodela

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review